Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Says No To Public Financing

Posted by Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet at 7:51 AM on June 19, 2008.


Asks supporters to help him run first presidential campaign in decades without public funds.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama (D-IL) has rejected using $80 million in public funds for the fall campaign.

Obama said in a statement released today that he supports public financing, but not the current system for presidential candidates where independent groups can spend unlimited millions while candidates who take the public funds are bound by spending limits.

In 2004, Sen. John Kerry, (D-MA), that year’s democratic nominee, accepted public financing but ran out of money after the primaries and before the party’s convention, after which the public funds become available. That shortfall allowed the GOP to portray Kerry in unfavorable lights to voters while Kerry was unable to respond with his own television commercials.

Obama’s decision will surely be controversial.

Here are his remarks:

Hi, this is Barack Obama.

I have an important announcement and I wanted all of you – the people who built this movement from the bottom-up – to hear it first. We’ve made the decision not to participate in the public-financing system for the general election. This means we’ll be forgoing more than $80 million in public funds during the final months of this election.

It’s not an easy decision, and especially because I support a robust system of public financing of elections. But the public financing of presidential elections as it exists today is broken, and we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system. John McCain’s campaign and the Republican National Committee are fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs. And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations.

From the very beginning of this campaign, I have asked my supporters to avoid that kind of unregulated activity and join us in building a new kind of politics – and you have. Instead of forcing us to rely on millions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs, you’ve fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford. And because you did, we’ve built a grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans. We’ve won the Democratic nomination by relying on ordinary people coming together to achieve extraordinary things.

You’ve already changed the way campaigns are funded because you know that’s the only way we can truly change how Washington works. And that’s the path we will continue in this general election. I’m asking you to try to do something that’s never been done before. Declare our independence from a broken system, and run the type of campaign that reflects the grassroots values that have already changed our politics and brought us this far.

If we don’t stand together, the broken system we have now, a system where special interests drown out the voices of the American people will continue to erode our politics and prevent the possibility of real change. That’s why we must act. The stakes are higher than ever, and people are counting on us.

Every American who is desperate for a fair economy and affordable healthcare, who wants to bring our troops back from Iraq. Who hopes for a better education and future for his or her child, these people are relying on us. You and me. This is our moment and our country is depending on us. So join me, and declare your independence from this broken system and let’s build the first general election campaign that’s truly funded by the American people. With this decision this campaign is in your hands in a way that no campaign has ever been before. Now is the time to act.

Thank you so much.

The campaign of Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), released these comments in response.

"Today, Barack Obama has revealed himself to be just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient for Barack Obama.

"The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people. Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics.

"Barack Obama is now the first presidential candidate since Watergate to run a campaign entirely on private funds. This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system."


McCain Campaign Finally Agrees to Send Spokeswoman to Rachel Maddow Show
It's about time.
Post by Ali Frick. October 6, 2008.
Tina Fey as Sarah Palin in VP Debate on SNL
SNL's version of the vice presidential debate starred Queen Latifah as morderator Gwen Ifill.
Post by Staff. October 6, 2008.
The Return of McCain's Keating 5 Scandal
A new documentary highlights McCain's involvement in the S&L crisis.
Post by ZP Heller. October 6, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Special Interests
Posted by: judithkrain on Jun 19, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bitter disappointment. He might as well pick Clinton as his running mate as opting out of public financing is the first step to business as usual under an Obama administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Special Interests Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Special Interests Posted by: mkdelta69
» Please! Posted by: Blondinista
Well, that ensures he won't be beholden to the public doesn't it?
Posted by: Prophit on Jun 19, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess he is getting enought from the Wall Street Bankers, globalists and corporations to pass on the public financing. I wonder how that will translate into who he is beholden to???

I would love to hear any guesses on that....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: She lost...get over it! Posted by: jimidee
» RE: Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: Posted by: mkdelta69
So McCain tries to opt out of public financing
Posted by: carolcarre on Jun 19, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and that's OK. But he flip flops on it, so that's not OK. He just wants to have his cake and eat it too.

By the way, anyone who really thought Obama wasn't a real politician wasn't paying attention to his history in Illinois.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Questions...
Posted by: JDMB on Jun 19, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure what the fundraising situation is between Obama & McCain at this point; the Republicans have usually managed to get more money than the democrats, and thus outspend them, and thus frame the message as they want (Kerry, case in point). Obama is trying to preempt that, but can he raise enough in the long haul to compensate for the federal funds McCain will receive (and spend)?

As for McCain's response: The flip-flopper actually said that?! "...just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient ... true test of a candidate ... is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word ..." And isn't it ironic that a Republican invokes Watergate to try to tar his Democratic opponent? And what are the "... far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system."?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questions... Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Questions... Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE: Questions... Posted by: Sissy
Obama's Pragmatism
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 19, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I first heard this story from the MSM, I was immediately skeptical so I investigated further at what he meant by foregoing public funds. What I discovered was that had John Kerry done the same in 2004, he might have had enough funds to counteract and go on the offensive against the swiftboat contingent. Though it sounds bad on its face, what Obama's really doing is using the means to beat McCain using OUR public funds rather than having his limit capped at 80-plus million dollars. Keep in mind Obama's track record on campaign financing and he's been pretty consistent from what I've seen. His primary campaign funds came from US, the public, and it has been something to the likes the political process has never seen.

We all know that McCain will do and say whatever it takes and though he claims to want to take the high road, he's certainly not putting a screeching halt on the 527 wack jobs who are still scaring the crap out of the Archie Bunker clones who are convinced that Obama is a Muslim.

Besides as we all know and he has said before, the system of public financing as it stands now is broken and we have all seen the Repuglicans use it to their advantage. The bottom line is that I want Obama in the White House because we've had eight years of Captain DumbAss and we've reached a critical point. I don't know about you, but I'm going to continue to send my 20 dollars. I may have moments of idealism, but I am also a pragmatist at heart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ahhhh, ... research before....LOL Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: Obama's Pragmatism Posted by: sui_generis
Interesting
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Jun 19, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see this as a bad thing, necessarily.
Nor do I see Obama taking a "politics as usual" tac with this decision.

1. The DNC has announced that it will not accept contributions from lobbyists or registered foreign agents. According to "Hightower's Lowdown," Obama has not taken one dime of PAC money in his campaign to date, and if he follows the DNC lead (which was his idea to begin with!) and puts some restrictions on the sources of campaign contributions, there should be no serious problem.

2. Too many people regard "public financing" as a kind of panacea and have thus become complacent (oh! we've got public financing, so everything MUST be above board!) The GOP will cry foul mainly because they can't even begin to match Obama's fund-raising this year, but were the shoe on the other foot (as it has been more often than not) they'd do the same thing with some sort of bogus hypocritical moral-high-horse excuses.

I'll be making a modest contribution to Obama's campaign, along with hundred of thousands of others. The alternative is too ghastly to consider.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting Posted by: mkdelta69
» RE:Not really... Posted by: jimidee
very interesting
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Jun 19, 2008 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how alternet titled this,
another title (a more accurate title) would be "OBAMA OPTS OUT OF PUBLIC FINANCING PROMISE", but alternet chose to simplify it not to include the flip-flop.

Obama said in a statement released today that he supports public financing, but not the current system for presidential candidates where independent groups can spend unlimited millions while candidates who take the public funds are bound by spending limits.

ya mean like moveon.org

for the record, i am a longtime ardent opposer to anything McCAIN including his fake torture stuff, but this is getting ridiculous, these similarities between the dems and repubs, makes you wonder why no impeachment, no end to the war, no end to blackwater's contract....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: very interesting Posted by: sui_generis
» RE: very interesting Posted by: mkdelta69
Barack, say it ain't so!
Posted by: wildbill on Jun 19, 2008 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Already both the "other guys" and the "liberal media" are saying that Obama has reneged on his promise to accept public financing and its limits, and that he's doing this because he has seen that he can raise a lot more from those of us who've sent him $25 donations than he could with the public financing limits, a lot more than he thought he could when he first got into this! And his rationalization is that "the system is broken." Say it ain't so, B.O.!

Remember the ending of the movie "The Candidate" with Robert Redford? Remember the ending of Orwell's book Animal Farm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Obama Reinvented Campaign Finance
Posted by: davekmv on Jun 19, 2008 11:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an amazing map that is quite timely given the announcement today. It shows what made it possible for Obama to be the first major candidate to decline the public financing system for presidential campaigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Masters
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 20, 2008 8:00 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do people expect from a guy who had his underlings kidnap a plane full or donkey journalists, mostly women while he and Hillary met their masters at Bilderberg? That's where he got his marching orders and only God can help us from what those bastards have in store for us. Change in color is not change in substance when the world is ruled from behind curtains.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]