Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Al Gore Throws Down the Gauntlet in Today's Energy Challenge Speech

Posted by Seth Colter Walls, Huffington Post at 2:40 PM on July 17, 2008.


29 Years to the day after Carter's energy speech Gore shoots for the moon.

Just after taking the stage at Daughters of the American Revolution Hall in Washington, D.C. Thursday, former Vice President Al Gore thanked a packed house for attending his speech on how to combat climate change. And then he pointed to a couple of special guests: Libertarian Presidential Candidate Bob Barr and Black Eyed Peas rapper will.i.am (he of the now-famous "Yes We Can" YouTube video in support of Barack Obama).

Gore thanked will.i.am for making the trip from California, and praised Barr for his serious attention to the issue of global climate change.

After the crowd settled down, it wasn't long before Gore brought them to rapturous applause when he said, "We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that's got to change."

Then Gore threw down his gauntlet: "Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years."

The former vice president said his challenge is achievable and affordable now in a way it wasn't mere years ago, given the rising cost of oil and the impact of increased investment in new technologies. Specifically, Gore cited the fact that silicon needed for solar panels once fetched $300 per kilogram, but now only costs $50.

Perhaps acknowledging rumblings from Democrats who were reportedly worried that the speech comes at a time when Americans are more interested in lower gas prices than environmental lectures, Gore described his challenge as a necessary part of efforts to foster economic development and improve national security.

"Our dangerous over-reliance on carbon-based fuels is at the core of all three of [our] challenges -- the economic, environmental and national security crises."

Later, Gore claimed that exploding demand for oil in China would keep driving up the global price of the commodity, no matter how much new drilling or exploration is undertaken by the United States. "And politicians cannot bring gasoline prices down in the short term," he said.

Gore admitted that major obstacles stand in the way of his challenge. He noted that the nation's power grid is not sufficiently strong to deliver renewable energy to all parts of the country, but he said "it has to be upgraded anyway." Much more threatening to his proposal, Gore said, was our "sclerotic" politics that only takes "baby steps" instead of decisive action.

"But I've begun to hear different voices in this country from people who ... are hungry for a new, different, and bold approach," Gore said.

Outside the forum, a cavalcade of anti-Gore protest organizations lined the streets, trying to make their counter-arguments. Lyndon LaRouche's partisans handed out a glossy flier entitled "The Implications of the Gore Hoax for International Policy." Other wags took up mock-collection plates to pay for Gore's own carbon footprint. But inside the hall, Gore's references to such past government efforts as the Marshall Plan and President Kennedy's call to reach the moon tapped a vein of enthusiasm in the crowd that resulted in a standing ovation as he left the stage.

UPDATE: In a statement released after Gore's speech, Barack Obama chimed in:

For decades, Al Gore has challenged the skeptics in Washington on climate change and awakened the conscience of a nation to the urgency of this threat. I strongly agree with Vice President Gore that we cannot drill our way to energy independence, but must fast-track investments in renewable sources of energy like solar power, wind power and advanced biofuels, and those are the investments I will make as President. It's a strategy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and cannot be outsourced, and one that will leave our children a world that is cleaner and safer.


Obama Announces 'Economic Recovery Plan' to Create 2.5 Million Jobs
"It is time to act. As the next president of the United States, I will."
Post by Staff. November 22, 2008.
Just How Destructive Will Bush's Last-Minute Deregulations Be?
Bush admin pushing "midnight regulations"
Post by Staff. November 20, 2008.
Ultimate Snub Fest: World Leaders Refuse to Shake Bush’s Hand During G20 Photo-Op
CNN's Sanchez compares Bush to the most unpopular kid in high school.
Post by Ryan Powers. November 20, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WE ARE READY, AL!
Posted by: Rosasharn on Jul 17, 2008 3:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are ready, we have been ready, and we need to make the changes NOW. America is soooo tired of the same old greedy nonsolutions. We've got to have Al in the administration, to lead us across the great water of ambivilence, to reach a new world where corporations are not calling the shots. In fact, where corporations are shot down, to the size the Constitution provided for: that of short term for the purpose of immediate needs only - then DISSOLVED. Come on, Al! We've seen enough to know that today's existence is all on borrowed time. New Deal! New Deal! New Deal!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE ARE READY, AL! Posted by: Mort D. Fame
» RE: WE ARE NOT READY, AL! Posted by: edith
» Dear Edith... Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: WE ARE NOT READY, AL! Posted by: goldengrain
Carbon-Based Fuels
Posted by: pdxjoe on Jul 17, 2008 5:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a good choice of words. It captures not only petrol-based gasoline and the like, but ridiculous biofuels and ethanol. Practically all our energy comes from the sun. It is about time we harness that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Carbon-Based Fuels Posted by: Lauren
Gore's not an environmentalist ! He's a FRAUD !!
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 17, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The asshole supported NAFTA, did nothing when his boss allowed Big Auto to "voluntarily" cut emissions and improve its mileage, supported the DEA bombing of the hemp farm in South Dakota and strongly expressed his opposition to hemp despite the fact that hemp is actually good for the environment and the economy, sat by while both parties killed Kyoto, failed to turn his energy guzzling house to be more efficient until the FAT PIG SHIT got hammered for being a hypocrite, etc ... Gore's not an environmentalist ! He's a POMPOUS FRAUD !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unemployed? Get your unemployment benefits from Al!
Posted by: edith on Jul 18, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assume Gore refers to only electricity transmission in his demand for no-carbon production in 10 years. Are factories included?

All facilities besides utilities that produce their own electricity? There is no realistic prospect of cheaper alternative fuels to nuclear and coal to produce the bulk of our energy, including electricity, in that short time period. Higher power costs ladled on the inevitable inflation we will suffer as the dollar fades thanks to the debt ridden society Al Gore helped to create in his career as a Big Government Senator and Vice-President. As unemployment shoots up in either an Obama or McCain Administration, I suggest if you lose your job and for some strange reason don't get another job of equal value quickly, please email Al Gore for your unemployment check, or perhaps a supplement to said check. As inflation rockets thanks to the no carbon demand of the King of Green, he owes you a bit to keep the value of your unemployment check constant. He can afford it-what is it? $200,000 is the honorarium to hear this bag of wind whose speeches produces enough heated air to power a power plant or two.

Al, everytime you open your mouth, 1) I duck and 2) I pat myself on the back for voting for Ralph Nader in 2000. Al, you wanted to be President SO badly didn't you? Never, you power hungry demagogue, never.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» An ICY end? Posted by: edith
» RE: An ICY end? Posted by: djnoll
» RE: An ICY end? Posted by: edith
$50 Polysilicon
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Jul 18, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a reason polysilicon was fetching more than $300 a kilo: demand. And that was only the demand from 2007, when oil jumped to new unforseen heights. Since then, a number of new poly plants have been built, and more are being built.

Guess what Al? Polysilicon production is one of the most energy intensive industrial processes.

Any number of factors could drive polysilicon prices back up. Especially any serious push toward alternative energy. However, if we do not get that push, these poly producers will start losing massive amounts of money, and they will lose capital to fund further expansions. The market is counting on an explosion of demand for solar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wouldn't we all be better off by using renewable energy?
Posted by: KMyers on Jul 18, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notwithstanding his support of NAFTA, his hypocrisy,etc and all the other criticisms from other posters of Al Gore the man, would not his plan that we attempt to move away from oil and try to take advantage of solar and wind power make us better off? Even if the whole idea of global warming is false wouldn't we still be much, much better off by using renewable energy instead of oil? Ignoring all of Gore's failings is not what he saying true in terms of ending our dependence on oil and tapping renewable energy sources such as the sun and wind?

Of course we are!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who knows? Posted by: edith
» Right... Posted by: buffeliscious
Criminal Prosecution for Oil enablers- Past & present
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 18, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the last 30 yrs we have been placed in danger by those who live off the M.E royal Regimes. The Oil industry is not alone as criminals in this Mass Treason- Big 3, Political Whores and investors.
They have not only crippled our economy, but placed US in harms way (9/11)to satisfy their Profit margins. Treason. This Quest for World Domination via Oil has led to Genocide, War and Global Destruction. All those involved should be finally brought to justice for their facititattion of War crimes and crimes aganist humanity and nature!Get out the Recycled Paper plates the Silver Platters are too good for them!If they are already Dead, try them anyway- let their High Crimes follow them into history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hmmnn... Posted by: buffeliscious
Charlow
Posted by: Charlow on Jul 18, 2008 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am with Gore 100 percent on this. Unlike the late 1970s when all of our renewable technology was developed, the industry now has real Wall St. and venture capital behind it. We don't need to invent anything new to make this possible. We have been asleep for 30 years, so we need to get to where we already could have been if we hadn't been sold a bill of goods on energy by Ronald Reagan who literally pulled the plug on all our renewable R&D. We were the undisputed world leader on all this then. Now, we are behind all of the other developed countries. Which country is the most advanced in solar now? Germany, all of which is farther north than our northernmost states.

The other sad part of this is that had we continued on the solar/renewable path that we had been on, I firmly believe that China and India would have emulated that model as they developed, instead of becoming the fossil fuel hogs that they are now. If renewables weren't good enough for us, I expect they thought there was no reason for it to be good enough for them either.

Regarding industrial generators of electricity, there is enough wasted energy now in the industrial sector, that if all of that economically viable energy were to be captured and made available for use, rather than just be dumped into the air and water, the analysis of Recycled Energy Inc. from the Chicago area has shown that we would never have to build any of the much-more-expensive coal fired power plants that some utilities are starting to say we need.

What we need here are good engineers and engineering financial analysts who will put together all the details of what needs to be done. Talking heads, including one I heard on Canadian radio last night, from the American Enterprise Institute, were talking about the impossibility of the Gore proposal. He did not present one shred of evidence to back up his assertion. I say, let's pull together and figure out down to the smallest detail how to do this. After all, what do we have to lose?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Charlow Posted by: Lauren
» Sink the Tankers? Posted by: edith
So Ronny RAYGUN took the solar panels off the roofs of the White House? And Clinton? Gore?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 18, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those two DLC hacks didn't bother to put them back on once they took office in 1993. Gore would never have bothered even if he were president this decade. Al Gore is nothing but all talk and no help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cornucopian thinking
Posted by: toddcory on Jul 18, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not one word about conservation and efficiency upgrades and population reduction first. This is typical cornucopian thinking. There is NO WAY renewables will be able to replace our consumption. Time to power down first and then meet the essentials with renewables as best as is possible.

Todd

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just imagine. . .
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jul 18, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .where we'll be after the entrenched economic elite ignores environmental problems for ANOTHER 29 years. Up to our asses in seawater, choking on coal-fouled air, and broiling in endless heatwaves. Oh yes; and probably fighting endless wars over energy and religion. Gee, I can hardly wait.

What worries me, though, and should worry every family, is that in 29 years I'll be close to departing this mortal coil -- but my children won't be; they'll be suffering for what we fail to do today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BA
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 18, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great political speech, could do without the applause, but all true.
I agree that Al's solutions are again supply side. Where he needs to make a quantum leap is in his thinking is on consumption.Nothing about reducing Highway speed limits for at least a year to see how much gasoline the nation saves burning.I think the 55 mph speed limit of the 1970s is associated with political suicide and that is why people like Al stay away from suggesting it. But to be sure, it is the best thing America can do right now to cut greenhouse gases and to reduce demand for oil in the US.
Best auto efficiency is about 55 to 60mph, trucks 55mph on freeways and rural roads.
Fewer accidents as well, fewer insurance pay outs fewer EMT responses reducing demand on infra structure etc etc........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BA Posted by: edith
The Perfect Storm
Posted by: djnoll on Jul 18, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whoever becomes president next, if anyone at all will be allowed to, will be faced with an impending Perfect Storm - climate change, oil depletion, and economic collapse. Probably not completely within the next two terms, but the major fault lines will open and the storm will gather strength. Let's look at a few of the components of this Perfect Storm that we are seeing already: the housing collapse; drought, flooding, horrific storms and weather changes; high, and getting higher, unemployment; food resource depletion; skyrocketing oil prices; and the beginning of the baby boomer retirement. This is just the tip of the iceberg, people.

Al Gore wants to create a drive that will address a couple of these issues: climate change, energy dependence on oil, and tangentially, unemployment and food supplies. If we do not take a serious look at the manner in which all of the fault lines come together, and address these issues as a collective whole with radical and dynamic efforts now, we cannot avoid the Perfect Storm when it truly hits.

Because it will hit, as soon as the first Baby Boomers start doing mandatory withdrawals from IRAs and 401K's so that they can cover the costs of living. With the Bush Administration having so generously allowed illegal immigrants who can prove they paid into SS adding some 12M people to those roles, we will see one of the largest drains on our SS system in history in 2017, so how are the companies going to pay for the expansion of power systems, job creation, and thousands of other things we take for granted? Couple this with an ongoing dependency on oil, which in 10 years could be available only to the very rich and to government agencies because of its price, and you will find that unless you local food supplies, you will be going very hungry, and forget trying to live on Social Security, you won't be able to.

While Al Gore may not be someone you readily agree with, he does point out that some of these problems must be addressed now. Even Jimmy Carter 30 years ago recognized this, but still we have accomplished very little in terms of moving forward, despite all the money that could have gone to these efforts instead of wars and bank and oil company subsidies. It is time that not only Al Gore demanded a dynamic, concerted change, but that all American demand such a change. Look around you - McMansions that suck up fossil fuels like sponges; wars to get more oil when that money could have built enough solar plants like the one in New Mexico or wind farms like the ones in Kansas to power this nation; schools that no longer teach our children to think, but coach them to pass tests; and a Social Security Trust Fund that has been raided by this Administration to fund it various failed programs and wars. If you think that private contract mercenaries are worth funding or Pelosi's husband needs another government contract in exchange for immunity, then you will force us all to live with the consequences. Al Gore and Jimmy Carter are and were the canaries in the coal mine. Maybe it is time we paid attention and get ourselves out of this mess instead of waiting for Washington to do it for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gore's house? Posted by: billwald
» RE: Gore's house? Posted by: djnoll
Proof Al Gore is a fraud
Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus on Jul 18, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK maybe not exactly Al Gore is a fraud but Global Warming/Climate Change is a fraud.

The IPCC is a political organization which has manipulated the science.

Please read the following from the American Physicals Society forum

http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/editor.cfm

And this from the July 2008 issue of P&S
Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered
By Christopher Monckton

Of course they wrote a disclaimer; it's not easy going against the status quo.
"This article has not undergone any scientific peer review. Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article's conclusions."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not proof of anything! Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: Not proof of anything! Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus
This will never happen,
Posted by: james2021 on Jul 18, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Repubwican war makers, and the Giant Oil companies will not take kindly to eliminating their whole reason for staying in business.

Steal all the oil you can, and use the US armed forces to enforce this robbery.

There is just too much at stake to allow a switch out of the monopoly world of oil and arms.

Would be interesting to see what happens in the middle east once Oil is made unnecessary.
There are alternatives for making plastics, and oil isn't good for much of anything except for buring as fuel.

Would have been an interesting world, but will never happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S ABOUT TIME!
Posted by: Voicedude on Jul 20, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....'nuff said!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]