Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dem Consultants Are Paid to Lose

Posted by Jane Hamsher, Firedoglake at 4:11 AM on December 26, 2007.


They aren't just parasites on the American political process, they're willing to spread their services around the globe.
Our Brand of Crisis Trailer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

The New York Times chose to spend Christmas reminding us of the obscene amounts Democratic consultants have been paid for their services in past Presidential campaigns. As in Bob "don't worry, John, that Swiftboat thing -- it'll all blow over" Shrum:

Behind the scenes, they were fighting over the lucrative fees for handling Mr. Kerry's television advertising. The campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, became so fed up over the squabbling that she told the consultants, led by Robert Shrum, one of the most prominent and highly paid figures in the business, to figure out how to split the money themselves.

Divvy it up they did. Though the final tally has never been publicly disclosed, interviews and records show that the five strategists and their firms ultimately took in nearly $9 million, the richest payday for any Democratic media consultants up to then and roughly what the Bush campaign paid its consultants for a more extensive ad campaign.

Mr. Shrum and his two partners, Tad Devine and Mike Donilon, walked away with $5 million of the total. And that was after Ms. Cahill, in the closing stages of the race that fall, diverted $1 million that would otherwise have gone to the consultants to buying more advertising time in what turned out to be an unsuccessful effort to defeat Mr. Bush.

Ah Tad Devine. Who went to Bolivia to help Goni get elected to the Presidency, as chronicled in the documentary "Our Brand is Crisis" (YouTube above). Who could forget the opening scenes of the film, of rioting and blood running in the streets of Bolivia, followed by Tad Devine standing on a corner wearing a sweater vest and talking into a cell phone saying shit like "This is the frame -- we can brand crisis."

No it's not a comedy, at least not intentionally so. (Though I challenge you to watch the scene of Jeremy Rosner sitting behind a two-way mirror typing frantically on his computer as they test messaging on a focus group of Bolivian farmers and not howl with laughter. It's like something from a Christopher Guest movie.)

In the YouTube above, Rosner talks briefly about why he is in Bolivia, and his deeply felt conviction that Goni has the best program for raising Bolivia out of poverty. They managed to get him elected all right, by the slimmest of pluralities, but Goni tried to implement "Shock Doctrine" policies and was forced to resign shortly thereafter:

Goni, who was president from 1991-97 and from 2002-03, was forced out of office by the people of Bolivia for his violations of both human rights and democratic principles.

During his reign, Goni pushed neoliberal, export-oriented economic reforms onto the very poor and largely unwilling population of Bolivia. He privatized many of Bolivia's state-owned enterprises, including the country's national oil company which resulted in losses of $40 million/year in government revenues. He proposed tax increases on the working poor. He tried to further privatize Bolivia's oil and gas sector, which would have led to the resources being sold back to the Bolivian people at much higher rates. Overall, his privatization policies led to higher unemployment, an increase in poverty levels, decreased national income, and a greater economic dependency on international institutions.

Goni's disastrous economic policies led to may civil protests throughout the country. These protests were often met with military force.

* In Feb. 2003, police in La Paz went on strike partly in protest of the proposed tax increases, and the ensuing gun battle with the government troops, followed by civil protests, left 34 Bolivians dead.

* In Oct. 2003, the "Gas War" began in El Alto. Citizens protesting Goni's plan to further privatize gas and oil were fired on by government troops trying to break apart their blockade of La Paz. Twenty-eight people were killed, and during the protests that followed in El Alto and La Paz, the military killed another 39 people.

Goni was forced out of office due to the massive protests he faced after the October massacre. He and two of his ministers fled to the U.S., where they have been living ever since. The Bolivian people have demanded that Goni and his cabinet ministers, who are responsible for these murders, be returned to their country to face the "Trial of Responsibility" that the Bolivian Congress authorized in 2004.

The Bolivian Supreme Court indicted Goni in February of this year. Goni lives in the United States, where he has been protected from extradition by the Bushies. Six law firms and human rights groups, however, recently filed suits in Maryland, demanding compensation for the families of those killed in the protest.

Anyway, I just wanted to make the point that these "Democratic consultants" aren't just parasites on the American political process, they're willing to spread their services around the globe. With predictably disastrous results.

For the right price, of course.

Digg!

Tagged as: democratic party, carville, shrum, kerry, bolivia

Jane Hamsher is the founder of FireDogLake. Her work has also appeared on the Huffington Post, Alternet and The American Prospect.


Check out Michael Moore's Newest Documentary for Free!
Watch the trailer for "Slacker Uprising" and sign up for the download.
Post by Robert Greenwald. September 4, 2008.
Black Republican Gets Enraged Over Katrina at RNC
Founder of HipHopRepublicans becomes violent with Cenk.
Post by Cenk Uygur. September 4, 2008.
Jon Stewart Thrashes Rove, O'Reilly For Palin Hypocrisy
How do you spell 'double standard?'
Post by Staff. September 4, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Election time: "Meet the new boss..."
Posted by: Dianka on Dec 26, 2007 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be good to hear these things discussed in the public forum, on TV, in the mainstream newspapers. I remain stunned by the number of Americans who just don't get it, who already have the champagne on ice in anticipation of the next election, believing with childlike faith that the new Democratic administration will restore truth, justice and the American way. In spite of what their own eyes see, they don't recognize that the New Dems are merely a parody of the far-right Repubs. Different hat, same party. With his cool sax music, Bill Clinton took an ax to the New Deal policies that made this nation one of hope and opportunity. Hillary Clinton markets war and oppression with a feminine touch. Based on modern (the last half century) history, there is no logical reason to assume that the upcoming Dem administration will end the war; war has been quite profitable for the party. Expect universal health care? Don't hold your breath. Hope for reforming our prison system, which makes the old Soviet gulag look puny in comparison? That won't happen as long as it, like workfare, is a highly profitable source of super-cheap labor for the corporations that pay for our political system. Without a people's party, we aren't going to see America become what we know it could be, and should be. So, as the old song goes, "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...We (will) be fooled again!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no new boss
Posted by: Rune on Dec 26, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republican and Republican-lite (a.k.a. Democrats) wings of the ruling party continue to serve their corporate/banking overlords. Nothing has changed. Nothing will change so long as most of the people continue to pretend that there is an elected government by, for, and of the people instead of scoffing at such absurdities and running and voting for candidates that really do represent them.

All votes for Republicans or Republican-lites are endorsements of the corrupt status quo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Dem Party .....
Posted by: bobtr900 on Dec 26, 2007 1:13 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...ought to drop all it's political strtegists and just go back to original democractic party values. That is if they even remember what those were. Political strategists are killingthe Democractic Party nd the sooner the Dmes understand that fact they will once again become the party of 'we the people'and win elections. Until then they are running on an almost nearly empty tank.

Do they aver wake up? Methinks NOT. Any future political victories will be short lived. Maybe they are all afraid of being excommunicated from the Church, my church,that si alraedy way far from the techings of the real Jesus Christ and serving only the interests of the institutional church, the traditional church and NOT the teachings of Jesus.

George Bush may claim to be Jesus but I know better. Apparently the Pope does not.

God knows...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Left vs. Liberal
Posted by: JMTulip on Dec 27, 2007 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above is worth watching for those unfortunate American souls who have convinced themselves that the term Left and Liberal are one and the same. They're not. They never will be.

The above is Liberalism. Those are Liberals doing what they do -- advising and willingly sacrificing human rights and human freedoms for "free markets."

America has not left wing party. The Democrats are Liberals, the Republicans are Liberal-conservatives. As long as that remains the fact, as long as even mild mannered social democracy is an alien concept to American political culture, the dire and present state of affairs will continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accessibility, please
Posted by: audiodef on Dec 30, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Captions or transcripts. I'm through being nice. Provide one or the other. You have plenty of readers with varying levels of hearing impairments. Get. With. The. Program.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]