Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

US Military Asks Wounded Soldiers to Return Signing Bonuses

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 1:00 PM on November 20, 2007.


Steve Benen: It's not their fault they got hurt. How on earth is the Pentagon justified in asking for a refund?
030422f7203t024
Wounded

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

When Jordan Fox was serving in Iraq, his mother helped organize Operation Pittsburgh Pride, which sends thousands of care packages to U.S. troops from his hometown, which prompted a personal "thank you" from the White House. When Fox was seriously injured in Iraq, the president sent what appeared to be personal note, expressing his concerns to the Fox family.

But more recently, Fox received a different piece of correspondence from the Bush administration.

The U.S. Military is demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments.

To get people to sign up, the military gives enlistment bonuses up to $30,000 in some cases.

Now men and women who have lost arms, legs, eyesight, hearing and can no longer serve are being ordered to pay some of that money back.

I watched the report from the CBS affiliate in Pittsburgh, and I kept thinking, "This can't be right." Apparently, it is.

In Jordan Fox's case, he was seriously injured when a roadside bomb blew up his vehicle, causing back injuries and blindness in his right eye. He was sent home, unable to complete the final three months of his military commitment.

Last week, the Pentagon sent him a bill: Fox owed the government nearly $3,000 of his signing bonus.

"I tried to do my best and serve my country. I was unfortunately hurt in the process. Now they're telling me they want their money back," Fox said.

Look, if a soldier signed a contract, collected a signing bonus, and then quit, I can understand the military asking for the signing bonus back.

But we're talking about troops who volunteered, served, and were seriously injured. It's not their fault they got hurt. How on earth is the Pentagon justified in asking for a refund?

In Jordan Fox's case, he doesn't have $3,000 lying around to give the government, and his injuries are such that he had to give up on his goal of becoming a police officer.

For what it's worth, Fox's congressman, Democrat Jason Altmire, has introduced a bill to prohibit the Bush administration from asking the troops for refunds.

Mr. Altmire, D-McCandless, held a news conference yesterday at the Ross municipal building with Spc. Kaminski and other veterans to tout legislation he has authored to aid wounded soldiers.

At the forefront was a bill introduced last week and sent to committee that targets a Defense Department policy preventing eligible soldiers from receiving their full bonuses if discharged early because of combat-related injuries.

"Hard as it may be to believe, the Department of Defense has been denying injured servicemen and women the bonuses that they qualified for," Mr. Altmire said.

He said he drafted the legislation after hearing "outrageous" examples of bonuses being denied.... Mr. Altmire's legislation, the Veterans Guaranteed Bonus Act, would require the Defense Department to pay bonuses in full within 30 days to veterans discharged because of combat-related wounds.

Seems like a no-brainer.

Digg!

Tagged as: us military, us troops

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Why Is it Different When Americans Rape?
Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different?
Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009.
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports
The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images.
Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009.
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War
There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial.
Post by tristero. May 15, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How Low Can They Go?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Nov 20, 2007 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that they would ask for this money back from our wounded soldiers. The Pentagon can't account for a lot of money spent on the occupation of Iraq, Black Water and other private contractors overcharged and were overpaid and yet, the US Services wounded should pay back their bonuses. It becomes more clear that these soldiers are not valued and appreciated by the war machine that is the White House, Congress and the Pentagon. Let's give them hell about this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Low Can They Go? Posted by: CatDad
We need to scrap bad governments and dictatorships....
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 20, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..and I have a rallying point for both to set a example to the world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IcanBelieveIt
Posted by: LeaveMeAlone on Nov 20, 2007 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the administration does not get these refunds they may have to raise the tax rates on the hedge fund mangers. Can't have that. Besides, a deal's a deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IcanBelieveIt Posted by: JSquercia
LETS RECALL RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 20, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the subject of not meeting a committment, I think we should notify any and all Bush administration personnel who bailed before they met their committments that they are not eligible for the agreed upon retirement benefits because they quit long before they were old enough to retire. Spending more time with your family or going to jail are not reasons. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMFG...
Posted by: Xynyx on Nov 20, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm virtually speechless...

I think this is a green light to start shooting conservatives with "Support Our Troops" magnets on their SUV's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OMFG... Posted by: Turiye
How about getting some of that $25 billion back from the contractors?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 20, 2007 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, the ones who were supposed to "rebuild" Iraq?

US war contracts top 25 billion dollars: study

The construction and services company KBR, formally known as Kellogg, Brown and Root and a subsidiary of oil-services giant Halliburton until April, topped the list with more than 16 billion dollars in US contracts from 2004 to 2006.

Halliburton was led from 1995 to 2000 by Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the most hawkish voices in the administration of President George W. Bush in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

DynCorp International, a provider of private security services to State Department personnel, was a distant second with 1.8 billion dollars in contracts.

Washington Group International, a rival to KBR in building and engineering, was third with just over one billion dollars.

Blackwater, whose security guards were accused of opening fire indiscriminately on Iraqi civilians in a deadly September incident in Baghdad, ranked 12th with 485 million dollars in contracts.

Just ahead of Blackwater was First Kuwaiti General Trading and Contracting, which has been accused of holding foreign laborers against their will to help build the new US embassy in Baghdad. The firm denies the charge.

Topping KBR's haul, 20.4 billion dollars was awarded for services from "unidentified foreign entities" not identified in US government contracts.

The Center for Public Integrity, which says it is a non-partisan group that investigates major public issues, said it was seeking more information on those contracts through the Freedom of Information Act.


And the Pentagon is trying to stiff soldiers for their paltry signing bonuses after they've been injured? How corrupt can a government contracting system get? Unreal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the defenders of the administration?
Posted by: scurvybro on Nov 20, 2007 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're on here regularly, spewing your knee-jerk defense of whatever The Lyin' King and his administration do, and excoriating their critics. So, come on. Let's hear it.

Offer your justification of this practice. Or don't you have the courage of your convictions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absolutely Shameless
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Nov 20, 2007 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If these soldiers who did their duty and were wounded are required to return their bonuses, shouldn't the draft-dodging coward Cheney and the wartime deserter Bush, who have violated domestic and international law in numerous and outrageous ways, be forced to return their salaries and forgo their lifetime pensions?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

''That's'' the epitomy of low
Posted by: donl51 on Nov 20, 2007 6:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did they get wounded? IT's not the fault of the milatary for their wounds,right! they vacationed in a war zone right? We should pay back the pentegon,or state dept,we should all get together send in boxes upon boxes of pennies!How stupid can the Gov. get,no I mean sick! real sick.This story should be in the big newspapers where even the deadheads couldn't miss it .Front page!then lets see where their all-volunteer milatary goes,no re-ups and no joining,put simply ''what fucking bastards''

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, dude...
Posted by: Suz on Nov 20, 2007 7:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We only promised you that money because we didn't expect you to come back, you know, ALIVE and all. Now, are you 100% totally blind or can you write me a check?"

Apalling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're there to serve,
Posted by: jingles on Nov 21, 2007 2:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not to die, not to kill, but to serve. Once a plate is broken it gets put in the back or in the trash- how can anyone be surprised when a hobbling death machine treats its own like fools?
This story will be a great in a recruitment ad.
The soldiers should should sue the shirt off the army, which is so christian now, they'll get a neat coat out of it too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

on returning bonuses
Posted by: jcutler9 on Nov 21, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, does a family of a soldier killed in action have to return a portion of his signing bonus?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OUT-FUCKING-RAGEOUS!!!!
Posted by: Astroboy on Nov 21, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a great recruiting strategy!

The lines must be miles long by now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disgusting
Posted by: andrushka on Nov 21, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and appaling. I am speechless. This Aministration is already incapable to care for its injured soldiers and when they get a little money, the Pentagon wants it back. I am sorry to say but this Administration is SICK in a big way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...And I thought things could not be more disgusting...
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 21, 2007 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After this revelation, it'll be a miracle if ANYBODY enlists in the military (maybe none of them should...). However, with the actual economy being so sh**ty for millions in the richest nation on Earth, the military will still get its cannon fodder; after all, people have to eat....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I talked to someone with a "support the troops" bumper sticker
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Nov 21, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about this and all that person said is that this whole thing is LIES from Liberals (said with contempt). She refused to believe for a second that it could be true. I told her to stop listening to Rush. I also asked her if we should raise taxes to pay for this war and veterans services. Guess what the answer was? NO! That's what Dems will do if they get in. She did not understand that the war is being put on a credit card that has to be paid. I guess as long as nothing comes out of her pocket for others, just having a damn bumper sticker is good enough...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Seems like a no-brainer."
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Nov 22, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which makes it perfect for this brainless, greedy administration. Just perfect.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sacrifice
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Nov 22, 2007 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what is it that you soldiers don't understand? as long as you are sacrificing, your the greatest,bush doesn't have to send his daughters or any of his friends'kids,or the sons and daughters of any repugslickin' his ass. as soon as you are unable to sacrifice, your old news and by the way,they want a refund. Oh, what's that you say?,you're injured. go to the VA and good luck. now don't bother us we're busy savin' the country for you bunch of whiners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sacrifice Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Bill Edwards
Posted by: billbee31 on Nov 26, 2007 4:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SHAME, Shame,shame.

Bill Edwards
Warriorwalk.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]