Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Would John McCain Institute a Draft in January? Or Would We Wait Until February?
Maybe I've just missed it-- perhaps because of all the breathless distractions about Obama's pastor and bowling score-- but I could swear the corporate media isn't informing their audience that a vote for John McCain is a vote for the re-instatement of a military draft. Now, call me naive, but I have to believe that even his barbeque buddies would agree that most voters would be more interested in a discussion of the prospects of a draft-- something McCain's plans absolutely guarantee-- than in Obama's lack of skill on the bowling alley. (John Stewart actually showed a clip of some Fox talking head suggesting he should have "stuck to the hoops.")
Last week I was reminiscing about my very first arrest, which was for protesting against the draft in 1967. If the media is able to mislead voters drastically enough so that McCain actually gets into the White House, there will be many more arrests at many more protests all over America.
McCain's policies-- whatever the meaning about his constant rhetorical stumblings about Iraq and Iran, Sunni and Shi'a, and 100 years in Iraq-- can't be put in place without a military draft. (By the way, when I was protesting in 1967 Nixon was coming up with a strategy about how to make the American people vote for him-- by claiming to have "a plan." McCain also claims to have "a plan"-- to capture Osama bin-Laden-- so one wonders why he doesn't share this with his pals George W. and Cheney.)
Republicans are forever hectoring about how we should just do whatever the generals tell us to. That's typical right wing cynicism since generals don't make policy in the U.S.-- elected officials do-- and since every single general who has spoken out professionally in a way that didn't hew completely to Bush-Cheney dogma has been sacked. So listen to the generals? Which ones? The Bush toadies or the ones who helped Darcy Burner come up with the Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq?
Today's Washington Post mentions a hearing yesterday at the Senate Armed Services Committee in which Army Vice Chief of Staff, General Richard Cody, put his career in jeopardy, like so many before him have done, by implicitly criticizing the incompetence of the Bush Regime.
"I've never seen our lack of strategic depth be where it is today," said Cody, who has been the senior Army official in charge of operations and readiness for the past six years and plans to retire this summer.
Bush's response is to just stay the course and then get out of Dodge... and leave it for whomever comes in after him to sort it out. McCain would institute a draft and pour billions of more dollars into the military. (I think he wants to make up for all that time he lost sitting ignobly in the Hanoi Hilton; lots of wars out there to be waged if one wants to.) The draft is the only difference between Bush and McCain I've seen in regard to Iraq.
| Also in War on Iraq | |||
| Why Is it Different When Americans Rape? Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different? Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009. |
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images. Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009. |
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial. Post by tristero. May 15, 2009. |
|