Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McCain's Shifting Stance on Immigration Continues With 'Dream Act' Flip-Flop

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 3:41 PM on July 15, 2008.


"I do ask for your trust," McCain says to Latino audience ... right before lying to everyone in the room.
dreamact

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

John McCain, recognizing the importance of Latino voters in the upcoming election, spoke to the National Council of La Raza yesterday. He told the audience, "I do ask for your trust," adding, "I think I have earned that trust."

I know McCain often has a dry sense of humor, and in this case, I can't help but wonder if he was kidding.

We've already talked about McCain's efforts to mislead the audience about his on-again, off-again support/opposition to comprehensive immigration reform. But after his speech, McCain opened the floor to about 15 minutes of Q&A. A young woman asked whether the Republican senator would support the Dream Act (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act), which gives undocumented young people a chance to earn U.S. citizenship by going to college or enlisting in the military.

McCain didn't hesitate to endorse the legislation.

That's clearly the right position for McCain to take. The Dream Act should be a no-brainer: "Roughly 65,000 children graduate each year from high school into a constrained future because they cannot work legally or qualify for most college aid. These are the overlooked bystanders to the ferocious bickering over immigration. They did not ask to be brought here, have worked hard in school and could, given the chance, hone their talents and become members of the homegrown, high-skilled American work force. The bill is one of the least controversial immigration proposals that have been offered in the last five years."

But what McCain neglected to mention is that he already promised conservative activists that he opposes the Dream Act, and would have voted against it had he shown up for work last fall.

In fact, it was captured on tape.

The audio in the latter portion of the clip is from a conference call McCain held with right-wing bloggers in October, in which he vowed opposition to the Dream Act -- in addition to opposition to the same comprehensive immigration proposal he now claims to support.

When the National Review asked McCain about the Dream Act, McCain said, "I would have voted against it. I have said a thousand times, I have heard the message from the American people."

The man is just shamelessly dishonest. McCain co-sponsored the Dream Act, then refused to vote for it, then promised to oppose it, then promised to support it. And just to add a little irony to the whole situation, McCain then concluded, "I do ask for your trust."

Now, under normal circumstances, one might wonder whether McCain will be pressed to explain himself today, maybe with a clarifying press conference. But that's almost certainly not going to happen.

Part of this, I suspect, is because the media just prefers to go easy on McCain. But the other part of the problem is, I have a hunch reporters aren't following the race as closely as we are. That may sound silly -- they are paid media professionals on the campaign beat -- but I genuinely believe they're not especially well informed.

When I heard McCain vow to support the Dream Act, I immediately knew he was abandoning a pledge he'd made during the primaries. When the reporters who travel with McCain heard it, did they notice the same problem? Do they even know what the Dream Act is?

It's one reason, I believe, that McCain is so reckless with his rhetoric. He not only assumes the media has given up on holding him accountable, but he also assumes reporters aren't quite sharp enough to keep track of minor policy details. On this, McCain is probably right.

And what if I'm wrong? What if campaign reporters really do know what the Dream Act is, and knew immediately that McCain is making completely contradictory promises to different groups at different times? That would speak to reporters' competence -- but it wouldn't explain why not one of them thought to mention it in their reports on McCain's La Raza appearance.

AlterNet is a non profit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by our writers are their own.


Henry Rollins and Paul Waldman Spurn the Media's Love for McCain
From Friday's episode of Meet the Bloggers
Post by Robert Greenwald. September 6, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
GOP Vetting Emporium and Taco Stand
Come for the vetting, stay for the tacos!
Post by Brave New Films. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Seems a correct impression of the press.
Posted by: jonnymil on Jul 16, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is at least as bad as "I voted for the $87 million before I voted against it." Only, it isn't a one-sentence flip-flop, and it is a real flip-flop.

Things like this make me not understand why anyone even thinks this should be a close election. This should--and just might--be a blowout. Makes me wonder if the national press corps covering campaigns are deliberately working to keep the election close.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RobJ
Posted by: rwjaxon on Jul 16, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though there is little doubt that the media gives John McCain a free pass on much that he says and does which perhaps, as you suggest, is due to the media's ignorance, there is another possible explanation of McCain's flip-flops. It is simply that McCain is not very bright and does not actually remember what he said earlier or may not even understand the import of what he has said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: obJ Posted by: daniel w vermillion
The big media companies and the politicians...
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jul 16, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big media companies and the politicians, on both sides of the aisle, are hand-in-glove, IMO. Republicans, especially, with their subservience to big corporations and the wealthy, are not interested in spreading information to the public. Increasingly, Democrats aren't much better. The big media moguls don't want to rock the boat, since they benefit from this arrangement. The public interest? What's that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Dream Act
Posted by: indepentent on Jul 16, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Do they even know what the Dream Act is?"

I'm sure they thing the Dream Act, is:
Lambchop
Bruce Springsteen
Justin Timberlake
Beyoncé
Eminem
The White Stripes
The Neptunes
Timbaland
OutKast
The Flaming Lips

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another joke from McCain
Posted by: xmvince on Jul 18, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He had his fingers crossed the whole time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]