Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

9/11 Commission Chair: "No Question" CIA Attempted "to Impede Our Investigation"

Posted by Faiz Shakir, Think Progress at 6:11 AM on December 25, 2007.


Tom Kean says, "I mean, no question that we again and again and again asked for everything, and we needed it, and we weren't given it."
9/11 Commission Chairman: ‘No Question’ CIA Attempted ‘To Impede Our Investigation’

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

In its attempts to uncover all materials related to the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 Commission specifically requested material about the interrogations of Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. The New York Times has revealed that the CIA destroyed tapes of the two men's interrogation without informing the 9/11 Commission about their existence.

On Saturday, former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin told CNN:

,I think it's ludicrous to suggest, in fact, that we withheld anything of consequence from the 9/11 Commission. Anything that was on the tapes that would be relevant to their inquiry was given to them in writing, and the tapes would have simply not advanced their inquiry at all.

In fact, the tapes were highly relevant to the Commission's inquiry. Philip Zelikow -- the former staff director of the 9/11 Commission -- explained: "The Commission was not investigating the treatment of captives. But it did seek information not only about the 9/11 plot, but also any intelligence information about the history and evolution of al Qaeda and its connections to other terrorist entities. Therefore, from the start, the Commission sought to obtain all relevant information gleaned from the interrogation of captives."

This morning on CNN, 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean there is "no question" the CIA was aware that its now-destroyed videotapes depicting severe interrogations were among evidence being sought by 9/11 Commission investigators, and the destruction of the tapes was an attempt to "impede our investigation":

We asked for every single thing that they had. And then my vice chairman, Lee Hamilton, looked the director of the CIA in the face, and said, Look, even if we haven't asked for something, if it's pertinent to our investigation, make it available to us. And our staff asked again and again of their staff and the tapes were not given to us. So, there was no question.[...]

I mean, no question that we again and again and again asked for everything, and we needed it, and we weren't given it. And so, the only conclusion we can draw is it was withheld from us. And that can only be seen to me as an attempt to impede our investigation.

CIA spokesman Mike Mansfield said recently that the tapes weren't destroyed until 2005 "because it was thought the commission could ask about the tapes at some point." So, the CIA withheld the tapes and destroyed the evidence later, ensuring no one could view them to determine whether they were relevant to the Commission's inquiry.

Digg!

Tagged as: 9/11, cia, 9/11 commission, kean

Faiz Shakir is the Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Editor of ThinkProgress.org and The Progress Report.


Religulous: Finally, a Movie for Atheists Like Me
Bill Maher questions religion's inherent contradictions in a new documentary.
Post by DJK. October 11, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.
Donna Brazile: "I'm Not Going to the Back of the Bus!"
An impassioned speech on racial politics from last week's New Yorker festival.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
911 truth
Posted by: ronheri on Dec 25, 2007 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The majority of Americans want a new 911 investigation. This wont happen on the Bush/Cheney watch; they reluctenly agreed to testifying to the first one and then only after a year passed, and only if they could be there together and not under oath. See any "red flags there? The coverup continues to this day. Where are our Congress men, our judicial system and where is our so called free press? This crime needs a new, truthful, and complete investigation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coverup on coverup on coverup.
Posted by: weslen1 on Dec 25, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"On Saturday, former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin told CNN:

,I think it's ludicrous to suggest, in fact, that we withheld anything of consequence from the 9/11 Commission. Anything that was on the tapes that would be relevant to their inquiry was given to them in writing, and the tapes would have simply not advanced their inquiry at all."

Of course this idiot would say this. They're all covering for their prez and vice prez and as far as the 9/11 commission, they should have gone much farther in questioning why ANY of the evidence was removed from the site before a proper investigation could be finished. And also why the rubble was used to fill pot holes. That is rubble that contained unrecovered body parts. Guiliani personally gave that order. A real investigation would have interfered too much with his sex life AND no one has, to this day, got an honest answer about how he knew the buildings would fall and who told him. Here is a direct quote, "We were told the buildings were going to fall. And they did, indeed, fall, before we were able to get out. So we were trapped in the building for 10 or 15 minutes before we finally found an exit." It's on tape. Every news program across the country should be playing those words over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gandalf82
Posted by: GANDALF84 on Dec 25, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just ask, why did building #7 fall? It was not hit by an airplane or anything else. It was a planned demolition. The same was true of buildings 1 and 2. Follow the money. The buildings were obsolete and losing money and provided the excuse needed to steal away our hard earned freedoms. Why are we not in the streets screaming?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gandalf82 Posted by: 2dogarage
» Yep...... Posted by: pig
» RE: Yep...... Posted by: 2dogarage
The 9/11 Cover-up Commission blames the CIA for not giving them the tapes, hmmm
Posted by: LeftWright on Dec 25, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who will they blame for the Commissions failure to report:

1) That they knew the NORAD officials, including Gen. Richard Myers, were lying to them during their testimony before the Commission;

2) That they excluded any mention of WTC 7 from their report. WTC 7 being the $850 million, 47-story steel-framed building that fell in 6.6 seconds at 5:20pm on 9/11/01 that was not hit by a plane and whose destruction still has not been explained by any government body;

3) on Norman Mineta's testimony, before their very Commission and live on CSPN, that clearly implicates V.P. Cheney in some treasonous behavior;

4) on FBI translator Sibel Edmonds 3 1/2 hours of closed door testimony which she has said connected very well known Americans to the 9/11 operation;

5) on William Rodriguez's 2 1/2 hours of closed door testimony in which he describes massive explosions going off in the sub-basement of the North Tower before the first plane hit;

6) on the numerous military war games and governmental exercises that were going on 9/11/01, many of which were designed to simulate the events that actually occurred, such as hijacked planes being flown into buildings;

7) on Mayor Giuliani's statement to Peter Jennings on live tv that he was warned that the Towers were about to collapse when no one else had any idea that this unprecedented event would occur;

8) that the U.S. Secret Service completely disregarded all standard operating procedures while "protecting" Pres. Bush in the Florida classroom;

9) that Mohammed Atta and many other of the alleged "hijackers" received training on U.S. military bases and were allowed to fly in and out of the U.S. many times leading up to 9/11/01, even though they were on so-called "terrorist watch lists";

10) that the FBI admits that they have "no hard evidence linking bin Laden to the events of 9/11";

11) that the FBI secured and cleared the three main crime scenes (NYC, Pentagon and Shanksville, PA) before doing any kind of proper forensic investigation;

12) the fact that they allowed themselves to be spoon fed information by Philip D. Zelikow, an obvious Bush Administration insider.

It is way past time that the American people threw away the 9/11 Commission Report and called for a truly independent and completely open investigation into the events of 9/11/01.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you REALLY want to see who/what we are up against ...
Posted by: TarryFaster on Dec 25, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then click on this link to get an overview ---> CLICK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA Attempted to impede September 11 Investigation
Posted by: c_alfred on Dec 25, 2007 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a retired US Army First Sergeant with almost 27 years of service to the American people and [I thought] to this country. I unfortunately have several undergrad and graduate degrees. The person who first uttered the phrase, "Ignorance is Bliss" deserves a ringing accolade indeed. I spent time inc countries all over the world...countries where people are willing to risk their lives, people who are willing to die. Why? For the right to vote. Or for the right to fair labor laws. My family had to flee from Italy because Mussolini's Brown Shirts were systematically murdering and bludgeoning those who stood up and spoke against the Fascists. Part of my family came to this country. I was the first child born here. I've never forgotten about losing my mother land, but pledged allegiance to this land. Now the fuckers are here all over again...and the American people are fat dumb and happy, and asleep at the switch. After that meat grinder of VietNam that screwed up my entire life, I keep asking myself the same question over and over again, especially after September 11: "Where is the Rage?" How can I deal with a populace that has no questioning ability, no curiosity, that has no shame? How do you stir up a nation that is perpetually ready for bed? Where is the justice? Where is the retribution? Where is the Outrage? What's the telephone number of the Angel who descends to smite these scum bags with his Fiery Sword? Who can speak the reassuring tranquilizing words in my ear: "Hear me, your friends who died in the Vietnamese countryside, the blood you bled and the blood you shed, those you killed...were not for Union Carbide and Dow Chemical and General Electric. All of you young people fought and died for a higher, and worthy cause, and it will be explained to you when we meet."
But I do not believe, not for a moment. I will turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to any further lies and propaganda.

C.A.S. 1SG
Infanty, USA-R

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't believe a word coming from either camp
Posted by: neilemac on Dec 26, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Divide and conquer is their motto, take on an issue to keep the people fighting among themselves while the real dirty work is done and expunged behind the back of public scrutiny. Play out the game in the media while in the government arena [Congress] the corporatist representatives from both parties feign fights with each other in order to gain the sympathies of opposing sides on the issue and further divide the people. Same old same old. There's only one party, the "Property" party says Gore Vidal. And I believe him before any voice coming out of the government.

"We only have one political party in the U.S., and that is the property party, which essentially is corporate America, which has two right wings, ..."

Wake up 'we the people!' do not continue to be baaa, baaa, baaa 'sheeple' corralled by pseudo patriotic rhetoric.

True democracy can only exist if citizens participate in the debate and outcome of decisions. Find out why the Electoral College is a colossal miscarriage of 'we the people.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"ANTHING OF ANY CONSEQUENCE"??
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 26, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What did they withhold and who decided it was inconsequential? This is the typical White House order of things. Lie until you're caught and then explain to us why it wasn't lying in the first place. If we weren't so stupid we'd know. "Decisions" are made by those who know what's best for us, which turns out to be whatever they choose to tell us. I can't think of one thing that this administration has been upfront and honest about. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another perspective-
Posted by: LisaPeters on Dec 26, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ira Winkler makes a good point
here when he explains why the CIA had to destroy the tapes.


And why, in the end, it's empirically the best thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another perspective-
Posted by: LisaPeters on Dec 26, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ira Winkler makes a good point
here when he explains why the CIA had to destroy the tapes.


And why, in the end, it's empirically the best thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accessibility, please
Posted by: audiodef on Dec 30, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Captions or transcripts. I'm through being nice. Provide one or the other. You have plenty of readers with varying levels of hearing impairments. Get. With. The. Program.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]