Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Deja Vu: When Have We Heard of this 'Significant Progress in Iraq' Before?
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
Also in War on Iraq
Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime
Liliana Segura AlterNet
Veterans Against McCain
Vote Vets
Rethinking Afghanistan
Katrina Vanden Heuvel The Nation
Note from PEEK Guest Editor Joshua H: I wrote a very similar post about "milestones" and "turning points" when Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006. Brilliant minds and all that ...
This morning, speaking from the White House, the president boasted, "American and Iraqi forces have made significant progress" in Iraq. It got me thinking, haven't we heard that phrase before in relation to Iraq?
* White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan on October 27, 2003: "In the north and south [of Iraq], we have made significant progress."
* President Bush on November 13, 2004: "Fighting together, our forces have made significant progress in the last several days."
* President Bush on June 28, 2005: "In the past year, we have made significant progress."
* Vice President Cheney on October 19, 2006: "[W]e've made significant progress."
* President Bush on February 23, 2007: " I think we have made significant progress in Iraq."
Indeed, it's a phrase the White House has used to describe events in Iraq several hundred times over the last five years. I can't imagine why anyone would be skeptical about the claim now.
And as long as we're on the subject of this morning's speech, Bush also announced today:
"To ease the burden on our troops and their families, I've directed the Secretary of Defense to reduce deployment lengths from 15 months to 12 months for all active Army soldiers deploying to the Central Command area of operations. These changes will be effective for those deploying after August 1st. We'll also ensure that our Army units will have at least a year home for every year in the field."
This sounds familiar, too, in large part because Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) was recommending this change in policy last year.
At the time, one of Webb's colleagues said Webb's proposal would "emasculate" the surge policy, "could easily bring about ... defeat," and lead to "chaos and genocide" in the region. The colleague, of course, was John McCain.
Tagged as: propaganda, bush, mccain, iraq
Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.
| Also in War on Iraq | |||
| Air Force Brass Get "Comfort Capsules" on Taxpayer's Dime A new report finds the Air Force is spending counterterrorism funds on luxury in-flight seating for military and civilian leaders. Post by Liliana Segura. July 24, 2008. |
Veterans Against McCain New VoteVet.org ad gives voice to veterans for redeployment. Post by Vote Vets. July 24, 2008. |
Rethinking Afghanistan Obama is showing sound thinking on Iraq, so why does he continue to talk abou tescalating the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan? Post by Katrina Vanden Heuvel. July 24, 2008. |
|