Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Deja Vu: When Have We Heard of this 'Significant Progress in Iraq' Before?

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 7:21 AM on April 11, 2008.


Once or twice.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

Note from PEEK Guest Editor Joshua H: I wrote a very similar post about "milestones" and "turning points" when Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006. Brilliant minds and all that ...

This morning, speaking from the White House, the president boasted, "American and Iraqi forces have made significant progress" in Iraq. It got me thinking, haven't we heard that phrase before in relation to Iraq?

* White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan on October 27, 2003: "In the north and south [of Iraq], we have made significant progress."

* President Bush on November 13, 2004: "Fighting together, our forces have made significant progress in the last several days."

* President Bush on June 28, 2005: "In the past year, we have made significant progress."

* Vice President Cheney on October 19, 2006: "[W]e've made significant progress."

* President Bush on February 23, 2007: " I think we have made significant progress in Iraq."

Indeed, it's a phrase the White House has used to describe events in Iraq several hundred times over the last five years. I can't imagine why anyone would be skeptical about the claim now.

And as long as we're on the subject of this morning's speech, Bush also announced today:

"To ease the burden on our troops and their families, I've directed the Secretary of Defense to reduce deployment lengths from 15 months to 12 months for all active Army soldiers deploying to the Central Command area of operations. These changes will be effective for those deploying after August 1st. We'll also ensure that our Army units will have at least a year home for every year in the field."

This sounds familiar, too, in large part because Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) was recommending this change in policy last year.

At the time, one of Webb's colleagues said Webb's proposal would "emasculate" the surge policy, "could easily bring about ... defeat," and lead to "chaos and genocide" in the region. The colleague, of course, was John McCain.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, iraq, propaganda, mccain

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Meet the Texas Senator Who Couldn't Care Less About Our Vets
Sen. John Cornyn doesn't support our troops or veterans.
Post by Robert Greenwald. October 9, 2008.
U.S. Security Firm Indicted for Fraud in Afghanistan
The company, called U.S. Protection and Investigation, is accused of getting paid "inflated" amounts for its work on behalf of USAID.
Post by Bernard Hibbitts. October 6, 2008.
Iraq to Give 82% of Proven Oil Reserves to International Oil Companies
Oil companies to benefit from war? Say it ain't so.
Post by Staff. October 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
drugstore
Posted by: fernando1 on Apr 15, 2008 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]