Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Olbermann's Special Comment on FISA

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 6:12 AM on February 1, 2008.


President Bush has put protecting the telecom giants from the laws… ahead of protecting you from the terrorists.
Olbermann Special Comment on FISA

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

I'm sure Dick Cheney's admission that telecoms handed over private communications records without a warrant to the Bush Administration had nothing at all to do with this. (H/T to C&L.):

...But the moment he says anything else, any doubt that the telecoms knowingly broke the law, is out the window, and with it, any chance that even the Republicans who are fighting this like they were trying to fend off terrorists using nothing but broken beer bottles and swear words couldn't consent to retroactively immunize corporate criminals.

Which is why the Vice President probably shouldn't have phoned in to the Rush Limbaugh Propaganda-Festival yesterday.

Sixth sentence out of Mr. Cheney's mouth: The FISA bill is about, quote, "retroactive liability protection for the companies that have worked with us and helped us prevent further attacks against the United States."

Oops. Mr. Cheney is something of a loose cannon, of course. But he kind of let the wrong cat out of the bag there.

Good one, Dick. In my business, we like to call this an "admission against interest."

The Senate agreement? Via CQ (sorry, no link), a bit of procedure is explained:

...After days of complex negotiations over a floor procedure for legislation (S 2248) rewriting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA, PL 95-511), Senate leaders reached agreement Thursday evening on which amendments to allow.

The Senate is now set to hold a debate, beginning Feb. 4 and lasting two days, on a dozen amendments that will address some of the bill's most controversial aspects.

McJoan has more, including descriptions of the amendments. cboldt lines out the vote requirements for each. Marcy parses Dick. (Hmmm...that doesn't read well.) And, for fun, Glenn has some thoughts on "bi-partisanship" and "trust us" that are quite applicable here.

It is worth saying, again, that a lot of this could have been avoided had Majority Leader Harry Reid opted to use his power under Rule 14 to use the SJC bill as the base bill -- or the House-passed RESTORE Act, which includes the good amendment provisions already. But we've run a flood under that bridge, and can't go back. The good news in all of this is that the GOP blinked, and with some serious work, we may be able to pull off some of these amendments. So let's get to work.

Let's hit the phones and FAXes. Numbers for Senators are here, including click-thrus to their web pages which include phone and fax numbers for DC and local offices. Also, ProjectVoteSmart has a great compilation of information that you can search by zipcode. Credo has a fantastic tool for contacting your representatives. EFF has a great tool as well.

You can send FAXes for free through a number of internet spots, including FreeFax, eFAX, faxzero, and any number of other places if you don't have a FAX of your own. (Do read the fine print on all of these before using them.)

Toll-free numbers for Congress from Katymine:

1 (800) 828 - 0498

1 (800) 459 - 1887

1 (800) 614 - 2803

1 (866) 340 - 9281

1 (866) 338 - 1015

1 (877) 851 - 6437

Every Senator needs a call, so please take the time to call or FAX yours today. Several Senators could use extra contact on this -- uncommitted Democrats, members of the Gang of 14, and a number of wavering Republicans. Tell them you want (1) NO telecom immunity, (2) NO basket warrants or reverse targeting -- this violates the 4th amendment, (3) sequestration of illegally harvested evidence, and (4) a 4 year sunset. That's at a minimum. It is well past time that respect for the rule of law and the role of Congress in the balance of powers was restored:

Name Phone FAX

Bayh 202) 224-5623 (202) 228-1377

Carper (202) 224-2441 (202) 228-2190

Obama (202) 224-2854 (202) 228-4260

Inouye (202) 224-3934 (202) 224-6747

Johnson (202) 224-5842 (202) 228 5765

Landrieu (202)224-5824 (202) 224-9735

McCaskill (202) 224-6154 (202) 228-6326

Mikulski (202) 224-4654 (202) 224-8858

Nelson (FL) (202) 224-5274 (202) 228-2183

Clinton (202) 224-4451 (202) 228-0282

Nelson (NE) (202) 224-6551 (202) 228-0012

Pryor (202) 224-2353 (202) 228-0908

Salazar (202) 224-5852 (202) 228-5036

Specter (202) 224-4254 (202) 228-1229

McCain (202) 224-2235 (202) 228-2862

Graham (202) 224-5972 (202) 224-3808

Warner (202) 224-2023 (202) 224-6295

Snowe (202) 224-5344 (202) 224-1946

Collins (202) 224-2523 (202) 224-2693

Sununu (202) 224-2841 (202) 228-4131

Lieberman (202) 224-4041 (202) 224-9750

Byrd (202) 224-3954 (202) 228-0002

Lincoln (202)224-4843 (202)228-1371

Chambliss (202) 224-3521 (202) 224-0103

Coleman (202) 224-5641 (202) 224-1152

Dole (202) 224-6342 (202) 224-1100

Smith (202) 224-3753 (202) 228-3997

Stabenow (202) 224-4822 (202) 228-0325

Kohl (202) 224-5653 (202) 224-9787

Feinstein (202) 224-3841 (202) 228-3954

Digg!

Tagged as: warrantless wiretapping, olbermann, cheney, fisa

Christy Hardin Smith is a former attorney, who earned her undergraduate degree at Smith College, in American Studies and Government, concentrating in American Foreign Policy. She then went on to graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania in the field of political science and international relations/security studies, before attending law school at the College of Law at West Virginia University, where she was Associate Editor of the Law Review.


Henry Rollins and Paul Waldman Spurn the Media's Love for McCain
From Friday's episode of Meet the Bloggers
Post by Robert Greenwald. September 6, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
GOP Vetting Emporium and Taco Stand
Come for the vetting, stay for the tacos!
Post by Brave New Films. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you Keith O
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Feb 1, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMHO, watching Keith O give one of his special comments is the best and most riveting TV in the entire history of TV. Beats any super bowl or American Idol or CSI show, not to mention all the other crap they pollute the airwaves with.

Except for Keith O., virtually the entire American news media sucks.

The stupid ass TV news industry spends zillions of dollars covering CRAP when the best stuff if simply a smart, brave guy sitting there telling it like it is. No, let's all run out and cover Britney Spears flashing her crotch.

Damn, that guy is good but I should stop gushing here, his ego is probably already too big! :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you Keith O Posted by: graffen48
» find this on MSNBC Posted by: Declan
Damning stuff that we already knew...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 1, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and yet wished more of the electorate paid attention to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And A Sportscaster Shall Lead Them
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 1, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amazing that with all of the 'Professional Journalists' employed by the Nets, a guy who came over from ESPN ends up being the guy with the cojones enough to stand upon the ever shrinking principle that just because the president says it does not make it true. Good for you, Mr Olbermann.

Somewhere Ed Murrow is smiling and it isn't about what Sean McManus and Katie Couric have done to destroy CBS News.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keith O.
Posted by: 2dogarage on Feb 1, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kickin' ass and taking names! Please don't ever stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President's Job
Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon on Feb 1, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, Keith. The President of the United States' job is to uphold the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic. His job is not to protect the people, but the Constitution. I guess, if the Constitution is protected, then the people are.Never before have we had an appointed king who reads the laws and the Constitution to suit himself. After watching Sicko, I want to live in France.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

According to Alternet
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 2, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith's ratings are not too high, and O'Lielly is #1. Who in the HELL is watching Faux "news" anymore? Is this true? If it is, it only proves my deepest belief-there is no underestimating the general intelligence of the American public-especially in red states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President's Job 2
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Feb 3, 2008 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the above comment, President's Job,

Positively correct. The American system is founded on the principle that the people are the only body that can be trusted to protect the people. The government has the power to regulate the infrastructure of society because the people give up some of their power to the government, but not without limit. The constitution is the law which governs the responsibilities and the limits of power of the government because, according to our nation's founding fathers, there is no greater threat to the people than their own government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]