Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This Is Bad: We're Heading for 'Water Bankruptcy'

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 4:42 PM on February 2, 2009.


From California to the Himalayas, things are looking bad.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Water in your
mailbox!

 

In case you haven't been following recent headlines around water, they go something like this:

"Argentine farmers face ruin as drought kills cattle, crops" (CNN)

"Nevada a natural disaster area due to drought" (AP)

"Kingdom braces for drought-like conditions" (Jordan Times)

"Calif. facing worst drought in modern history" (USA Today)

"Kenya to declare national emergency over drought" (Reuters)

And to sum that all up, a new report recently released said that: "The world is heading toward 'water bankruptcy' as demand for the precious commodity outstrips even high population growth," AFP reported.

In less than 20 years water scarcity could lose the equivalent of the entire grain crops of India and the United States, said the World Economic Forum report, which added that food demand is expected to sky-rocket in coming decades.
"The world simply cannot manage water in the future in the same way as in the past or the economic web will collapse," said the report.

Across the world, water resources are strapped and climate change is sure to make things worse in many areas. One of the hardest hit will be Asia where melting glaciers in the Himalayas could be gone by 2100, leaving 2 billion people without drinking water. As if that weren't enough, "about 70 major rivers around the world are close to being totally drained in order to supply water for irrigation and reservoirs," according to the report.

Closer to home, California has made recent news with dire water predictions for the coming months, as the state seems to be hitting year three of drought.

"We may be at the start of the worst California drought in modern history," said California Department of Water Resources Director Lester Snow.

So what do we do? First, we need to combat climate change and we need to begin thinking of our water and energy problems in tandem. We can no longer find fixes for one that make the other one worse. It takes lots energy to move, use and treat water. And it takes lots of water to cool power plants.  With that thinking, things like desalination and ethanol make less and less sense (if they ever did at all, anyway). Desal uses too much energy and biofuels, too much water. If you want to save water, you can definitely turn off your tap while you brush your teeth, but better yet, start saving electricity and driving your car less and eating lower on the food chain and more locally.

Of course, this isn't just an issue that will be solved by individuals. We need better policy for water use in agriculture and industry and we need to move away from energy sources that are extremely water intensive -- like coal and nuclear plants, toward sources like wind and solar. It makes sense from both a water and climate change perspective. And what we need right now is some big picture thinking.

Digg!

Tagged as: water, global warming, climate change, drought, water scarcity

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


PETA Teams Up With Glenn Beck to Bash Al Gore
Apparently Beck thinks PETA is as rad as the NRA. Who knew?
Post by Tara Lohan. November 6, 2009.
Join Me for the No Impact Week Challenge
Take part in a week-long project to learn about your environmental footprint and reduce what you use and buy.
Post by Tara Lohan. October 12, 2009.
Wait, We Just Bombed the Moon?
Doesn't anyone else in the universe get a say in this?
Post by Tara Lohan. October 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The author is part of the problem
Posted by: pelican beak on Feb 2, 2009 5:18 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re: "So what do we do? First, we need to combat climate change and we need to begin thinking of our water and energy problems in tandem. "

Why does the author, Tara Lohan, insist that we de-couple water and energy from all the other eco-problems we face? Water, energy, habitat destruction, deforestation, fishery collapses, modern agriculture, pollutions, introduction of exotics, our own over-population, and all the rest are various symptoms of the large central problem (human life-destructive behavior) which we need to control.

The author's proposed solution is simply a re-statement of the bogus reasoning we've followed to create problems such as this. So long as we keep dividing up the various symptoms of our behavioral sickness, to treat them in piecemeal fashion, we are simply coming up with yet more creative excuses to not functionally deal with root causes at all.

Neither conservatives nor progressives have the spine to look themselves clearly in the mirror as the cause of our eco-problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

erm, k. Stop F*CKING?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 2, 2009 5:50 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or, STOP LIVING IN DESERTS?

What in the eff you see kay did you think you were going to drink in Las Vegas or anywhere else where water is scarce, anyway? If you are going to have kids and are going thirsty yourself, what in the hell did you think your kids would drink, fools?

Ah, nevermind. Living responsibly, within your means, would conflict with your ideology.

Free love and flowers, right up until it kills you.

Go you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: erm, hey... it's ok... Posted by: Ghoulman
Clean Water has to become a Human Right ... Not a Property Right ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Feb 2, 2009 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Water here in the US and around the world is considered a property right. Until water is decoupled from the idea it is private property and managed as a public resource the problems will only get worse.

It has only been the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act that has saved us from much misery here in the US.

Until we move to a sustainable economy and treat our environment as a precious resource and not an unlimited source to mine and pollute will we find real answers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

villager
Posted by: villager1 on Feb 3, 2009 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We actually have no rights to anything, as we have made the laws governing our "rights" ourselves!

Natural laws grant us no rights, only privileges, which we have confused as being "given rights" - to our detriment!

Our misconceptions and wrong choices have got us into a lot of trouble and thinking that nature owes us anything is a huge misconception and indicative of totally misguided thinking.

We can be certain that we will run out of water and resultantly, food as well, and we are not in a position to demand these precious gifts as a "right of any kind"

Our incredible greed has caused the beginning of our demise but we just cannot face that fact and accept that we have blundered enormously.

Instead, we search in absolute futility, for ways and means to assist us in our unquenchable thirst for more and more of everything,
instead of reconsidering the stupid choices we made.

Liken this to a doctor telling a terminal patient not to worry since he/she has a long, healthy and prosperous future ahead! and the monitors and life support systems attached to every orifice of their
useless and inoperative frame are of no great concern whatsoever!

Some people are crazy enough to believe that there are no limits to anything and that no matter how much we destroy this planet we can always fix it!

Yes indeed there are other planets out there - shall we go and destroy them as well? Sure, why not? if we can make a buck out of it!

I have news for them! " It ain't gonna work!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BarbR7
Posted by: ibelieve on Feb 3, 2009 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The situation is dire, and you can bet that it's much worse than we are being told. Ideally the solution would entail a cooperative, comprehensive effort which addresses lifestyle change and ecologically sound decision making. But we don't have the time. Water must be nationalized immediately so that decisions are not profit-driven. Second, states and cities must immediately adopt workable regulations allowing the use of grey water - and the systems must be affordable, not another cash cow for corporations or strapped city governments. Third, bottled water must be banned. It is unconscionable that corporations have gone into India and other countries and bought entire lakes and drained them dry or siphoned off the volcanic water reservoirs in Fiji, leading to irreparable damage to the ecosystem. Besides, the petroleum used in the making and transporting of the bottles is wasteful and expensive, not to mention the fact that plastic is destroying ecosystems and wildlife. Finally, the issue of overpopulation must be dealt with. The earth simply cannot sustain its human burden. Family planing and contraception must be made available to all, and frankly, it is probable that limits will be imposed in the future. This will take radical and courageous effort oon the behalf of the world's leaders, but it must be done NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water redux!
Posted by: Penros on Feb 3, 2009 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conserve water by restoring the cycles of nature! Huge cornfields with bare earth between rows only allow immediate evaporation! Trees hold and retain water within the forested areas. We need billions of acres of ground cover and mulch, trees and weeds to hold the water naturally in the earth. Return the livestock to the land so their 'fertilizer' can enrich the soil. We need to encourage soil-based life forms by discouraging oil-based chemical farming which kills everything it touches, even sometimes the farmer.

Read Michael Pollan! Read Wendell Berry and the Rodale books on organic farming, which we have always done until the world wars brought back surplus killing chemicals which were re-used on farm soil. Chemicals which kill insects and weeds also just plain-and-simple kill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water redux! Posted by: henderson
I agree but....
Posted by: Windwhistler on Feb 3, 2009 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above comments to this article have really nailed it in my opinion. Many people are "getting it". However, I can in no way see how the "haves" are going to give up anything they have in any cooperative effort to save society. We are on the rails to a breath-taking world wide population "adjustment" as I see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is more water in the world than land
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 3, 2009 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, there is that minor inconvenience that it is undrinkable salt water.

But if you put a nuclear reactor on the coast, a byproduct of that reactor is clean drinking water.

We all know that we are running out of drinking water.

It is time to MAKE it, the same way they have been making it on US Navy ships for half a century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ahh yes...Nuclear water?? Posted by: greenPuker
The elephant in the room.
Posted by: SteveO on Feb 3, 2009 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real problem is over population. We have exceeded the number of humans that this planet can support be at least a factor of 2 (if not 10). Food water and energy shortages are a symptom of the problem, not the problem.

Breeding is biologically programmed into humans and unless we learn to control that part of our nature, nature will control our population for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conception reduction?? Posted by: greenPuker
THE issue of the future
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Feb 3, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bottom line is without water--we are dust. Though this is THE issue of the future-though the lack of comments on this article shows how under the radar it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water Problems
Posted by: Archie1954 on Feb 3, 2009 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a lot of water in North America, it just isn't where it is needed most. The South and Southwest are in dire straits. That is where water must be found to prevent a catastrophe. But where is this water? In Canada! Approximately 20% of the world's fresh water is located north of the border and 90% of that flows into the oceans every day. Why can't a major environmentally sound project be institued between friends to supply the US with water and lots of it? Is this impossible? Is it too big a job? Too politically fraught with problems? Too expensive? Why can't the politicians decide to get started at least discussing the matter? The water problem is not going away and can only get worse without some effort to alleviate it. Timing is everything. This is a perfect time to get everyone back to work with the largest water works program in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water Problems Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: Water Problems Posted by: greenPuker
Balance
Posted by: willymack on Feb 3, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've still got all the water we ever had, and will continue to until about a billion years from now when the sun's energy output increases. When there's a drought in one place, another gets extra rain. The problem now seems to be that the extra rain is falling over the sea where it can't be recovered.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's what we can do and always have done.
Posted by: symcokid on Feb 3, 2009 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We will just take away some more of the Native Indian water rights. What to hell we've stolen everything else they ever had away from them - there you are problem solved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water conservation
Posted by: deenakits on Feb 5, 2009 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After moving from Colorado where water is hard to come by, I tried to have a holding tank installed in order to re-use "grey" water to water a garden. I was told that was illegal as some kid might come along and drink it, get sick and both myself and the plumber could be sued. I can scarely imagine my washing machine water or dishwasher water would be too dirty to water dirt. We need changes in our laws. Where do we start??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]