Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Right Wingers Try to Blame the Media for Economic Insecurity

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 7:39 AM on March 3, 2008.


Mary Matalin echoes a popular right wing talking point.
Mary Matalin Talks Bullshit on the Economy

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday on NBC's Meet the Press, host Tim Russert pointed to a new CNBC poll showing that 83 percent of the American public rates the U.S. economy as only fair/poor. Right-wing strategist Mary Matalin tried to brush off that number, stating that most Americans are nevertheless happy about their personal finances.

When liberal strategist Bob Shrum pointed out that her statement is false, Matalin switched to the well-worn tactic of blaming the media for the problem:

MATALIN: Well, there's an element of cognitive dissonance there, because if you ask them how their own personal finances are going, those numbers completely switch. Yes -- he's looking around. Those numbers are completely true. They absolutely switch on their own personal finances.

SHRUM: I think most people are getting very insecure about their personal finances.

MATALIN: That's because they're berated with these numbers.

Matalin is echoing a popular right-wing talking point. On Feb. 11, former White House adviser Karl Rove claimed that the "media has been beating the drum for years and years and years that the economy stinks. And after a while, that begins to color people's attitudes." Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) also recently tried to blame it all on the American people by saying that it's just "psychological."

Matalin's baseless assertion was quickly rebutted by her husband, Democratic strategist James Carville:

This is not something created by the media. These mortgages, these high energy costs, these pathetic employment numbers, the health care costs, food costs -- they're just killing people out there. They're not just being told that things are terrible. They're feeling this every day.

As Shrum pointed out, most Americans are insecure about their own finances. A recent Pew poll found that 53 percent rate their personal finances as only fair/poor, up from 49 percent in January. Additionally, 58 percent believe that their personal income is "falling behind" compared to their cost of living, up from 44 percent in January.

Transcript:

RUSSERT: Let me ask you about the economy, Mary Matalin. CNBC has a new poll coming out tomorrow -- Wealth in America. They ask one question -- the current state of the economy. Excellent or good, 16 [percent]. Fair or poor, 83.

In an election where the economy is central to people. And the Republicans are actually asking for a third term in the White House. What do those numbers mean to you?,/blockquote>

MATALIN: Well, there's an element of cognitive dissonance there, because if you ask them how their own personal finances are going, those numbers completely switch. Yes -- he's looking around. Those numbers are completely true. They absolutely switch on their own personal finances.

SHRUM: I think most people are getting very insecure about their personal finances.

MATALIN: That's because they're berated with these numbers. However, we haven't had the contrast yet. People do not want, as a furtherance of economic policy, the kind of centralization Obama and Hillary are proposing, they don't want more regulations, they don't want higher taxes, they don't want less trade. Maybe there's a way to help the transition in Ohio and Pennsylvania, those manufacturing states.

But when you start contrasting liberal liberal liberal -- redistributionist policies with limited government policies -- the limited government conservative policies, economics win every time.

RUSSERT: Is it the economy, stupid?

CARVILLE: Of course it is, and people are feeling it. This is not something created by the media. These mortgages, these high energy costs, these pathetic employment numbers, the health care costs, food costs -- they're just killing people out there. They're not just being told that things are terrible. They're feeling this every day.

Digg!

Tagged as: media, rove, economy, shrum, carville, matalin

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.
Donna Brazile: "I'm Not Going to the Back of the Bus!"
An impassioned speech on racial politics from last week's New Yorker festival.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.
John Cusack Tackles War Profiteers Today on Meet the Bloggers
Today at 1pm ET/10am PT.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Matalin's full of it, and it ain't sunshine!
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Mar 3, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The banana Republicans are scared to death because their rape of America's economy for their own benefit is becoming too obvious for even the casual observer to ignore.

They also realize that if enough voters get angry enough with the Republican mismanagement of the country for the last seven years (more, if you want to include the Reagan years of "piss on," I mean, "trickle down" economics), there will be a reckoning.

Most of the middle and upper income people I know have been very frightened for their jobs and homes for the last few years. The latest mortgage mess just brought it to the fore. The Right underestimates the intelligence of the average American. They can read the writing on the wall all too clearly; "You shall know the truth, and verily, it shall piss you off!"

Matalin (and the rest of the far-Right commentators) are like cats trying to cover up on a tile floor. What they have done is obvious and they fear the backlash. And well they should. When a people concludes that their own elected government is selling them up the river, very bad things happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe in Mary's crowd
Posted by: JSquercia on Mar 3, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe in Mary's crowd in DC ,those with high paying political jobs , all IS well But for the rest of us the economy stinks . Gas is going through the roof and raising the price of evertything . The Idiot in the White House claims he hadn't heard that gas could be $4.00a gallon by the summer just like his Daddy hadn't a clue about the cost of Milk.
As a senior I got a small (under 3%) raise in my Social Security benefit while the cost of living recently was said to be rising about 7% and the Government fears Stagflation . The recent Cuts in Interest rates to boost the Stock Market have resulted in CD rates plunging . The irony is the rates are so low that even WITH the interest they give you the Purchasing Power of the money is lESS than it was AND the interest is considered ORDINARY income and taxed to add insult to injury .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That must've been
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 3, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a cold night for James.

Then again, he knew what he was getting...erm, into.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That must've been Posted by: JSquercia
Why are these people even on television?
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 3, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are political operatives sent to these shows to further their own political views. It's not like they are economists! Or that they know anything more than a cursory understanding of economics! Why are they trotted out and asked these kinds of questions? Their opinions are not facts, and their job is to say anything to get their candidate elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Phony numbers all over the place
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Mar 3, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing that comes out of Washington can be believed. Inflation numbers? Cooked! Shadow Gov. Statistics, a site that backs out the statistical flim flam says that inflation is approaching 13 percent. The average person knows this by doing nothing more than going to fill up the car or buy groceries.

Our liar-in-Chief will get most of the credit for this (even though the Clinton White House helped).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Matalin: making it up as she goes along...
Posted by: diof09 on Mar 3, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This idea about "but if you ask Americans about their own finances, they'll say they are just fine" well, who is she asking? Her rich friends? I believe her line of reasoning has been confused by how Americans felt about disliking congress in general versus liking their own representative. Or perhaps she liked that comparison and just stole it for her own. Man, these people just make it up as they go along, I don't know anyone who isn't feeling some level of financial pain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes you shoot the right dog...
Posted by: pangolin on Mar 3, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the wrong reasons. In this case Mary Metelin is inexplicably correct in blaming the media for the poor economy.

The media has swallowed every cow-flop, prairie pancake, yard mine, horse muffin or other non-information comment the neo-cons (yes you Mary) have dropped on their desk and called it pie. Told us how good it tasted and that we should all have some too.

So Americans thanks to the wonders of TV and evangelical christianity ate all of that horseshit and now have one hell of a tummy-ache.
They're thinking; "who told me this would be tasty?" Yep, them media knuckleheads.

So when anybody calls the media a bunch of shills we KNOW that's true. Folks are starting to figure out who they're shills for too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» lemmings Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
So the shoe is on the other foot...
Posted by: l_m_n on Mar 4, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the media is a wonderful tool when you're destroying John Kerry. The media is a wonderful tool when you're hyping the Iraq war. The media is a wonderful tool to give Bush his photo ops on an aircraft carrier and a flooded square.

But now?

NOW it's an evil machine that plays on people's worst fears. NOW it's unfair and giving them a bad name. They created the monster, and the monster is destroying them. How does it feel? I hope it feels gooooood.

I also liked that James Carville said that mortgages were "just killing people out there".. considering that the media's other latest creation, the Iraq War, is ACTUALLY killing people out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Correct the record
Posted by: Lauren on Mar 4, 2008 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was so impressed with her statement, I wrote it down. Our transcriptions do not match, we both missed things. She's fast.

... liberal (I'm sorry it's not liberal, liberal, liberal) redistributionists policies vs limited government policies "conservative" policies/economics win every time. Q. Is it the economy stupid? A. Of course it is.

I wanted to comment on how she slips in analysis that furthers the story, or conversation in her 'people's' direction, and the others ignore and/or validate her point.

Many hear it so fast they do not catch what she has said. It certainly is not being challenged on it's assumptions. What I'd like to do, seen done more often.

But then I see it transcribed here with a slightly different meaning. Also seeming to validate her point as a done deal.

But when you start contrasting liberal liberal liberal -- redistributionist policies with limited government policies -- the limited government conservative policies, economics win every time.
RUSSERT: Is it the economy, stupid?
CARVILLE: Of course it is,


I would like to discuss the merits of redistribution and I do not think it should be accepted as a known fact that limited government economics wins every time. After the other whoppers, these 'facts' should be met with a high degree of skepticism.

She plays a killer game of kick the can. She got in a good kick AND nobody noticed, a twofer. She will be back for more. Don't you love her enabler?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]