Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

On Arab Chutzpah, Kurds and Kissinger

Posted by Barry Lando, AlterNet at 12:03 PM on December 19, 2007.


To our Arab friends: How about buying Gaza instead of Citi Bank?
kissinger
Kissinger

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

From our "Plus ca change" department

--Some 90 nations met in Paris this week to pledge more than seven billion dollars in aid to the Palestinians to help the relaunched peace process. Analysts have pointed out that the new aid promised to the Palestinians, will be of little use if Israel continues to throttle the Palestinian economy with border crossings, checkpoints and the huge barrier wall.

But you’ve got to admit the Europeans who joined the Paris aid effort have to be some of the most masochistic donors on the planet. They’ve already poured hundreds of millions of dollars into various projects in the West Bank and Gaza, only to see them blown to smithereens over the past couple of years by Israeli bombs and rockets.

But why should Europeans even be raising new funds?

If the Arab states really wanted to set the Palestinian economy back on its feet they could do it all by themselves—with both hands tied behind their backs. They’re rolling in new wealth. Right now, just in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, there are more than two trillion—that’s trillion--dollars worth of hotels, condominiums, sky scrapers, artificial ski slopes and islands being built. The Emirates are spending hundreds of billions of dollars more so that each sheikh can have his own airline. At the same time they’re snapping up banks and businesses around the globe—particularly in the United States – at bargain basement prices. .

Instead of buying a chunk of Citi Bank they could have bankrolled all of Gaza.

--Attacks by the Turkish Air Force and artillery against targets in Northern Iraq have provoked a mini crisis between the two countries. The villages hit were supposedly bases of the Kurdistan Workers' Party, the PKK. Since the U.S. totally controls that airspace, Washington had to have given Turkey the go ahead. The U.S. also provides the Turks with satellite information on PKK guerrilla positions. But that makes sense, right? After all, the U.S. has branded the PKK a “terrorist” organization.
Yet, just a few hundred miles away, that very same U.S. is at best, quietly encouraging; at worst, actually aiding, a related branch of the PKK, which is carrying out the same kind of bloody attacks against Iran that the U.S. condemns in Turkey .
It’s called the Party for Free Life in Kurdistan, or PJAK. Both it and the PKK share the same goals: fighting to win new rights for Kurds in Iran and Turkey. They also share leadership, logistics and allegiance to the same PKK chief, who is currently locked up in Turkey.
Despite denials from Washington, reliable reports are that the PJAK is being secretly armed, trained and encouraged by Israel and the United States.

Different strokes for different folks.
--Henry Kissinger recently issued one his impeccably reasoned analyses of the Iranian nuclear problem and how the U.S. should handle the threat of proliferation.
An interesting stand from Kissinger—since more than thirty years ago, he played a very different role.

Proliferation in the region, of course, began not with Iran but with Israel—which developed the bomb in the 1960’s . Back then—and ever since--as Seymour Hirsch described at in “The Sampson Option,” American leaders have closed their eyes to what Israel was up to. When alerted by his intelligence agencies, for instance, Eisenhower, made it clear he simply didn’t want to know. Official knowledge would require official action.

Kissinger went further. According to Hirsch, Kissinger, like Nixon, “shared a contempt for the 1968 Nonproliferation Treaty.” Though publicly supporting it, they actually worked behind the scenes to undermine it. Hirsch quotes Morton H. Halperin, one of Kissinger’s closest aides on the National Security Council staff: “Henry believed that it was good to spread nuclear weapons around the world. I heard him say that if he were the Israelis, he would get nuclear weapons. He did not believe that the United States should try to talk them out of it.”

Digg!

Tagged as: kissinger, kurds, palestinians

Barry Lando, a former 60 Minutes producer, is the author of "Web of Deceit: The History of Western Complicity in Iraq from Churchill to Kennedy to George W. Bush." He also blogs at Barrylando.com.


Why Is it Different When Americans Rape?
Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different?
Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009.
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports
The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images.
Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009.
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War
There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial.
Post by tristero. May 15, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CHESTERTON
Posted by: Chesterton on Dec 19, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barry, you certainly are right on the money in suggesting that the wealthy Muslim states should bankroll a new and potentially healthy Palestine. But they've always had the opportunity to do so, but haven't. Why not? Because they preferred to allow their "brother" Muslims rot in camps in order to deflect the legitimate rage of their
people onto the nefarious Israelis while at the same time ensuring that a potentially radical Palestinian state would never emerge.
(By the way, can you name another group of people who were refugees 60 years ago that were not ultimately absorbed by their host populations? Of course not, and the Arab nations' cynical manipulation of the Palestinians is the reason.)
Oh, and I know you are aware that most of the European money handed over to the Palestinians over the years are in the private bank accounts of Fatah leaders--especially Arafat's. The Israelis hardly destroyed an infrastructure that never existed, thanks to the wholesale pilfering by Yasir & Co. (For confirmation, just ask any Palestinian who voted for Hamas.) Finally--about this nuclear business. Of course Israel developed atomic weapons--what would you do if you were surrounded by hostile, medieval autocratic governments who proudly trumpeted their intent to destroy you? (See any speech delivered by Arab leaders from 1948 onward).
But you're an informed guy; you know that every word I've written is true. You just choose to conveniently ignore these facts in the service of a larger agenda. If you hate Israel, say it! But stop all the selective bullshit, please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could someone define chutzpah for me? At least I can understand...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 19, 2007 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...what "wut dis be" is trying to communicate.

Chutzpah isn't on my radar. I appeal to those versed in progressivology to help me out with their current vernacular, so that I may understand.

Thanks so much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Nah. I needed the definition... Posted by: ABetterFuture
Funding Palestine
Posted by: DanoM on Dec 20, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One issue with any Arab state sending support money to the Palestinian territories is their donations are frequently tagged as funding terrorist organizations. The money officially has to go through Israel's hands, and that can put a stop to some of the transfers too.

Then again it's the Western European states, along with the USA that aided the formation of Israel as an official state, so maybe they see it as our responsibility to help out financially with a problem we helped create.

Regardless of the reasoning it's so sad that peoples, religions, government and politics have severely messed up a region that was an early cradle for civilization. Seems like civilization really hasn't progressed that far after all!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absolutely Right - let the Arabs put their money where their mouths are.
Posted by: leland61 on Dec 20, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the oil money that is flowing into Saudi Arabia alone could be used to buy all of Gaza and all of the West Bank. The trillions of dollars left over could be used to build hospitals and schools and infrastructure.

It won't happen. The Saudi's are busy spending their ready money on radical schools teaching Islamic bigotry all over the world including right here in the USA. The Saudi's, in case anyone missed the FACTS were the ones who blew up the Twin Towers. The Saudi 'royals - that's a joke' are Bushite buddies. Hello!!! is anyone paying attention.

The Arab nations are in the hands of the same corrupt bunch of people that they have been for a thousand years. Duplicitous leaders, impoverished commoners, and a thug infested religion. (Not at all unlike the thug infested Christofascists in the USA - but with more power.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

salamah mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Dec 20, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should the Arabs 'buy' Gaza? It's already theirs and will remain so. The Israelis should fix and pay for what they have been methodically and systematically destroying for 60 years plus! The only AID which they allow to get through to the Palestinians is non-Arab non-Islamic AID. Now and again the West promises to compensate the Palestinians for the destruction carried out by the Israelis. This also has to go through the Israeli Govt if such AID ends up reaching the Israeli coffers. Most pledges are forgotten before the ink dries up on the pledge documents. On the question raised about Arab countries absorbing and settling the Palestinians by changing their refugee status, had the Arab countries been doing so after each wave of Palestinians' ethnic cleansing by Hagganah and other Jewish terrorist groups including the IDF, by today, 2007, the Arab countries would have had to absorb and settle not ONLY the Palestinians but other cleansed Arabs like Egyptians from lands East of Nile, all Syrians, fifty percent of Lebanese and 60% of Iraqis from GREATER ISRAEL. Israel is the only STATE(?) on the globe which has neither DECLARED BORDERS nor a CONSTITUTION. Both the borders and the Constitution have been awaiting the forcing of Greater Israel down the gullets of the remaining Arabs with the approval and backing of the United States and the ex-Imperial states in Western Europe. BUT, if ever the Israelis come to the conclusion that it would be more profitable for them to sell real estate in Israel, the Arabs would surely make extremely ATTRACTIVE offers to buy back the ancestral homes and properties which the Palestinians have regularly and repeatedly been driven out of, non stop, ever since 1948, which is most of today's Israel!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the facts?????
Posted by: sparlow on Dec 20, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is so sad to read the comments
--despite your warning virtually every comment is vitriolic and abusive as well as only-at best- partially factual.
Alternet makes it very plain that it is also not reportorial professes one side vs. the other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chutzpah-----
Posted by: Doubtom on Dec 20, 2007 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
----is what Kissinger needs to visit a few European countries where he's wanted for prosecution as a war crimes criminal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not Buy Back Israel?
Posted by: herbal on Dec 21, 2007 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good Idea to simply buy back the Gaza from Israel. It is a bit demeaning, don't you think, to buy back what rightly belongs to the defeated, according to the Geneva Conventions? Why not buy Israel?

Analogous to Palestinians are the Northern Irish. Why? Because Palestine is an occupied territory by any legal definition. Israel has been in violation of the Geneva Accords, international law, and only the US has stood with Israel in at least 32 motions to veto censure of Israel. Any denial of occupation status of Palestine is tantamount to Holocaust denial. The question to love or hate Israel is a red herring propaganda BS. Tough love of Israel, to ensure its survival, requires peace as a replacement for the current war of attrition. Israel can be called to democratic responsibility by a country (US) that used 'liberation to foster democracy" as an excuse to unilaterally and preemptorally invade Iraq. To be a good Jew, it is not required to embrace Lukid corporatism and high tech terrorism. Why not embrace and encourage the substantial Israeli peace movement?? See: www.counterpunch.org/avnery12102007.html

It is hegemonous brinckmanship for the US to have selectively proliferated nuclear weapons to Israel. How can I say Israel's dominant Lukid party is fascist? Because special sanction is provided, in a country that is predominantly agnostic and multi-cultural, to provide special constitutional sanction to Jewish Orthodoxy.

Remember in 1948 that 20% of Palestinians were Christian (Maronite). What happened to the Palestinian Christians who numbered 20% of the population? They were not any more accepted as Israelis or treated any different than Moslems. Their property was confiscated along with their Moslem brothers with absolutely no reparation. (Ethnic cleansing has reduced their numbers to 3%.) This means that the State of Israel was created as an ethnocentric theocracy. Please note that 45% of all Lebanese are also Christian, although this fact was expurgated from all US media during Israel's last asymetrical snuff porn. Not one word for 'collateral' Christian death and maim as if all were Hizbhollah.

The claims that pre-1948 Palestine was a propaganda fraud is ludicrous. Yes, it was a vestige of pre-WWI Ottoman Empire and was cut out of a map in London with a straightedge ruler, a'la Britannia. With a common border shared with Israel, to deny one side is to deny the other!!

What of this from The Red House: In Tel Aviv "on March 10, 1948, eleven men had a meeting in the Red House headed by Ben Gurion. The eleven decided to expel one million Palestinians from historical Palestine. No minutes were taken, but many memoirs were written about that fateful meeting. A systematic ethnic cleansing of Palestine began and within seven months the Zionists managed to expel one half of all the Palestinian people from their villages and towns."-Dr. Ilan Pappe.

Dr. Pappe is Israeli born and a graduate of Hebrew University and Oxford and is currently teaching at Haifa University. He is a well known revisionist or "post-Zionist" Israeli historian who has been both acclaimed and demonized. His most recent work is A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples which documents the expulsion of Palestinians as an orchestrated crime of ethnic cleansing.

In the final analysis, there is only one solution. That is the grand superpower, United States, deploys troops from Iraq to Israel/Palestine and occupies them until ethnic strife and civil war subsides. Then the original 1948 UN border is recognized and guaranteed by the US Marines and Air Force. Anyone caught transgressing is disappeared to Guantanimo, (Habeus Corpus allowed).

Please excuse the huffed rhetoric; it is but a reflection of the AIPAC stridency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]