Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
News Giving Me the Jitters About an Attack on Iran
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
While poking around Iraqi news I ran across an odd little piece in the Arab Times reporting that Israel was denying reports that Israeli fighter jets were using US bases in Iraq to practice for an attack on Iran. My perennial worry about an attack on Iran kicked in - and was not eased by the report in the Sunday Times of London that Bush has "amber lighted" an Israeli attack on Iran:
President George W Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations with Tehran break down, according to a senior Pentagon official.and that Israel may well want to act before a potential Obama presidency:
Senator Barack Obama's previous opposition to the war in Iraq, and his apparent doubts about the urgency of the Iranian threat, have intensified pressure on the Israeli hawks to act before November's US presidential election. "If I were an Israeli I wouldn't wait," the Pentagon official added.The Israeli news site Ynet makes that last bit even more worrying in their video account which includes a mention of Obama's plan to visit Israel this summer and notes that:
In the event a military strike takes place during his visit the Democratic candidate would be forced to make a stand regarding the issue possibly jeopardizing his position as America's next president.Is that called a "win-win" by the Bush/Olmert crew?
People around two US airbases (Assad in Anbar, and Ali bin Abi Talib in Nassiriya) had been noticing unusual nighttime takeoffs and landings of fighter planes, along with unusually tight security for several weeks, and anonymous Iraqi Defence Dept people had concluded it was American or Israeli (more the latter since the Anbar flights seemed to be coming from Jordan), and they pointed out that from the Nassiriya base you could in in Iranian airspace in 5 minutes and to Bushehr very quickly.The Jerusalem Post article mentioned in the Arab Times reports a official denial of the story but it is less than categorical and AFP ran with the following less than reassuring denials:
Defence Ministry spokesman Major General Mohammed al-Askari dismissed the report on Friday.
"We have no information about Israeli jets using Iraqi airspace for rehearsals," he told AFP.
In Jerusalem, meanwhile, an Israeli military spokesman told AFP he was aware of the report and said, "I have no information on this."
The US military did not comment on the report.So add this all to the jitters file ...
I am not an expert in the field of missile technology, but the missiles in the faked photograph appear to be anti-aircraft ground to air missiles or artillery rockets. The slanted attitude of launch speaks to that. No? Anti-aircraft missiles would be a threat to aircraft, not to Israeli cities. Artillery rockets are a battlefield weapon.
If those missiles are not ballistic missiles, then several interesting questions arise:
1- Which governments are fooling around here?
2- If these are not ballistic missiles, why are the MSM propagating the implication that this photograph displays missiles that are a threat to Israel?I'm swearing off caffeine until this all settles ...
| Also in War on Iraq | |||
| Why Is it Different When Americans Rape? Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different? Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009. |
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images. Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009. |
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial. Post by tristero. May 15, 2009. |
|