Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fox Attacks Decency With Bill O'Reilly Leading the Way [VIDEO]

Posted by Cliff Schecter, Fox Attacks at 5:02 AM on November 8, 2007.


I don't recall seeing any soft porn on my console TV growing up when my parents watched the Huntley-Brinkley report or later during the MacNeil-Lehrer Hour.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Cliff Schecter, originally appeared on Fox Attacks

Most of you are aware, and most likely have been for a while, that under the guise of "news" Fox has offered its viewers a steady stream of bias pertaining to social and political issues since its inception in 1996. From attacking Black America to pushing for war with Iran, from demonizing bloggers to distorting environmental issues, theirs is quite a record of achievement in propagating propaganda that is neither fair nor balanced.

Today we have a surprise (well at least it surprised all of us at BNF). Thanks to the terrific work of the News Hounds, we bring you Fox and ole' Billy O'Reilly attacking decency. Yes, you read that right. The self-righteous, pompous, bloviators who deign to lecture on how we should behave in our personal lives, are in fact exploiting women, pandering to the lowest common denominator and pushing smut out on the airwaves on a daily basis!

And this will definitely raise your hackles. YOU ARE PAYING FOR THIS! Yes, you read that right too. So watch the video and pass it along to as many on your email list as possible. We simply must let the FCC know we are mad as hell about having their smut in our homes and being forced to pay for it. And we're simply not going to take it anymore.

Here's more from ChrisH at the News Hounds:

Bill O'Reilly is sort of FOX's preacher, or the father figure who scolds and punishes the wayward, appealing to the viewers who yearn for the "Father Knows Best" days of yore when minorities knew their place, women stayed home in servitude, kids were seen and not heard, and a man's home was his castle. Yes, those were the days - if you weren't a minority, a woman, or a kid. Hence O'Reilly's popularity among older white males who blame their lost stature on teevee even as they're glued to it.

O'Reilly has a habit of lecturing about the decline of moral values, although he phrases it in the context of his book "Culture Warrior" and targets the "secular progressive" faction of society, who are allegedly out to abolish "traditional values." He routinely blasts Hollywood, television, the Internet, and the music industry for producing and selling media he considers harmful to the nation's moral fabric, scrupulously avoiding his owner's part in all these productions. (FOX Television retains high honors year after year for unsuitable programming, according to Brent Bozell's Family Television Council.)

He even asserted in "The State of the Union According to the Folks" that " Sixty-three percent believe the moral and ethical climate in America is declining. And it is. The Internet and an irresponsible media have hit traditional values hard."

Like the O'Reilly Factor?

O'Reilly has recently addressed such important topics as PETA using nude female images in ads promoting a healthy vegetarian diet, "Girls Gone Wild" participants suing the producer after the fact, and dating websites that only allow "hot" people to sign up - all so he could show related videos of scantily clad young women to the dirty old men who watch. Under the guise of reporting on Internet porn sites who publish pictures of the youngest girls allowed (18), the moral decadence exhibited at beaches during Spring break, and American Idol stars who take it all off for magazines, O'Reilly played videos and showed screenshots in the interest of letting his audience see what he's talking about, raising their, um, outrage.

I don't recall seeing any soft porn on my console TV growing up when my parents watched the Huntley-Brinkley report or later during the MacNeil-Lehrer Hour.

Now O'Reilly is far from alone in featuring soft porn during alleged "news" reports. Neil Cavuto is notorious for his Hooters' girls interviews and dropping chyrons to more amply exhibit the cleavage of his guests. John Gibson has been known to do the gratuitous story or two on Playboy bunnies and sexy Internet triplets campaigning for Mitt Romney, and the Anna Nicole Smith story came complete, day after day, with video segments of her physical assets. And it seemed no one could resist the Paris Hilton burger commercial as we followed her every move to prison, home again, back to prison, and finally, apparently, off the face of the earth.

Even prudish Hannity can't resist the sexy teachers stories, and he uses the opportunities to moralize about standards and expectations - why shouldn't teachers have a morals clause in their contracts, like he does? Not one to be outdone, O'Reilly even went so far, last night 11/5/07, as to suggest that teachers should be subjected to annual polygraph tests to assure that they are not fooling around with underage students or using drugs.

But O'Reilly is the king of hypocrisy so it's not surprising that he moralizes against the decline of decency while simultaneously promoting it. He intones that we won't see anything that we couldn't see at the beach - if your beach has stripper poles, flashers, erotic dancers, and Playboy bunnies. He excuses it saying he has to show folks what he's talking about, but that's nonsense - do we need to see corpses when we hear of car accidents, or flag-draped coffins when we speak of Iraq? Oh, scratch that - he doesn't speak of the "carnage du jour" in Iraq.

FOX puts the 'tit' in titillation and the ass, well that's usually in front of the camera.

Click here for a small sampling of FOX "news"worthy imagery.

Digg!

Tagged as: sex, o'reilly, fox news, brave new films, cavuto, mediaculture, indecency

Cliff Schecter blogs at Brave New Films.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fox lives up to its name.
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Nov 8, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember back in the day, when sexy young women were called "Foxes"? ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Undisturbed
Posted by: heinz57 on Nov 8, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly do not believe in censorship but do believe in self censorship. Fox is tabloid TV applealing to a certain class of people. It is not a public service and should be placed in a "pay as you watch" catagory. This network is NOT of the public interest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Undisturbed Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
Murdock knows what sells
Posted by: Forrest on Nov 8, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Murdock knows what sells!

sex and sports!

and while he has your attention (and money)
he will tell you what and how to think.

The Romans called it "bread and circus".

What shall we call this?

sex, sports, and lets invade Israel's enemies?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Murdock knows what sells Posted by: thekidde
Fox Noise is always perverted
Posted by: leland61 on Nov 8, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you expect from a bunch of dunderheads all, and I mean all, of whom have the attention span of a gnat, the brain capacity of a flea and the morals of rats. OOOOPS.

I'm sorry, rats of the world, I did not mean to insult you. There is in fact nothing in the world with worse moral values than FOX Noise, its owner, producers, directors etc. OK - maybe the rulers of Communist China or the pseudo-kings of various and sundry Arab kingdoms - none of which shall I name because it can get you killed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks! I remember why I never watch Fox News
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Nov 8, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven't watched any Fox news in a long time. This was just a reminder why I turned it off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Television is a drug
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Nov 8, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox and its type of programming is why I got rid of my TV. I realized mind control comes in many forms. That screen in the living room is one form. It is their for a purpose. To control the person watching. Thought control in thought, word and deed.

That screen can take a peaceful nation to war against a much weaker, non aggressive nation. It will lie and manipulate a millions times over, But people love their televisions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Television is a drug Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
Its not Huntley-Brinkley MacNeil-Lehrer
Posted by: heyhick on Nov 8, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its crappy entertainment. Too bad we are paying for it, I guess. Remove the T n A and there'd be absolutely no value. So we pay, get some value from the TnA. Will it go away (the ideological news, that is)?. Perhaps the campaign here should push for equal time for the G and L set instead of the outright removal of the T n A. That would bring down the hypocrisy factor.....Isn't the dim and righteous anchor's show called the factor? How about truth in advertising...the hypocrisy factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hard to get worked up
Posted by: goeswithness on Nov 8, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see all these things on the Girls Gone Wild advertisements and MTV Spring Break and maybe I'm just jaded, but I'm having a hard time understanding why this is worse. Aren't these same images coming from those other places always defended as free expression, and No Big Deal? Yes, I do realize that the element of hypocrisy here, but I find all justifications of it kind of flimsy, and it causes me more of a smile than outrage. As far as problems with Fox news goes, this seems to me rather minor.

I have never been one to protest sexual images in other places and I don't think I will now, although I think it would be perfectly appropriate for those who want to to contact Fox news and complain directly (and you should probably also contact Comedy Central and MTV and VH1 and all the other stations while you're at it). I'm not convinced it's to my advantage to have cable broken up channel by channel either - it might be, but I want to see more evidence of that, and if I ever campaign for it, it won't be on the basis of morally objecting to the content of certain channels. That's the kind of thing progressives are far more likely to lose out on than conservatives.

Is it really about the T and A, or is it just a way to get at Fox news? I'm just concerned about the consistency of our position here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hard to get worked up Posted by: momly
HEY BILL O'
Posted by: donl51 on Nov 8, 2007 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you were growing up you don't remember seeing any soft core ,because you moron,the best we could get on tv,back then was walt disney,the mickey mouse club,i love lucy,sally star and a few others i don't feel like writting,the two pc. bathing suit wasn't out yet......then came Brigette Bardot, and I being a well balanced young man ..''liked it'' I suppose it troubled your sensibilities right? you're such a liar ,I can see right through you !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HEY BILL O' Posted by: Bozwell
Write The FCC..file complaints..against Republican pronography..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Nov 8, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News is only an extension of the perversion and vial proclivities and hypocrisy and heresy and blasphemy of the Republican Fascist Party..!

What else would you expect from these swine..like Ailes and Murdoch..?


Murdoch is a pornographer O'Reilly and Cavuto's shows are full of T&A..so they are as well..!


Write the FCC at FCCINFO@fcc.gov


They'll love hearing from you...


Tell them TJ Colatrella sent you...


LOL...!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

*shakes head*
Posted by: BazookaTooth on Nov 9, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rupert Murdoch, O'Lielly, etc. frequently remind me of a movie I'd otherwise have forgotten--the adaptation of "Dragnet," with Dan Ackroyd and Tom Hanks.

The villain is a televangelist who speaks out against the decadence of pornography--and is secretly a big-time pornographer as well. (And the leader of a huge criminal ring!)

Watch it, and you'll see what I mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Guilty pleasure
Posted by: lotus23 on Nov 9, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bit like the narcotics police officers who conduct a raid, make their arrests, then smoke the dope they just confiscated.

The question is, are the conservative FOX viewers wanking while they're watching in contrived indignation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 9, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thats the only reason to watch Faux as far as I'm concerned. With the sound off, of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]