Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

21,000-Troop Surge Apparently Not Enough; Military Brass Want 10,000 More in Afghanistan

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 8:00 AM on April 2, 2009.


Gen. David Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday that a "sustained, substantial commitment" is needed in Afghanistan.
ussoldierafghanistan

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get War on Iraq in your
mailbox!

 

Did you catch that Onion headline last month -- the one that read "U.S. Troops In Iraq Excited To Finally Return To Afghanistan"? Funny stuff, for sure, but today's headlines render it just plain sad.
The Washington Post reports that the U.S. military plans to request an additional 10,000 troops to be sent to Afghanistan -- that's on top of the 21,000 already set to be deployed. According to Gen. David Petraeus, the request comes from American military commanders and has not yet been sent to the White House. If approved, it would bring the total U.S. military force in Afghanistan to 78,000. (And that doesn't include contractors.)
The Post breaks it down:

The U.S. military has 38,000 troops in Afghanistan, and the number is projected to rise to 68,000 with deployments scheduled for this year. Those deployments include a 4,000-strong contingent of trainers from the 4th brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division, 17,000 other combat troops, a 2,800-strong combat aviation brigade and thousands of support forces whose placement was not publicly announced, the Pentagon said.

News that troop commanders are requesting 10,000 more soldiers came at a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. "If you assume there is an insurgency throughout the country … you need more forces," Gen. Petraeus told members of Congress, delivering what the Post described as "sobering testimony." Securing Afghanistan and Pakistan, Petraeus said, will take a "sustained, substantial commitment."
Undersecretary of defense for policy Michele Flournoy noted that Obama "doesn't have to make a decision until the fall," while also maintaining that the administration is "open" to dramatically increasing the number of Afghan national army and police forces.
The Post has more.

Digg!

Tagged as: afghanistan, barack obama, pakistan, the onion, michele flournoy

Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and War on Iraq Special Coverage.


Why Is it Different When Americans Rape?
Steven Green and Uday Hussein both committed the same crime, so why is the media's treatment of them so different?
Post by Byard Duncan. May 22, 2009.
Rumsfeld's Pentagon Published Bible Verses on Top-Secret Intel Reports
The cover sheets featured inspirational Bible verses printed over military images.
Post by Ali Frick. May 18, 2009.
Fact: We Tortured to Justify War
There simply is no good reason why the leading members of the Bush administration should not stand trial.
Post by tristero. May 15, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?