Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Employment Non-Discrimination Act Passes House Without Gender Protections

Posted by Melissa McEwan, Shakesville at 6:00 AM on November 8, 2007.


Melissa McEwan: I don't know what else to say at the moment, except that I'll continue to be a fierce ally for the Transgendered.
Barney Frank on ENDA

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Melissa McEwan, originally appeared on Shakesville

Video and info here.

Immediately, I got an email from HRC celebrating, but noting in bold letters:

"HRC remains 100% committed to doing the hard work necessary to pass legislation that protects our entire community, including transgender workers who remain especially vulnerable to workplace discrimination."

Especially vulnerable. Indeed. Perhaps more so than anyone realized, given the extent of the prejudice expressed by presumed allies during the run-up to this vote.

As Pam said yesterday morning:

"[T]he big picture is that this entire situation is a complete embarrassing mess of mixed messages and motives, inadequate preparation, poor PR strategy, and a hell of a lot of anger and vitriol that is damaging, painful and was this amateur hour was avoidable.

One can only hope that whatever tattered relationships remain can be stitched together in some form or fashion, because there's more legislation and lobbying coming down the pike. Our community, for whatever that word means at this moment, needs to find a better way of doing things."

I don't know what else to say at the moment, except that I'll continue to be a fierce ally for the Ts.

Digg!

Tagged as: transgender, homosexuality, discrimination, labor, enda

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Henry Rollins and Paul Waldman Spurn the Media's Love for McCain
From Friday's episode of Meet the Bloggers
Post by Robert Greenwald. September 6, 2008.
Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
GOP Vetting Emporium and Taco Stand
Come for the vetting, stay for the tacos!
Post by Brave New Films. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My ignorance
Posted by: Axiom69 on Nov 8, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can someone answer this? Is there a "legal" definition of transgendered? If so, is it based on what sex one "feels" they are or is it based on whether or not they have the chromosones of one sex but the genitalia of the other?
I think there is alot of confusion in the hetero community on the difference between homosexual, transexual, transgendered and transvestite. This confusion/ignorance probably leads to delays in legislation for civil protections. Ignorance is no excuse but I'm sure it has something to do with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The lexicon is fascinating. nm Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Definitions are convienent Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: My ignorance Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: My ignorance Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» Very well said! Posted by: ~Fiona~
» Nicely stated Posted by: Tombo
» RE: My ignorance Posted by: Guy Montag
Just a question...
Posted by: Q30 on Nov 8, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does the author feel about the male-to-female transgendered people who've been disallowed participation in all-female sporting events?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just a question... Posted by: PirateJesus
We don't need a federal law for cross-dressing
Posted by: freeda'all on Nov 9, 2007 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So fiona thinks we need a federal law so that her husband will 'be allowed' to wear dresses to work?

The fallacy of this argument is that in the first place there is nothing other than social convention or workplace requirements that goes against him doing so. He is free to wear a dress anywhere he wants. He's also free to wear his (or his wife's) underwear on his head. There are already laws against assaulting, harrassing or stalking people so there doesn't need to be one specific to cover cross-dressers.

Also, transvestites are gay men, cross-dressers are straight men. Let's keep the terminology clear here and stop conflating real issues with the fluff of seeking "protection" for fetishism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]