Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Al Jazeera Strikes Back at Pentagon, Releases Unedited Footage of U.S. Soldiers' 'Bible Study' in Afghanistan

Posted by Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports at 12:00 PM on May 5, 2009.


The network released unedited tapes of the 'hunt for Jesus' one day after the Pentagon accused it of being 'irresponsible' for its initial report.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

Hours after Al Jazeera first broadcast a video showing U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan being instructed by the military’s top chaplain in the country to “hunt people for Jesus” as they spread Christianity to the overwhelmingly Muslim population, the Pentagon shot back. It charged that Al Jazeera had “grossly misrepresent[ed] the truth.” Col. Greg Julian, told Al Jazeera: “Most of this is taken out of context … this is irresponsible and inappropriate journalism.”

Now, Al Jazeera and the man who filmed the controversial material are striking back. The network has just released unedited and unaltered footage of U.S. soldiers in ‘bible study’ in Afghanistan. Jazeera describes it as “Extended footage shot by Brian Hughes, a U.S. documentary maker and former member of the U.S. military who spent several days in Bagram near Kabul.”

In Al Jazeera’s original report, Hughes addressed the fact that soldiers had imported bibles translated into Pashto and Dari. “[U.S. soldiers] weren’t talking about learning how to speak Dari or Pashto, by reading the Bible and using that as the tool for language lessons,” Hughes told Al Jazeera. “The only reason they would have these documents there was to distribute them to the Afghan people. And I knew it was wrong, and I knew that filming it … documenting it would be important.”

Regarding allegations that the sermon of the military’s top chaplain in Afghanistan, Lieutenant-Colonel Gary Hensley, where he instructs soldiers to “hunt people for Jesus” was taken out of context, Hughes said in a statment, “Any contention by the military that his words are purposefully taken out of context to alter the tone or meaning of his sermon is absolutely false.”

Hughes is completely standing by the accuracy of Al Jazeera’s report. Here is Hughes’s statement:

On Sunday, May 3, the Al Jazeera English network and I made an agreement to produce a broadcast segment from a rough cut of my documentary film. This opportunity came after a May 2009 Harper’s magazine cover story called “Jesus Killed Mohammed.” While he researched and prepared that article, I allowed the author Jeff Sharlet to view the work-in-progress documentary. Sharlet’s article brought the film to Al Jazeera English’s attention.
My documentary, titled The Word and the Warriors, is inspired by a personal experience I had while serving as a combat flight crew member during the first Gulf War. During a very difficult and emotional time at war, an Army chaplain provided me comfort and counsel. I will never forget the important advice or the man who - without questioning my own faith - helped me at a time of need.
For two-and-a-half years, I have been researching and producing this film. I have traveled the world, interviewing both military servicemembers and civilians about the important role of these religious leaders/military officers.
During April/May 2008, I went to Afghanistan. With the assistance and full cooperation of the U.S. Army, I was allowed to film at Bagram Air Field. During that time, I was always wearing press credentials, and I was always accompanied by a media liaison while filming. The media liaison staff knew everything I filmed and - as I was told by them - they filed reports every evening about what I had filmed. It was my primary media liaison, an Army NCO, who - on my first day - invited me to meet LTC Gary Hensley. Hensley, the ranking chaplain in Afghanistan talked to me off camera expressing a concern he had about allowing me to film his chaplains. At the conclusion of the discussion, he agreed that I would be allowed to embed with his chaplains and invited me to film several hours of religious services.
Those hours at the Enduring Faith Chapel included his own sermon at a service called Chapel Next. With the exception of a few minutes I could not film because I was reloading my camera or moving to position for another shot, I videotaped Hensley’s entire sermon.
Any contention by the military that his words are purposefully taken out of context to alter the tone or meaning of his sermon is absolutely false.
In recent press statements, the military also contends that - in the footage depicting the Afghan-language (Dari and Pashto) bibles - a cut was made before “it would have shown that the chaplain instructed that the Bibles not be distributed.” This is a false statement. The chaplain - as seen in the footage before the cut - instructs the group to be careful and reiterates the definition of General Order #1. After this cut he begins to organize the group for the evening’s bible study lessons.
Finally, and in my opinion most important, is the fact that EVERY FRAME of the rough cut from Bagram was provided to the U.S. Army Public Affairs Office in advance of this release. On Thursday, April 30 at approximately 1 pm EST, the Army took possession of a DVD with this footage by accepting a FedEx from me. Since Al Jazeera English first aired the piece Sunday, May 3 at 10pm EST, the Army had every frame of this rough cut for more than 80 hours.

Digg!

Tagged as: al jazeera, afghanistan, u.s. military, bagram, bibles

Jeremy Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.


Why Is it Different When Americans Rape?
Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different?
Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009.
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports
The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images.
Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009.
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War
There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial.
Post by tristero. May 15, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Common Sense here
Posted by: 2thepoint on May 5, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are talking about a muslim media outlet trying to discredit Americans occupying a Muslim country... Yep, I believe that video is unedited...*L*. Just like I believe Obama never listened to Rev Wright in the 20 years we attended his church!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Common Sense "Where"? Posted by: channing
» RE: Common Sense here Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» RE: GET OFF THIS SITE Posted by: Dak
» RE: Common Sense here Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Common Sense here Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE: Common Sense here Posted by: bonzi
» RE: Common Sense here?? Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Right on harryf200 Posted by: channing
And next?
Posted by: Xynyx on May 5, 2009 12:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So... we eagerly await the inevitable dishonorable discharges... then...

Am I missing something? Maybe being too optimistic? Jumping the gun a bit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And next? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: And next? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: And next? Posted by: HillbillyRob
» RE: And next? Posted by: seaoftears
Great job! It's best not to use fascist-controlled media to counter fascism
Posted by: channing on May 5, 2009 1:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US military became addicted to its get out of accountability free card under the Bush fascists. It appears they were caught with their pants down simply because Obama wants to play war there and grow the Afghan mission, with the military brass thinking, "We must be safe here".

For those who don't currently do so, I strongly encourage regular visits to both Al Jezeera English AND PressTV when looking at global news... it's not always that different, but they both reliably cover the non-fascist slant on everyday issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good advice! Posted by: harryf200
Harpers Article
Posted by: AJB on May 5, 2009 2:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who has not read the Harper's article mentioned in the statement, "Jesus Killed Mohammed", it's absolutely worth reading. Go pick it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:I'm on it! Posted by: Ghoulman
The War Against Islam
Posted by: Ghoulman on May 5, 2009 5:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... this is how the Bush/Cheney White House branded the war for the fundamentalists in the US (the neocon alliance with Pat Robertson sort of people, who got their 'flock' to vote for Republicans). Cheney used the weirdo tag 'Islamofascism'. Which means nothing, but plays to dimwits who have no idea. Think about it, that phrase (islamofascism) never existed until Cheney said (and Karl Rove wrote it).

There's a thread of fundamentalism in the US military cultivated by the White House. Appointments, the cleaning house of those 'not with us', and all that. It's very real, and still is. Certainly still very real in Iraq and Afganistan where US soldiers are still living in the Bush Era. How scary is that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's worse than you think
Posted by: walldodger1969 on May 6, 2009 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
info@militaryreligiousfreedom.org is showing how bad it is in the military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Miller
Posted by: milltom on May 6, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another example of why the Taliban's grass roots appeal is growing. Killing and converting for Jesus confirms the Muslim world's worst fears that the U.S. and Western presence is up to no good. The bombing is bad enough; adding Jesus makes it worse. Barack told us that he wanted to change the mental framework that got us into the war. He'd better do this pretty quickly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It goes deeper tha this...
Posted by: aladin on May 6, 2009 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fundamentalist attack on the military has been going on for several years. The academies are awash with fundie chaplins coercing cadets into attending off-duty meetings and bible study groups. These latter-day crusaders go off and do just what was shown here. It's more than scary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christians and Military
Posted by: HBoyer on May 6, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These religious leaders in the military seems to be using the young 18 and 19 year olds to recruit new christians in a dangerous country that could kill them at any moment.

Leave it up to the military to come up with stupid ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Christians and Military Posted by: Hiroak
Jesus the Centurion
Posted by: Hiroak on May 6, 2009 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to bizarro world when the x-tians are the centurions, torturers, rapist, and occupiers and the Pharasees are leading them in religious instruction.

Kill a raghead for god you morons and then rape his daughter after prayer service

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gives new meaning to...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on May 6, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the battle cry "Support the Troops."

I for one still do not understand the supporting of people who signed up to destroy another country that did not provoke an attack.

To thank them for their service is an oxymornic slogan. The "troops" do no more good or bad for this country than any other member of this society. I thank my garbage man, mail woman, etc. when they do a GOOD job.

The demagogues portrayed here are no better than the popes during the crusades.

This is what you get when you "Support the Troops" unconditionally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gives new meaning to... Posted by: willymack
Sad, but true
Posted by: willymack on May 6, 2009 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd sooner trust Al Jazeera as an accurate news source than fox noise or CNN. This is ironic in that Al Jazeera is patterned after CNN, when it was owned by Ted Turner, that is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If you actually do research... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
Bit of a problem here
Posted by: truthlover on May 6, 2009 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What they’re saying and doing and their intended methods are perfectly legitimate – except for one “small” detail:

They are the representatives of an occupying force which is largely viewed as invaders who oppress and torture them, and want to control them and their resources, and crusaders who want to kill Muslims (and do!).

It would be very different if they were doing exactly the same thing but had gone as unarmed peaceful civilians. You might not like it (of course you wouldn’t!) but there wouldn’t be the deafening clash of opposing messages, for example:

Jesus: “My kingdom is not of this world, otherwise my followers would fight – but my followers don’t fight…”
contrasted with the weapons hanging up in the background!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bit of a problem here Posted by: Quannah
» I give up! Posted by: truthlover
What do we do?
Posted by: nurse607 on May 6, 2009 12:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who can we contact about this? I'm outraged by this unconstitutional, unethical evangelism behind a machine gun.

Please let me know who to call, visit, or email with formal complaints.

Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What do we do? Posted by: Quannah
INTERESTING VIDEO TODAY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 6, 2009 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On "What Really Happened" there's a video showing a discussion/training session about how to approach the Afgan people. It's always important to be pleasant, etc. Sort of like a Tupperware salesperson. I wonder how they explain all the people, mostly women and children killed yesterday. Anyway, it's interesting and runs about 7 min. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christians Being Christians
Posted by: nobyjingo on May 6, 2009 6:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you know Jesus the Christ, then you know that any follower of Jesus wants everyone to know the love of Jesus who gave his life for ALL people.

Since the Afghans are being made to follow Mohammad, these military followers of Jesus, who were right there, wanted the Afghans also to know about Jesus, the Son of God. Nothing in the video shows anyone trying to force acceptance of Christianity, because Christianity can't be forced.

All these soldiers have done is scatter some bibles in the Afghan language as gifts to the Afghan people. Even though giving Christian bibles away is against military proselytizing rules, it doesn't seem like an unpardonable sin. Hopefully, they will be allowed to read them.

Muslims hate Christians because of the supposed Christian power-hungry Crusaders, who in the past killed lots of Muslims in the Middle East who wouldn't accept Jesus when told. These Crusaders could not have been Christians at all, but Muslims will not forget the old Crusaders or the new Bush Crusaders, which leaves the imagination short on how any of the Crusaders could be or have been followers of Jesus; so bibles seem like a good gift to the Afghan people. If they will read the bible, they will learn that Jesus is PEACE, even though a church had them inappropriately delivered by warriors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uhhhh.... Try again Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Christians Being Christians Posted by: HillbillyRob
Al Jazeera
Posted by: wint on May 6, 2009 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because Bush hated this station so badly I tune in every chance I get to get some real news from around the world. A friend went to Europe and her AOL account had on REAL news but when she got home to the U.S.A. nshe got all about Britney or who ever was the flavor of the day. To get real news now that papers have cut back you have to go to BBC or other outlets for your foreign news. The article in Harpers was really good and informative. It is a sin to have to go off shore for your news but so be it since America doesn't give a crap about news anymore just the fluff stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gimmie shelter
Posted by: gimmie shelter on May 8, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that none of the military involved raised a question or tried to stop the release tells me that most of the military must feel the way the chaplain does. They were so blinded by their belief that they failed to see what the outside would see. Mind numbing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gimmie shelter Posted by: Woodpecker