Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

VA Ignores PTSD in Women

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 4:00 PM on May 27, 2008.


The VA will not consider trauma from sexual assault a cause of PTSD.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

As a female soldier or Marine, you prepare for service with a lot of training with your squad, a lot of extra time in the gym, a lot of mental and physical preparation. But nothing could prepare you for an assault ... a sexual assault ... from one of your fellow soldiers.

What do you do, as a female soldier, when the VA folks in charge of your treatment don't think you merit psych care in the wake of this trauma? Via AnchorageDailyNews:

I asked the briefer, a VA psychiatrist, whether the VA also considered Military Sexual Trauma an experience that can lead to PTSD. He replied "no."

I looked at the physician with amazement. Many peer-reviewed journal articles assert that Military Sexual Trauma, or MST, is especially associated with PTSD. That the Veterans Administration continues to disassociate MST with PTSD is remarkable.

But it may be understandable, considering the military is a culture that ostracizes and ridicules women who "rock the boat" by reporting incidents of sexual assault and violence.

This is not an isolated opinion, unfortunately. Sen. Patty Murray, who has personal experience working with Vietnam vets in the VA system and understands the long-term ramifications of not doing this work properly, has been trying to give this issue a much louder voice on the Hill. Kudos to her. But it's going to be a long road to change.

Via NYTimes:

Women make up some 15 percent of the United States active duty forces, and 11 percent of the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nearly a third of female veterans say they were sexually assaulted or raped while in the military, and 71 percent to 90 percent say they were sexually harassed by the men with whom they served.

This sort of abuse drastically increases the risk and intensity of post-traumatic stress disorder. One study found that female soldiers who were sexually assaulted were nine times more likely to show symptoms of this disorder than those who weren’t. Sexual harassment by itself is so destructive, another study revealed, it causes the same rates of post-traumatic stress in women as combat does in men. And rape can lead to other medical crises, including diabetes, asthma, chronic pelvic pain, eating disorders, miscarriages and hypertension.

The threat of post-traumatic stress has risen in recent years as women’s roles in war have changed. More of them now come under fire, suffer battle wounds and kill the enemy, just as men do.

As women return for repeat tours, usually redeploying with their same units, many must go back to war with the same man (or men) who abused them. This leaves these women as threatened by their own comrades as by the war itself. Yet the combination of sexual assault and combat has barely been acknowledged or studied.

Last month, when the RAND Corporation released the biggest non-military survey of the mental health of troops since 2001, it unwittingly reflected this lack of research. The survey found that women suffer from higher rates of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression than men do, but it neglected to look into why this might be, and asked no questions about abuse from fellow soldiers. Terri Tanielian, the project’s co-editor, told me that RAND needs more money to explore these higher rates of trauma among women....

Walter Pincus reported yesterday -- relegated to his usual WaPo A15 page -- that there are substantial concerns about medical costs associated with military retirees and their families, and that cost-cutting in the medical care budget line is a priority for the DOD for their upcoming budget year.

Gates called the rising cost of health care "one area that not only concerns us but where we believe we have to get under control." He said the Defense Department's health-care costs went from $19.5 billion in 2001 to the projected $42.8 billion sought for next year. Within that figure, he said, are military retirees, who are eligible, along with family members, for Tricare medical and dental programs.

Call me crazy, but that should have been one of the concerns discussed long before we ever set foot in Iraq in a war of Bush's choice, shouldn't it? How many years, how many injuries and resources and lives shattered? And we are still tallying costs piecemeal, looking at the long-term consequences of our actions only as they rise up and smack us in the face. At some point, shouldn't long-term, big picture planning occur? Asking all of those "if/then" questions that we keep kicking down the road for the next administration -- the longer we put them off, the worse things seem to get.

It's too late to not go into Iraq in the first place -- that fleet of ships sailed long ago. But it isn't too late to stop treating our nation's military and all the human beings serving in it as though their needs and concerns are less important than saving face for Commander Guy. And when that big picture discussion finally occurs, will the needs of female soldiers be shoved to the side and ignored -- yet again?

(YouTube of NBC Nightly News report on PTSD and sexual trauma for women in the military and a VA treatment center for this issue.)


Hockey Mom Sarah Palin Booed — at Hockey Game
From the "Who didn't see that coming?" department.
Post by ZP Heller. October 12, 2008.
Religulous: Finally, a Movie for Atheists Like Me
Bill Maher questions religion's inherent contradictions in a new documentary.
Post by DJK. October 11, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 27, 2008 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What does that really mean? I dont think it has a medical definition. We have thousands of people with PTSD and their symptoms and experiences vary greatly. People who have never served in the military have PTSD. It's time we carefully examined and diagnosed patients and be more specific. They are all dumped into one conventient pot and then ignored. We need better diagnosticians and more specific treatments. It's just too vague. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No, it's quite specific. Posted by: Longdream
» What is it? Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: What is it? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: What is it? Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: What is it? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: What is it? Posted by: foreverhope
Great.
Posted by: Longdream on May 27, 2008 7:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next you're going to tell me they're calling it PMS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great. Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Great. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Great. Posted by: Lauren
Several Errors, Several Hurdles
Posted by: tfarnon on May 28, 2008 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) The psychiatrist who declared that MST is not a cause of PTSD according to the VA is full of manure. The VA not only acknowledges that MST can be a cause of PTSD, but has a specific inpatient program in Palo Alto, California for women veterans with PTSD.

2) The biggest problems preventing women for receiving mental health care at the VA are structural. The first obstacle is society itself, because women are not ALLOWED to give in to severe mental illness. There are children to care for, there is often a husband or significant other to care for, and there simply isn't time for a mental meltdown. Women have been conditioned to behave appropriately, or at least in a non-threatening manner, regardless of their own emotional states.

Where this becomes a problem is the way the VA triages mental health patients because the funds and staff are already overburdened. They use a Global Assessment of Function, which doesn't measure emotional pain simply in terms of mental activity. It measures a mentally ill veteran's ability to function in the world according to some fairly lax norms. Most women, since they do not engage in substance abuse to the degree men do, and do not end up in jail nearly as often, don't meet the VA's criteria for mental health care as often. Women are so conditioned to NOT act out that they don't tend to get the help they need every bit as much as male veterans. Women don't tend to scale bell towers and start shooting passers-by, they don't tend to get in fist fights, they don't tend to (notice I said TEND to--there are exceptions) engage in extremely high-risk illegal behavior, and they don't tend to keep arsenals of firearms (or even one).

The second obstacle is that mentally ill women are supposed to conform to certain stereotyped behaviors, usually timid and weepy. I had problems getting anyone to believe that I had a problem for many years because my response to PTSD/Anxiety/Depression was far more stereotypically male, manifesting with agitation and explosive anger. And that was seen as mere "bad behavior" in a woman.

Finally, there is the idea that women never see anything awful in a war zone. Well, that might have been true for the women postal clerks in Desert Storm, but it wasn't true for those of us in units where we had no choice but to operate far forward, sometimes even forward of the fighting units. I'm certain that women are exposed to even more of the kind of stressors that can lead to PTSD in Iraq and Afghanistan in the current conflicts, because the front lines are now completely nonexistent. Remember Jessica Lynch and Lori Piestewa? They were both in a "rear echelon" unit, but it didn't save them from ending up in a firefight.

Stereotyping on the part of INDIVIDUAL providers in the VA does far more to prevent adequate mental health care for female veterans than any supposed VA policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Several good points here Posted by: whathaway
2000 women serving in combat....
Posted by: foreverhope on May 28, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...have reported being raped, and those are only the ones that have reported, many don't.

A woman serving in Iraq is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than be killed by the 'enemy'.

These women have grounds and need to file a class action law suit against GWB/CHENEY and the Veteran's administration or it will just keep on.

PTSD does not go away, it is with you forever. FIFTY percent of individuals with PTSD will also acquire Fibromyalgia, a painful and devastating deterioration of the central nervous system. Fibro is still being figured out, is not so easy to diagnose and doesn't become apparent untill one is in their 40's or 50's, and people DO get it that do not suffer with PTSD. Women are more likely to get fibro but many men get it too.

To have PTSD and fibro is TERRIBLE double whammy. It can be like having the worst case of the flu ever, after a ski and motor vehicle accident but you don't even run a fever. Even the light from the tv or what others would consider small noises are difficult to unbearable for those that have fibromyalgia. At it's worst not only walking but even moving a toe can be excruciating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

war kills goodness
Posted by: luzmejor on May 28, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, this story certainly disproves that old chestnut that the military goes into danger and risks death to save their fellow Americans!

Instead, it looks more as if they are letting the women fight so they don't have to worry so much about our soldiers "fraternizing" with enemy females!

The hate and disrespect for females of all ages (even babes in cradles) started long ago and goes on in even the closest of families.

Ladies, it is time to stand up and fight for your own rights. Better yet, gang up with other women to do that! That's what your phony military protectors are doing to assault you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]