Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Danny Glover on Poverty in America and Why He's Endorsed John Edwards [VIDEO]

Posted by Adam Howard, AlterNet at 7:01 PM on December 8, 2007.


The activist movie star talks with Tavis Smiley about his concern for America's poor and why he thinks John Edwards is the best presidential candidate to address their needs.
Danny Glover on Poverty in America, Why He Endorses John Edwards

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Oprah may be more high profile, but actor Danny Glover has more progressive activist credentials, and it turns out he's throwing his considerable charisma behind the candidacy of John Edwards in the 2008 election. On The Tavis Smiley Show, Glover says, "we see the manifestations of New Orleans in every single major city in this country and nobody is talking about that." While he sees the appeal for historic reasons for nominating Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, he believes Edwards has been more substantive. Check out the video to your right for more.

Digg!

Tagged as: glover, edwards, election08, poverty

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Benjamin Carter v. Hallibuton Company and KBR
Taking Iraq's war profiteers to court.
Post by Brave New Films. July 25, 2008.
Washington Warmongering Monsters!
A fake horror movie trailer spoofing the current administration.
Post by Brave New Films. July 25, 2008.
Bill Moyers Takes Us to the Heart of the Mortgage Meltdown
Moyers Journal travels to ground zero of the mortgage crisis - Cleveland, Ohio.
Post by Bill Moyers and Rick Karr. July 25, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
perceptive
Posted by: okhela on Dec 10, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perceptive analysis by an activist with credentials. If my choice, Dennis Kucinich(sp), must bow out of the campaign, Edwards would be my second choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally!
Posted by: 2dogarage on Dec 10, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally a little positive press about a candidate who is running his own campaign without big-money endorsements. John Edwards is by far the best choice for Pres., just check out his speeches on his website. I just worry that since he isn't in anyone's pocket that the power machine that runs our government will run him over should he be elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hits the nail on the head
Posted by: outlander55 on Dec 10, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards is the ONLY candidate that has put the peoples concerns before the corporations. An Edwards/ Kucinich ticket would turn America around 360 degrees from the corporate fascism that we face today. Only Edwards had the balls to say that he would challenge Congress to form a universal health care plan in 6 months or he would strip Congress of its' health care benefits that we, the taxpayers pay for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

voter responsibility
Posted by: Doubtom on Dec 10, 2007 7:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't question Glover's credentials, he's genuine enough but I do question the contention of one here, who refers to Edwards as the only one who has gone after the corporations. If Kucinich hasn't led that fight, I don't know who has, or from what source you get your news.

Why, on the basis of one man's opinion, would anyone take a fall-back position on Kucinich. If Kucinich is your choice, say so by voting for him, don't make him second best on the basis of celebrity opinion.
If he displays the characteristics you deem desirable in a president, you owe him your vote, or else the whole procedure becomes farcical as we sink further into the cult of personality.
I genuinely admire Glover and Edwards but in stacking positions on all issues, I find only Kucinich to be worthy of my vote. Of course, I'll be in the minority, as I was in voting for Nader but my vote will represent my judgement and not that of anyone else.
I do feel that if more people voted their convictions instead of responding to the major parties and their lies about no one but their choice having a chance to win, we'd have a better representation of the actual popularity of candidates like Kucinich and Nader.
Celebrity is fine, although I feel it is all too easily conferred in this country, but it should never substitute for the responsibility of the individual citizen to think and act for himself. That is the essence of self-governance and without it, we are in fact, no better than sheep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: voter responsibility Posted by: Basenjis
Good to see positive message!
Posted by: rockforhunger on Dec 11, 2007 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is great to see so many celebs giving a positive message, and helping motivate others to take action against poverty!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]