Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Putting the "Super" back into super delegates

Posted by Seth Mooney, AlterNet at 8:34 AM on May 27, 2008.


Cartoon satire "White House Rocks" brings clarity, along with a campy 70's theme, to the super delegate issue.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

One critical issue of this election season centers on the idea that in a democracy, there is some kind of agreement between the People and the Government, an agreement to which both parties are accountable. The American Government hasn’t been very accountable to its People (or objective reality, for that matter) ever since the democratic process was hijacked in 2000 from voters Florida at the expense of voters everywhere.

Now, Democratic super delegates are positioned to hijack the democratic process from their own party. In response, Agit-Pop Communications has launched the first in what will hopefully be a series of hip and fact-dense videos on the super delegate problem.

It may seem like a stretch to suggest that a coup-de-tat within the Democratic Party would be as bad as the theft of the Presidency that happened in 2000. That’s certainly farther than Agit-Pop takes the "super delegate Issue" in this slick video. But one sad truth of the matter is that we no longer talk about fact that the election of 2000 was stolen because we understand that the rules of the game allowed for the theft. And it is exactly the same kind of idiotic rules that stand to erase the last traces of democratic electoral accountability from American political life now in 2008.

The Super delegates amount to 2008’s version of the US Senate in 2000. The rules in 2000 said that so long as Senators were o.k. with democracy being stolen in Florida, the concerns of Representatives were unimportant. The Democratic Party’s rules let super delegates cast their powerful votes irrespective of the democratically expressed will of their constituents within the party. In short, the concerns of voters will once again be rendered wholly meaningless, if the super delegates do what Hillary Rodham can only be hoping they will do.

What she is no doubt hoping for is the super delegates’ complicity in hijacking the democratic process from the Democratic Party. To become the party’s nominee, she needs the super delegates to show that the party doesn’t care any more about the democratic process than the Supreme Court, the Senate, or the thieves in Florida cared in 2000.

For a long time now the Democratic Party has been trying to win by beating the Republican Party at its own game. Americans have reason now, more than ever, to suspect that the Democratic Party isn’t a real alternative to the thieves and charlatans that hijacked the American Government eight years ago. Now, with Hillary Rodham’s continued campaigning in defiance of the majority of Democratic voters, and with so many of the super delegates complicit by not acting to end the charade before it can become reality, the Democratic Party may expose itself as a master of the means of Republican theft and chicanery as well.

No American alive today is likely to outlive the blemished reputation that comes along with the Bush presidency. Starting with the theft of the government from the People, the American legacy and human history have been marred. Democrats like to think that it will mean something for the Democratic Party to "take back" the White House this fall. But it only can be meaningful if a Democrat wins the White House democratically. If the Super delegates make themselves Hillary’s cronies, if they betray the democratic process as it was betrayed in 2000 by Katherine Harris, the Supreme Court, and the Senate, it will be hard to believe that "democracy in America" means much of anything at the Federal level.

Check out whitehouserocks.com for more info on the video, and to sign a petition for super delegate accountability.


Why Obama, McCain and You Should Care that Middle-Class Americans have no Idea what Congress is up to
Do you know what your member of Congress did today?
Post by Andrea Batista Schlesinger. August 21, 2008.
Poor Little Rich Man: McCain Can't Remember How Many Mansions He Has
McCain is out of touch with economic realities facing Americans.
Post by ZP Heller. August 21, 2008.
Scary: McCain Wants to Reinstitute the Draft
McCain on reinstituting a military draft: 'I Don’t Disagree.'
Post by Ali. August 20, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You gotta admit, it has been fairly close...
Posted by: Xynyx on May 27, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I still will not vote for Hillary in the general election, I'm sure there are many others like me, and she will probably drive more Republican assholes to the polls than Obama would.

If the superdelegates are so willing to throw the election, we don't really stand much of a chance. Start by replacing them as soon as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SDs may override the people in the primary
Posted by: bluepilgrim on May 27, 2008 6:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but they can't override the people in the general election!
(It takes the Supreme Court to do that.)

Democracy -- yeah ---- sure...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Facts?
Posted by: Cowardly_lion on May 27, 2008 8:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, yeah...this delegate system sucks. Super delegates can easily throw the election and I've been saying they will since the beginning. But when will we remember that america is NOT A DEMOCRACY? No where in the constitution does it state that this country is to be run as a democracy. The only reason we're supposed to pick a president is to have a leader of the military.

The President was NEVER supposed to have so much power as to decide where or on what we spend our money or anything else besides what move our military makes next. America is a Constitutional Republic where 99% of the population can NEVER tell the other 1% what to do or how to run their life. In a democracy 51% tells 49% that they're wrong.

Ever hear of tyranny of the Majority? Our forefathers were aware of the idea and even coined the phrase. They hated the idea of democracy because of exactly that reason. Freedom doesn't come under the boot of the majority. We're a free nation, not one that is supposed to follow trends. Wake up people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Facts? Posted by: revjmike
» RE: Facts? Posted by: Seth Mooney
Not so super delegates
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on May 28, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the backbones of a wet noodles--apparently the so-called super delegates aren't quite so super after all. Evidence they still have not decided to come out of their neutrality closets and DECIDE who to back. Even those whose states have voted. Talk about wusses. Democrat weenies more likely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saban's Power Ranger analogy would have been more clever satire
Posted by: DeaconJ on May 28, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story about billionaire Haim Saban offering each delegate a million dollars each if they vote for hilary puts the whole concept of "SUPER" in a dubious shadow.

Click Story for Saban Bribe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mr vermillion
Posted by: daniel w vermillion on May 28, 2008 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
did you mean, "coup d'etat"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Complete crock
Posted by: 2cynical on May 29, 2008 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece and all the accompanying comments are a complete crock of .....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]