Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fox News Attacks: Edwards and Obama [VIDEO]

Posted by Cliff Schecter, Brave New Films at 11:42 AM on December 19, 2007.


Why would it make sense for John Edwards and Barack Obama to go on a network that has spread false rumors about both ad nauseam?
Fox News Attacks: Edwards and Obama

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Recently, Chris Wallace, a man who traded in a career in journalism for the more profitable world of propaganda, deigned to lecture Democratic presidential candidates on how they were just destroying their campaigns by not going on Fox.

"I think the Democrats are damn fools [for] not coming on Fox News," Wallace said. "And my guess is that once you get a nominee, they probably will come on, because they know that we get a lot of voters they are going to need if they are going to win the election."
Apparently, in between segments on bare bouncing breasts and Sean Hannity's defending white supremacists, it would make sense for John Edwards and Barack Obama to go on a network that has spread false rumors about both ad nauseam.

Now I enjoy going on Fox now and again myself, because beating up on hapless Republicans, whether on Fox or other cable channels, is such an absolutely cathartic experience. But to teach the obviously cerebrally challenged Mr. Wallace about how politics works, well Chris, you win by getting the most votes (or having your party control the Supreme Court).

So why would Democratic pols go on a station that continually demonizes them and their politics, and furthermore, where a relatively recent survey shows that the viewers voted for George W. Bush over John Kerry by 88% to 7% (the other 5% wrote in Pinochet I'm guessing)?

As former Fox reporter/anchor Jon Du Pre put it in the documentary "Outfoxed," "We weren't necessarily, as it was told to us, a newsgathering organization so much as we were a proponent of a point of view ... we were there to reinforce a constituency."
Maybe Chris can explain that to us someday, in between reminding his viewers that WMD were indeed found in Iraq and George W. Bush is just Churchill with a better package in a flight suit...

Digg!

Tagged as: o'reilly, obama, fox news, edwards, wallace

Cliff Schecter blogs at Brave New Films.


How Goldman Secretly Bet on the U.S. Housing Crash
Only later did investors in $40 billion in securities discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Post by Staff. December 25, 2009.
Video: New Ad Takes Obama to Task for Ditching Public Option
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee is hitting the president hard -- with his own words -- for backing a health-care bill with a mandate and no public option.
Post by AlterNet Staff. December 23, 2009.
Are Hewlett Packard Computers Racist?
There's something wrong with HP's webcam face recognition software. Specifically, it doesn't see black people.
Post by Staff. December 21, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?