Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Jeremy Scahill Confronts BlackWater Honchos

Posted by Jeremy Scahill, Huffington Post at 1:00 PM on April 8, 2008.


"My question to you is, how many innocent Iraqis has your company killed?"

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

Last week, I spoke at a conference organized by NYU's Center on Law and Security called "Privatizing Defense: Blackwater, Contractors, and American Security." Also present at the conference were Blackwater Worldwide vice president Martin Strong and a lawyer for Blackwater, David Hammond. At the conference, I confronted Strong on Blackwater's killing of 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad's Nisour Square on September 16, 2007. The day after our exchange, the Bush Administration extended Blackwater's Iraq "security" contract for another year:

Democracy Now! videotaped the session and covered Blackwater's contract extension -- the video is in the window to your right.

JEREMY SCAHILL, AUTHOR, BLACKWATER: My name is Jeremy Scahill. I find it very telling that nowhere on this panel do we hear a voice talking about the Iraqi victims of these companies. I find it very interesting--the way that Mr. Strong and Mr. [Doug] Brooks [president of the pro-industry International Peace Operations Association] talk about this, we could be at a banking convention.

The reality is that Blackwater has killed innocent civilians in Iraq. I'm not sure if you're aware of this, Mr. Strong, but the first victims in Nisour Square that day were a twenty-year-old medical
student and his mother, not al-Qaeda operatives, not Iraqi insurgents. A nine-year-old boy named Ali was shot in the skull; his brains splattered in his [father's] hands. Your operatives were on the scene that day. They opened fire on these individuals.

And if you don't want to take the word of the witnesses, what about the military that investigated it on the spot that day and found that all seventeen of the Iraqis killed by your men were killed as a result of unprovoked and unjustified gunfire? This was the military investigation. They also found that there was excessive use of force that potentially violated the rules governing contractors in Iraq. When the FBI findings were released in part to the New York Times, they found that fourteen of the seventeen were killed as a result of unjustified and unprovoked gunfire.

My question to you is, how many innocent Iraqis has your company killed? And what consequences have your men faced for those actions?

MODERATOR: Well, that's about--you answered--speak as you want to speak in response, sorry.

MARTIN STRONG, BLACKWATER VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the third panel is about accountability, if you want to re-ask that question at that point. I'm not a lawyer. I don't know how much time you spent in Iraq or in combat, but I spent twenty years and did thirty-six combat missions, and I spent nine months in Iraq. And it's a very difficult place. And I think the FBI, who has not issued their investigative report, irrespective of the New York Times or any other newspaper saying that they think they know what's going on, the FBI is going to complete an official investigation, not one done by the seat of the pants. And at that time, we're going to find out exactly what they found out. We have not, as a company, had access to that information, nor did we conduct our own little investigation so I could respond to your question directly. We have no idea what happened there by going back and forensically looking at it. We're awaiting the government's investigation.

[I then responded to Blackwater's Strong later in the day (Strong was sitting in front of me)]

JEREMY SCAHILL: I tried to raise this question with Mr. Strong during his panel, and he chose to ignore the key point that I was raising. And that was the following, that you can dismiss all you want, Mr. Strong, the testimony of the Iraqi witnesses and survivors, like the lawyer who was shot four times in his back as he fled your gunmen; you can dismiss the testimony of a father who held his son's dying body, brain splattered all over him, returning the next day to pick up pieces of his skull to bury in Najaf; you can dismiss the words of Dr. Jawad, whose twenty-year-old medical student son was killed, [Jawad's] wife, alongside [him]; but you can't dismiss Lieutenant Colonel Mike Tarsa's investigation of the shooting by your men that day. They concluded, contrary to the statements of your company, that there was no enemy activity involved. They labeled the killings a criminal event. Lieutenant Colonel Mike Tarsa's men said that they found all seventeen of the Iraqis killed that day were killed as a result of unjustified and unprovoked fire by the Blackwater operatives.

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, blackwater, mercenaries, scahill

Jeremy Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.


TONIGHT: Incredible Iraq Documentary 'Section 60'
Filmmakers Jon Alpert and Matthew O'Neill's latest doc will air tonight on HBO at 9pm (EST).
Post by Staff. October 13, 2008.
Iraqi Ministry Reopens Cases of Murdered Journalists
Police have started investigating some 49 files related to Iraqi journalists killed or kidnapped since the 2003 invasion.
Post by Yaser Abbas. October 13, 2008.
Meet the Texas Senator Who Couldn't Care Less About Our Vets
Sen. John Cornyn doesn't support our troops or veterans.
Post by Robert Greenwald. October 9, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
THANK YOU JEREMY SCAHILL!!!
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 8, 2008 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Continue to confront! Continue to expose! Continue to ask the right questions! Continue to write about these injustices that we can know the truth of what's being done in Iraq by these theives and criminals.

You speak for all of us who are appalled at the criminality that is being done in our name and paid for by our tax dollars!

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THANK YOU JEREMY SCAHILL!!! Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
Mercenaries
Posted by: blackie4aces on Apr 8, 2008 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All mercenary forces are murdering sonsofbitches. No one who has a distaste for killing joins these organizations, no matter how dire their financial situation may be. Although it is unpleasant to face, there are those who really like combat, the adrenaline rush, the power, the feeling of immortality and indestructability that continued survival can provide, the on-the-edge constant high. There is a living for the moment, every single moment, since it may be your last, which is very liberating and which often translates into doing anything someone wants to do, because other than survival nothing else rises to a comparable level of importance. There can exist for many almost no behavioral boundaries. There are those who are quite willing to kill for these reasons. Pay extremely good money on top of all of that and, as they say in the beer commercials, "it just doesn't get any better than that."

All of this is Rumsfeld's and the Free Marketers dream come true. The ultimate privatization, the ultimate shedding of direct government involvement in services, even when that service is waging war. This disaster was the gleam in the cost-cutting ex-CEO's eye for who can know how long. But the bottom line in this case is death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mercenaries Posted by: rdrjames
Thankful
Posted by: Nikkimjf on Apr 8, 2008 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so thankful that Jeremy Scahill can stand up to the corporate bullies with a provocative message. He speaks the truth and the wisdom that many wish they could speak, but their voices are often silenced. I feel a glimpse of optimism shift forward when America has journalists such as Jeremy Scahill and Democracy Now! and represent the outlets that so many of us were seeking and found. I feel like Mr. Scahill should get more recognition for his ongoing battles with Blackwater. He reported during the Winter Solider testimony and often provides Senators and Congressman with information on Blackwater. It's encourgaging when we have someone such as Scahill, Goodman, Klein, or Zinn to represent a voice that needs heard. Although the message is often sad, and hard to swallow: it's information that helps to arm ourselves in a society filled with unarmored victims of corporate media. Spread the word. Spread the message. And continue to fund it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 8, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pursue the Bush administration beyond January 20 until they are brought to justice.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and so it goes
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Apr 8, 2008 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
spineless democrats,criminal republicans,voting public majority not as smart as a 5th grader. none of these people will be brought to justice as they should. they already got another contract. fucking criminal! the fix is in. jeremy scahill should get the medal of freedom,but he won't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How far will we let them go?
Posted by: topbrick on Apr 9, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is very sinister. Has anyone noticed Erik Prince's faux military Adolf Hitler wannabe haircut? These people are fascists and Iraq is only practice for them. Before long they will become the private police force within the USA, too. The American people will be paying taxes in order to be controlled and hounded by these goons. Wake up America. Turn off your tvs and take back your country!
Thank you, Jeremy Scahill, for courageously confronting them on our behalf.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» As far as Cheney wants them to Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
» RE: How far will we let them go? Posted by: blackie4aces
citizen
Posted by: annejohnson on Apr 9, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if Blackwater acts without accountability and restraint, and obeys only the Commander in Chief (who's financing Blackwater?), it appears easy to turn that private army on us. Those national security directives and secret executive orders that Bush so dearly loves are chockful of things we don't know. But I do know about Infragard, Bush's merging of business and the feds--yet another private army. They can shoot to kill. I'm not making this up.
Google Infragard. Think about Animal Farm and what happened to the puppies and in what guise they apeared later on in the book. That's Blackwater. That's Infragard. That's scary.
It's impeachment time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: citizen Posted by: QCao009
» They've already been turned on us! Posted by: trappedintwilightzone
» RE: citizen Posted by: Quannah
» RE: citizen Posted by: blackie4aces
SO!?
Posted by: GrannyBgood on Apr 9, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oily Dick Cheney:
"SO?!!?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jericho
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 9, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever see that network series (that got canceled, of course) Jericho?

Somebody knows sumpin...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"...potentially violated the rules governing contractors"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Apr 9, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What rules??????????????
No pity or sympathy for fucking mercs. Just jail cells.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater
Posted by: modeler on Apr 9, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you realize that the SS of Hitlers rule wore black? No surprise therefore if Bushits Blackwater acts even worse than Hitlers blackguards. And dont ever call it free America, under the rule of the Shrubs freedom has gone AWOL like the worst Shrub of all during the Vietnam war. Commander in Chief, what a misnomer in this case, should CiCheese.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blackwater Posted by: Quannah
different rules for different people
Posted by: anna v on Apr 9, 2008 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone notice that when a non-Iraqi kills an Iraqi nothing is done, but when an Iraqi stabs a non-Iraqi they throw the book at him. This is a typical double standard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The word PRIVITIZATION when used by a right wing nut or for that matter just politically
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 9, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has a SYNONYM. It is CRIMINAL. Government employees work for us. The employees of private contractors work for their bosses. Their bosses only work for profit.

They use the taxpayers money that they get from the government contract to buy politicians and professional liars, propagandists, to insure that the cycle can repeat. We really must ignore the liars and change the politicians.

Moreover, privitization means the sale of public property. We own it, you and I; they sell it. This is not surplus property. This included a section of interstate 80. It was built with 90 percent federal matching funds. We all owned 90 percent of it. The state of Indiana sold it to a consortioum to put up toll booths. Now we are going to pay a toll to drive down our own road.

Privitization really means the thieft of public property. Its the republican version of vandalism and grafitti. Remember that Ronald Reagan tried to lease out Yosemite National Park.

Do you know why George Bush is not going to be put up on mount Rushmore? There isn't enough space for two faces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater's Weapons
Posted by: buzzsaw on Apr 9, 2008 7:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater and other such security firms shouldn't be allowed to play with any toys that other civilians aren't allowed to have.

Take their machine guns and other military weapons away from them, or repeal the National Firearms Act (and a few others), so we can legally arm ourselves in like manner.

The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting, it's about resisting tyranny and occupation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeremy should have included my comments if he's being honest
Posted by: Hoosier84 on Apr 16, 2008 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Jeremy revels in waving bloody shirts, and being against all sorts of things, he is remarkably short of answers. The private sector supports international stability operations all over the world - especially in places the West has largely abandoned such as Darfur and Eastern Congo.

It would be helpful to AlertNet readers if Jeremy would include the full transcript of the forum so readers can understand the complex context of the event.

Although Jeremy's cheap shots were entertaining from a sound bite perspective, the event was far more informative and nuanced than he suggests.

With that kind of journalism it is no wonder the media is in such disrepute.

Regards,

Doug Brooks
President, IPOA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]