Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Do Free Markets Hate Our Troops?

Posted by Jill Hussein C., Brilliant at Breakfast at 7:51 AM on July 20, 2008.


Perhaps this will put an end to the idea that the private sector does everything better.?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

For over two decades, we've heard that privatization is the way to go; that the private sector does everything better than the government ever can. This belief has persisted despite the success of federal programs like Head Start, and yes, even Social Security and Medicare.

Even after WorldCom, Enron, Countrywide, and now the IndyMac bank failure, the myth of corporate competence always being superior to that of government persists. And even though Republicans have given lip service to being supportive of, even worshipful of, the military, they've done what they can to outsource that too.

But how is it possible to defend the profit motive when it bumps up against endangering the very troops that they've been using as political props for the last seven years?

Shoddy electrical work by private contractors on United States military bases in Iraq is widespread and dangerous, causing more deaths and injuries from fires and shocks than the Pentagon has acknowledged, according to internal Army documents.

During just one six-month period -- August 2006 through January 2007 -- at least 283 electrical fires destroyed or damaged American military facilities in Iraq, including the military's largest dining hall in the country, documents obtained by The New York Times show. Two soldiers died in an electrical fire at their base near Tikrit in 2006, the records note, while another was injured while jumping from a burning guard tower in May 2007.

And while the Pentagon has previously reported that 13 Americans have been electrocuted in Iraq, many more have been injured, some seriously, by shocks, according to the documents. A log compiled earlier this year at one building complex in Baghdad disclosed that soldiers complained of receiving electrical shocks in their living quarters on an almost daily basis.

Electrical problems were the most urgent noncombat safety hazard for soldiers in Iraq, according to an Army survey issued in February 2007. It noted "a safety threat theaterwide created by the poor-quality electrical fixtures procured and installed, sometimes incorrectly, thus resulting in a significant number of fires."

The Army report said KBR, the Houston-based company that is responsible for providing basic services for American troops in Iraq, including housing, did its own study and found a "systemic problem" with electrical work.

But the Pentagon did little to address the issue until a Green Beret, Staff Sgt. Ryan D. Maseth, was electrocuted in January while showering. His death, caused by poor electrical grounding, drew the attention of lawmakers and Pentagon leaders after his family pushed for answers. Congress and the Pentagon's inspector general have begun investigations, and this month senior Army officials ordered electrical inspections of all buildings in Iraq maintained by KBR.

"We consider this to be a very serious issue," Chris Isleib, a Pentagon spokesman, said Thursday in an e-mail message, while declining to comment on the findings in the Army documents.

Heather Browne, a KBR spokeswoman, would not comment about a company safety study or the reports of electrical fires or shocks, but she said KBR had found no evidence of a link between its work and the electrocutions. She added, "KBR's commitment to the safety of all employees and those the company serves remains unwavering."

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, kbr

Jill Hussein C. blogs at Brilliant at Breakfast.


Michael Moore Dares to Ask: What's So Heroic About Being Shot Down While Bombing Innocent Civilians?
Like Iraq, Vietnam was not a noble cause. It's time we stopped letting politicians and the press perpetuate the McCain War Hero myth.
Post by Liliana Segura. August 21, 2008.
Bush Capitulates, Troop Withdrawal in 2011?
The left won the Iraq debate. Period.
Post by Spencer Ackerman. August 21, 2008.
DOJ Preparing to Charge Six Blackwater Guards in Nisour Square Massacre
Indictments for the killing of 17 Iraqis would likely be sought under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, which would be unprecedented.
Post by Nick Fiske. August 19, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Hate" requires some level of forethought
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 20, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and all these contractors ever thought about was the $$$. Complete indifference towards our troops, which is even worse imo.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And so it goes...
Posted by: CanuckKid on Jul 20, 2008 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...The people who beat the war drums the loudest are usually the ones who have the least to lose and stand to make the most money from it. Always have been, always will be.

The people who are most likely to pay are the ones who wear the combat boots. Always have been, always will be.

"Support the Troops", my butt. The crooks that put them there in the first place don't give a rat's ass about the troops. To them, the troops are single-use throwaway items - always have been, always will be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Improve America
Posted by: weathered on Jul 20, 2008 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drop-ship Joe Lieberman's deceitful ass in the sands of Iraq. May he wash the feet of those living and dying there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Improve America Posted by: technocrat
where are the resident wingnut trolls: EncinoM, carbon-based et al?
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jul 20, 2008 7:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
come out and defend the ideology you worship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The Free Market"
Posted by: corazon on Jul 20, 2008 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Theres a free market in this country but it exists on a much smaller scale than what you would expect. Take for instance the Farmers Market where producer and consumer meet and mutually agree to a price for the Farmer's goods. On the larger scale (public traded companies) is where the system has gone awire. Through the Governments rules, regs, and taxation policys, the Free Market has been warped into a sort of Mercantilism where its kill or be killed and whoever can get so and so congressman or senator to make special accomodations for those goods(trade deals) or services(government contracts) gets to top dog status. There are very few industries in the United States or World for that matter that operate freely and without fear of coersion from Government or State regulators and taxes. The problem with Enron was not that it was un-regulated, its problem was its RELIANCE on corporate welfare from the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. Enron benefited from another Government agency, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.Enron gave Bill Clinton a $100,000 donation for getting it a 600 million dollar power plant job in India. The Governments involvement in the Market actually distorts the Market. The governments involvement in capitalism as it exists today has caused most of the problems that exist in corporate America.
The government tries to fine tune corporate america thru its various agencys but always mangles it. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I would beg to differ that FDR's and LBJ's New Deal programs have been any benefit to society. They have actually increased poverty, contributed to the break down of poor and middle class families. Again they were attended to do good, but have actually caused considerable harm to this country.
Every company who mentioned has been involved with the Government you so ardently worship. The Government created the conditions that created the problems that exist today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "The Free Market" Posted by: HighburyJD
» RE: "The 'Free' Market" Posted by: Marysue5252
» RE: "The Free Market" Posted by: 113121
free market is oxymoron
Posted by: luzmejor on Jul 21, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Markets are regulated out of necessity. A market economy that is spoken about as being "free" of restraint is the one that is making all the rules for everyone else. The result of that is definitely not any man's definition of freedom.

What I am concerned about is the lack of freedom for the people who actually do the work..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One issue
Posted by: Knot_Rich on Jul 21, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it strange how Jill can take one situation, some electrical problems, performed by some contractors on some military bases, but, she never identifies, and probably never even attempted to determine, who did the work? Iraqi labor possibly, probably, more than likely problems caused by a lack of understanding of American electrical systems, and maybe even a case or three deliberate to harm our troops. When you have a push for speed, get things done in a hurry, and are using foreign labor, there are bound to be problems. Still a failure by our contractors for lack of oversight, but we have to keep in mind who does a lot of the building on our American bases, without these problems, as well as who does so much work on every level from building your highways and water systems to sewer plants and electrical grids. All free enterprise contractors thru the bidding process. Still, she attempts to take this one circumstance and use it as some indictment of the entire free enterprise system, infering the government, all knowing and all powerful, the very clowns we see criticized right here day after day, is far wiser than than any mere mortal average citizen businessman(or woman) could hope to be. Kind of like communism, and we see where that went. I bet Jill's house was built by an independent contractor, chosen by her free will based on her research as to quality and price, electrical, plumbing, the whole nine yards, not by some government entity. If you want to see money wasted, give it to the government, they do nothing but sit around all day dreaming of ways to spend it, usually in some fashion that will enhance their chances of re-election instead of what's in the overall best wishes of the country. Jill is so full of it she squishes when she walks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One issue Posted by: CJC
CAPITALISM = SOVEREIGNTY OF $, NOT PEOPLE
Posted by: parviz45 on Jul 21, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is anyone surprised when prime consideration is given to the bottom line? We don't need regulations, we don't need public domain, no, sovereignty belongs to the market, it'll set the principles of values and morality, priorities, and all we have to do is entrench corporate globalization to undermine democracy and ensure our serfdom. Why have non-profit public funded socialized mdicine when we can give huge profits to big corporations with all those nice large and small fine prints that make denials easy...why give the task of creating money to our government when we can give it to international banks...I guess I must have been blind not to have seen the successful track record of privatization and capitalism!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forty years ago I left college and ventured out into the corporate world. I found
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 21, 2008 9:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that not only were they inefficient, but they had the capacity just to pass on their ineffcicency to their customers. I was embarassed for them.

I side stepped into government. If I had stayed in the corporate world I might at some time done slightly better. But, the chances are that my retirement would have been canceled at the last minute. I really suggest to young people that they avoid the corporate world. They are at the core unethical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]