Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Blackwater: Hooked on Steroids, Encouraged to Murder Innocent People [VIDEO]

Posted by Adam Howard, AlterNet at 12:30 PM on November 29, 2007.


Keith Olbermann interviews Michael Ratner about his recent lawsuit against the infamous mercenary firm currently operating in Iraq.
Blackwater Killers Were Likely Juicing When They Commited Their Crimes

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

As we reported earlier this week, Blackwater and its founder Erik Prince are under fire yet again, this time for allegedly indulging in performance enhancing steroids while on the job. Lawyer Michael Ratner has sued the company on behalf of survivors and family members of victims of a brutal, unprovoked attack by Blackwater in Iraq which claimed 17 lives.

The suit accuses the company of fostering "a culture of lawlessness" among its guards and says the use of excessive force helps the company preserve a key selling point -- the fact that none of its protectees have been killed during the four-year-old war. Olbermann and Ratner elaborate on this further. They discuss how Blackwater's "willingness to kill innocent people" has been interpreted as a "strategic advantage" for the company. Check out the video to your right for more.

Digg!

Tagged as: olbermann, steroids, blackwater

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Washington Post Editorial Board Peddles 'U.S. Knows Best' Position on Iraq
The Washington Post still doesn't believe Maliki, Iraqi officials.
Post by Steve Benen. July 23, 2008.
Looking Back: Rumsfeld Praised Mass Murderers Over PM Maliki
Apparently the Bush Administration not liking Maliki isn't a new thing.
Post by Jonathan Schwarz. July 23, 2008.
Mukasey Asks Congress to Legitimize the "War on Terror"
"This is nothing but a transparent attempt to get bipartisan buy in, before the election, to the Global War on Terror."
Post by Digby. July 23, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
steroids and the shrinking penis
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Nov 29, 2007 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if ya ain't got any balls ya usually compensate with a bigger gun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Message to Olbermann's makeup person:
Posted by: cjohnson44 on Nov 29, 2007 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pfft! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Video quality
Posted by: zorro on Nov 30, 2007 2:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The feed on these videos is getting worse and worse. They are a waste of time to watch. I don't understand the technical reasons why and for, but it seems to me, if a common person like myself can't operate it with a click of my mouse, and watch it, virtually uninterrupted, it is inneffective and something needs to be done by the techinicians feeding this stuff. My computer is fairly fast, so i don't think its my end-especially, when many other video feeds come through reletavely quickly or instantly. Any technical advice?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Video quality Posted by: mike1997
» RE: Video quality Posted by: Astroboy
» RE: Video quality Posted by: Wexler
» RE: Video quality Posted by: Lauren
Private Armies, Public Liability
Posted by: Urstrly on Nov 30, 2007 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One more piece of evidence that we ought to shut down this war right now and bring impeachment charges against the vice president, who has benefited handsomely, then the president, who has condoned the whole debacle. Do we really want to set up the next president —Democrat or Republican— with the precedent of a privately run army and private suppliers who shamelessly profiteer off people's misery?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment
Posted by: Lauren on Nov 30, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is not about getting him out of office it is about cleaning up the mess.

Biden can shake his big stick, but if he won't use it to censure torture exactly WHAT is he saying.

If he won't go after Bush on torture, he is in actuality covering up his own involvement in treason. Out or conspire in the cover-up. That is the impeachment issue. They just keep using it as a game piece. It is not. It is a fundamental issue.

Also the hockey player in the nude last night, nice Indian. Loved the shirt and the man, nice. Thank you. It was an honor. But you dissed it, is it reflexive for your culture to dis our culture? I think it is. I hear more of it just now on 'Joe'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment Posted by: ad132
» RE: Impeachment Posted by: montana freeman
It's like a pre-approved credit card, except it's for murder
Posted by: Wexler on Nov 30, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get these in the mail all the time.

The Bremer team gave Blackwater pre-approval to kill anybody they feel like at the moment with impunity. The Iraqis have taken steps to rescind this, but the step that needs to be taken is this:

The US government should not be allowed to use mercenaries under any guise including "private security firms". Isn't this practice prohibited by the Constitution? I'll look it up later.

Regardless, if it's not against the law it should be.

-Wexler

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]