Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Puts 'Immunity' for Iraqi Government Ahead of Bonuses for American Troops

Posted by Satyam Khanna, Think Progress at 8:47 AM on January 4, 2008.


Bush, who repeatedly touts his support for the troops, is casting their interests aside in order protect his friends in the Iraqi government.
1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

In November, the Bush administration threatened that if Congress didn't pass the Defense Authorization Bill, it would have to issue furlough notices for up to 150,000 civilian workers at military bases. The Pentagon distributed a document warning that the Army may cease to function if it did not receive the funds.

Congress eventually passed the defense authorization bill before winter recess and President Bush raised no concerns at the time. But over the break, the White House threatened a veto because of language that would expose the Iraqi government "to massive liability in lawsuits concerning the misdeeds of the Saddam Hussein regime."

Ironically, Bush's refusal to sign the bill is leading to the very damaging effects that he was fearmongering about back in November. The Air Force Times reports that Bush's veto is holding up re-enlistments and causing "some bonus programs for airmen" to expire:

All re-enlistments for airmen in Air Force Specialty Codes with a selective re-enlistment bonus or those with a critical skills retention bonus are suspended until further notice, the Air Force Personnel Center announced Monday. Instead, airmen can stay in the service by signing a "30-day best interest of the Air Force extension" as needed until the defense bill is signed into law.

Those career fields include security forces, air traffic controllers, explosive ordnance disposal and a host of other positions that are undermanned or require exceptional skills.

It is expected that the bonuses will be paid retroactive to Jan. 1 once the bill is signed into law, but there's no guarantee. According to the personnel center, bonus programs are dependent upon congressional authorization and enactment into law.

While Bush vetoed the defense bill to protect the Iraqi government from liability, the Times notes that "[a]mong the people expected to seek a financial claim against Iraq were former U.S. servicemen held as prisoners of war during Desert Storm in 1991." The bill Bush vetoed upgrades military health care and provides a 3.5 percent pay raise for service members.

Already, the Iraqi government is "thanking" Bush for preserving "the immunity of Iraq." Bush, who repeatedly touts his support for the troops, is casting their interests aside in order protect his friends in the Iraqi government.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, us troops

Satyam Khanna is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
U.S. Troops Kill Six Iraqi Security Forces
The military says it was a case of "mistaken fire."
Post by Staff. September 4, 2008.
Abu Ghraib's Torture Museum = Pure Propaganda
The Iraqi government's plan to reopen Abu Ghraib, including a museum of crimes committed under Saddam is revisionist history.
Post by Fatih Abdulsalam. September 4, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Gee, Do people
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Jan 4, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now see our government is being run by assholes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NOW we see? nm Posted by: Bbear41
Dubya
Posted by: frank69 on Jan 4, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legend has it that George Washington never told a lie.
Fact tells us that George Bush never has told the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dubya Posted by: Vik
LOOK OUT BELOW!
Posted by: papananook on Jan 4, 2008 12:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The downward spiral of Bush garbage is outta control...how low can he go?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LOOK OUT BELOW! Posted by: Rod
» RE: LOOK OUT BELOW! Posted by: papananook
Jason
Posted by: JasonPie on Jan 5, 2008 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does not any one wonder that maybe this was vetoed because after looking at the fact of American POWs being able to sue for injuries, being placed into law, the Bush administration was afraid that the Iraqis and other prisoners illegally held in American jails would gain the right to sue?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jason Posted by: VZEQICVA
MCCARTHYISM
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Jan 8, 2008 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is what best defines Bush. In polite terms, Dubya is the McCarthy of US Presidents--below even Tricky Dick Nixon, who before Bush Jr, wore the crown of worst US president ever, unchallenged, for the past 37 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]