Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Schumer: "Bush Is Herbert Hoover"

Posted by Faiz Shakir, Think Progress at 6:17 AM on March 17, 2008.


Bush's denials of economic truth means that "Americans are ill-prepared for hard times" ahead.
Sen. Schumer: Bush Is Herbert Hoover

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Video

Make Your Own O’Reilly Tantrum Remix!
DJK Brave New Films

Colbert Imitates O'Reilly's Meltdown
Huffington Post Huffington Post

The Attack of Racially Charged Republican Attack Ads
Max Blumenthal Al Jazeera

As the economy spirals downward into what many economists view is already a recession, President Bush delivered a speech this week expressing confidence “in the ability of the markets” to turn it around.

In 1930, as the U.S economy was sinking into deep recession, President Herbert Hoover said this to Congress:

Economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement. Economic wounds must be healed by the action of the cells of the economic body - the producers and consumers themselves.

In his speech this week, Bush echoed Hoover: “The temptation of Washington is to say that anything short of a massive government intervention in the housing market amounts to inaction. I strongly disagree with that sentiment. … Government actions are — have far-reaching and unintended consequences.”

The unfortunate similarities in these statements and attitudes led Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to offer this observation on Fox News this morning:

The President is indeed behaving like Herbert Hoover. We’re in the most serious economic problem we’ve been in in a very long time — much worse than 2001. The President’s hands-off attitude is reminiscent of Herbert Hoover in 1929 and 1930.

Schumer added that this has become “the Bush recession,” while Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) noted that this will be the second recession in this administration.

In an editorial this morning, the New York Times fact-checks Bush’s economic speech:

Mr. Bush boasted about 52 consecutive months of job growth during his presidency. What matters is the magnitude of growth, not ticks on a calendar. The economic expansion under Mr. Bush -- which it is safe to assume is now over -- produced job growth of 4.2 percent. That is the worst performance over a business cycle since the government started keeping track in 1945. […]

Mr. Bush was wrong to say wages are rising. On Friday morning, the day he spoke, the government reported that wages failed to outpace inflation in February, for the fifth straight month. Productivity growth has also weakened markedly in the past two years, a harbinger of a lower overall standard of living for Americans.

Bush’s “denial of the economic truth” means that “Americans are ill-prepared for hard times” ahead.

Digg!

Tagged as: hoover, economy, bush administration, bush, fox news, chris wallace, dodd, schumer

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Editor of ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report.


Make Your Own O’Reilly Tantrum Remix!
An O'Reilly Contest from Brave New Films.
Post by DJK. May 17, 2008.
Colbert Imitates O'Reilly's Meltdown
Watch the "never-before-seen" mock footage.
Post by Huffington Post. May 17, 2008.
The Attack of Racially Charged Republican Attack Ads
Fears grow over Republicans' controversial campaigning.
Post by Max Blumenthal. May 17, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
BUTat least Hoover didn't
Posted by: JSquercia on Mar 17, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But at least Hoover didn't get us into two wars that for all intents and purposes we are losing and he DIDN'T put the Country in Hock to its Number one threat .
I think the other blog about the bailout Bear Sterns says it all . The transfer of wealth from the lower and Middle classes to the Upper Class is almost complete . You have to wonder if anyone is thinking about asking those BS (how wonderfully appropriate an abbreviation ) Executives to RETURN those Bonuses they recently "earned" . What was I thinking ? That would be INSANE !!! and oh yes what was the word I was looking for FAIR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BUTat least Hoover didn't Posted by: zenbruder
wow...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 17, 2008 6:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Government actions are — have far-reaching and unintended consequences"

If only he bothered to take that stance when thinking about giving tax breaks to the wealthy.

Or perhaps when he was getting set to spread "democracy" through government actions and run up a record debt.

But thats the current model for Bush and his ilk... when they want government to be bad..its bad. When they want government to be good.. its good and necessary. They have no real principles outside of self-enrichment and the will to power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Doover Of A Hoover
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 17, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Herbert Hoover? I thought Bush was like J EDGAR Hoover! Him too, I guess.
I suppose we should be calling this the 'Vacuum-Cleaner Presidency'!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Say what you will about Herbert Hoover,
Posted by: Lloyd Drako on Mar 17, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he was not a hands-off sort of guy. He was an engineer by training, a man who put hands on and got things done, from rescuing failed mines to feeding starving Belgians to supervising flood relief along the Mississippi in 1927.

After the Crash, Hoover was urged to do nothing by his Treasury Secretary, Andrew Mellon, who declared that stocks, employment, real estate, and so on, should be "liquidated" so as to "purge the rottenness out of the system." Had Hoover listened to him, the Depression would probably have been even more savage than it turned out, but it also might have been mercifully short.

But no: Hoover sponsored countercyclical tax cuts and spending increases, supported the Fed in cutting interest rates, and got big business to agree not to cut wages in order to maintain consumer purchasing power. (The result was more layoffs than would otherwise have been necessary.) Hoover also eagerly signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, so as to "protect" American business and labor. What in fact was "protected" against was a return to prosperity for a whole decade.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what's this guy's voting record
Posted by: Joe on Mar 17, 2008 12:25 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
schumer always struck me as a say one thing do the opposite poltician

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on, wages are rising...!
Posted by: adp3d on Mar 17, 2008 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...just look at all those CEOs pay. Heck man, I'm gettin' a whoppin' 1.25% increase this year!
I tell ya, the man has fallen of the wagon...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mim
Posted by: mim on Mar 28, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an insult to Herbert Hoover. Hoover at least was honest and compassionate; he was just hamstrung by his own free-market ideology.

He was also the last openly smart Republican president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]