Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bill O'Reilly Runs Ads for the Same Anti-War Movie He Claims "Hurts Our Troops"

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 7:08 AM on November 20, 2007.


Matt Corley: Mark Cuban says the point of the ad buy was to see what O'Reilly's real motivation for attacking the film was.
Bill O'Reilly vs. Redacted

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Matt Corley, originally appeared on Think Progress

For two months now, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly has been using his various media perches to criticize and attack Brian De Palma's controversial new film, Redacted, which was financed by Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. The film centers around a fictionalized portrayal of "the true story of a group of U.S. soldiers who raped and killed a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and murdered members of her family."

O'Reilly kicked off his campaign against the film with a column in September, saying the filmmakers "should be ashamed" because "they are hurting their own country." He sharpened his attacks last week, calling for a boycott of the "vile," "anti-American" film during multiple segments on his show. In a second column, O'Reilly compared Cuban and DePalma to Charles Manson:

There is no excuse for "Redacted." The incident is based on a true story, but those who committed the crimes are in prison for life. You don't celebrate this kind of aberration with a movie-you don't brand the U.S. military with this stigma.
Charles Manson is an American too, but does he represent this country in any way? Of course not. And I believe even the odious Manson would not make a movie like "Redacted."
Cuban hasresponded to O'Reilly's criticism by claiming that the Fox News star is mischaracterizing the film and attacking it without having seen it. Last week, in order to test "O'Reilly's motivation" for his campaign, Cuban bought ad time for the film during The O'Reilly Factor. The ad ran during the Nov. 15 edition of the show.

Watch a compilation of O'Reilly's attacks on Cuban and the ad he aired to your right.

According to Cuban, the point of the ad buy was to see if the issue "really was important to Mr. O'Reilly, or whether" he "would say whatever he needed to say to get more people to watch." Cuban said he had no problem whatsoever obtaining the time:
I had someone call FoxNews and tell them specifically, unequivocally that we wanted to run an ad for the movie Redacted. The same movie Bill OReilly was so upset about.

They said no problem. Do you want to run the ads in both the live show and the repeat?
Our first reaction was that this was just the sales department and at some point , someone at FoxNews would step in and stop the ads from running. The call to say they were stopping the ads never came.
The ad ran in both shows. Here is a link with Bill's smiling face at the end.
O'Reilly has yet to comment on the fact that his show is now profiting off the promotion of a film he claims is "hurting our troops and helping the terrorists."

Digg!

Tagged as: o'reilly, film, fox news, mark cuban, redacted

Matt Corley is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


How Goldman Secretly Bet on the U.S. Housing Crash
Only later did investors in $40 billion in securities discover that what Goldman had promoted as triple-A rated investments were closer to junk.
Post by Staff. December 25, 2009.
Video: New Ad Takes Obama to Task for Ditching Public Option
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee is hitting the president hard -- with his own words -- for backing a health-care bill with a mandate and no public option.
Post by AlterNet Staff. December 23, 2009.
Are Hewlett Packard Computers Racist?
There's something wrong with HP's webcam face recognition software. Specifically, it doesn't see black people.
Post by Staff. December 21, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?