Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Tonight on GRITtv: The New Yorker's Obama Cover Controversy

Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Films at 2:00 PM on July 14, 2008.


Laura Flanders, Hendrik Hertzberg, and Danny Schechter discuss the magazine's inflammatory cover.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Laura Flanders talks with Hendrik Hertzberg of The New Yorker about the magazine's inflammatory Barack Obama cover, including a response from Danny Schechter of mediachannel.org.

Watch the full interview tonight on GRITtv.org

Digg!

Tagged as: satire, barack obama, laura flanders, the new yorker, hendrik hertzberg, danny schecter

ZP Heller is the editorial director of Brave New Films. He has written for The American Prospect, AlterNet, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Huffington Post, covering everything from politics to pop culture.


Fox, CNN, CBS Reaction Groups: Obama Won
Who won the debate? It's looking like a clean sweep for Obama.
Post by Sam Stein. October 7, 2008.
McCain Shows Disdain at Debate: Calls Obama 'That One'
Sounds like McCain is buying into the hate rhetoric spouted at his own rallies. Click through for more analysis.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 7, 2008.
BushCo on Whether the Country is in a Recession: 'Don't Know'
Bush and his administration have long resisted admitting that the economy is in trouble by quibbling about the technical definition of "recession."
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
JEWS defending and manipulating the truth
Posted by: govfoe on Jul 14, 2008 2:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOOK - if this cover were Joe Lieberman looking like Abe Lincoln in a top hat and curls - banging his head against a wall in Jerusalem....

tell me readers... would it have been published?

of course not... and if it were the New Yorker would be shut down for lack of advertisers after the Jews got through with them.

NOW - anybody gonna tell me the Jews on this panel are being HONEST?

not a chance in GAZA -- I'm disgusted with the level of political discussion in this country.

Jews are controlling the message and even the spin on their own treachery.

disgusting..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The cover will be remembered, not the breezy explanation by a self-serving editor
Posted by: Lector on Jul 14, 2008 11:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New Yorker is owned by Conde Nast, part of the conservative oligarchy that owns and runs the American press. The New Yorker may not be written for the working class but the image will be passed on to them – and images are powerful. They will remember the image and forget the explanation. The irony that the cartoon was supposed to depict will be lost on an electorate that voted for Bush twice. This cover will probably appear on dozens of the right wing websites 'proving' that their concerns about Obama are well founded. I wouldn’t be surprised if the New Yorker has just sealed the election for John McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Offensive - gross and most unnecessary
Posted by: seagypsy on Jul 15, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I absoltuely agree - This did more to hurt Obama than anything else possibly could. The New Yorker has committed a gross offense - they are right wing, elitist and offensive. I will never read another issue just on principle. They have crossed the line - AMerica is on its downward fall - just like the Roman Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lighten up, people... Posted by: buffeliscious
It legitimizes the whackjob lies
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 15, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't see the lies spread among the fringe whackos being illustrated on their cover about anyone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone who thinks...
Posted by: buffeliscious on Jul 18, 2008 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this cartoon is some indication of the New Yorker's "conservative" political views doesn't read the New Yorker. Racism and Obama-bashing are not their usual trade. Politically, the New Yorker is a friend to the cause of "hope and change" in our current political climate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here here!
Posted by: buffeliscious on Jul 18, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let it be!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]