Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Valerie Plame on "60 Minutes": "The President Is Not a Man Of His Word" [VIDEO]

Posted by Logan Murphy at 5:59 AM on October 22, 2007.


To the end, the Wilsons held strong to the truth and never backed down, even when the CIA made it difficult for her to publish her own book on the events, Fair Game, eventually redacting 10% of it.
Valerie Plame on 60 Minutes

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Logan Murphy, originally appeared on Crooks and Liars

Outed CIA covert operative Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband, Joe Wilson, gave an interview to Katie Couric on 60 Minutes. In the first segment, Plame Wilson spoke frankly about being betrayed by this administration, as well as her assessment of the damage done to the nation's security by revealing her identity.

But the second segment is where Couric goes off the rails and shows her flair for White House talking points. It's almost as if she implies that Plame Wilson should have expected the White House to out her because the work she did touched on the question that sent her husband, Amb. Joseph Wilson, to Niger.

COURIC: You never for a moment thought this could potentially jeopardize my career?
PLAME: It's called 'living your cover.' This had nothing to do with what I was doing. He was part of the debate.
COURIC: But admit it, it comes awfully close to what you were doing, even covertly. I mean, you were trying to ascertain if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He's writing an article saying 'it's really not valid, this one assertion.' I mean, can't you see how those two things might collide and in a very dangerous way?
Couric should be embarassed for her arsenal of GOP talking points disguised as an interview. Seriously, this is a covert agent telling you that national security was compromised and you think this is the kind of question that needed to be asked?
Can you understand how people just were turned off by that whole thing? They felt "Gee, maybe she's enjoying her celebrity a little too much."
She even at one point accused Valerie of being very partisan and Joseph Wilson of still seething... can you believe that hackery? Did it ever cross her mind to ask that of President Bush in her softball interview from Iraq? Of course not.

To the end, the Wilsons held strong to the truth and never backed down, even when the CIA made it difficult for her to publish her own book on the events, Fair Game, eventually redacting 10% of it.
Couric: "Do you think President Bush was in on this?"
Plame: "I don't know about that, but I, like most other Americans saw President Bush say on TV that he would fire anyone from his administration found to be involved in the leak of my name. It turns out, the president is not a man of his word."

Fair Game, eventually redacting 10% of it.&topic=politics">Digg!

Tagged as: cia, cheney, bush administration, plame, wilson, couric, 60 minutes, cia leak

Logan Murphy is a blogger for Crooks and Liars


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
GOP shill
Posted by: outlander55 on Oct 22, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Katie is just another drone when it comes to supporting the administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GOP shill Posted by: CJC
» That would be because Plame... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Valerie was great
Posted by: ncdemmom on Oct 22, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but I thought Joe Wilson got in the best line at the end of the interview. He responded to Katie's "You're still seething" accusation by saying yes he was, because the administration went after his family instead of him. Katie whined that well, Scooter Libby's wife wasn't with the CIA, and Joe jumped right on her and said "How do you know?" Then she said the same thing about Karl Rove's wife and again he said "How do you know? Nobody outed them, so we don't know." Katie could not think of a thing to say to THAT. She is ridiculous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So Katie Couric sides with the traitors...
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 22, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd stop watching her, but then again, I never actually started.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bizby
Posted by: Bizby on Oct 22, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Help!!! What is she talking about?

Couric said (roughly) "Don't you see how those two things [Plame's work on WMD investigation and Wilson's trip to Niger] could collide in a dangerous way."

I do not see how those two things could collide at all? I'm totally serious. How could they collide (short of someone with official clearance might "out" her). Why would they collide?

If someone can explain this to me I'd be grateful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bizby Posted by: Lauren
The joke's on Katie.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 22, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching Katie Couric interview Valerie Plame last night on "60 Minutes," I lost track for a short time in the second segment as to whom the interview was about. Apparently, by interjecting her opinions and those of her talking points handlers, Katie thought the interview was about HER.

This has been her problem for a long time and one of the reasons why the ratings of the CBS Evening News are augering in; but now, on "60 Minutes," she is also trying to become the new Mike Wallace. Without the charm. Or the integrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typical MSM BS
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 22, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Liberal" news media is just like "activist" judges. They don't exist. All these outlets sound like "PRAVDA" to me. Faux is the worst, but not by much. All sound like mouthpieces for "Dear Leader"and his repugnant gang.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA Angels and Cowboys
Posted by: peacelf on Oct 22, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Tom Robbins' last novel, Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates, his main character is a CIA agent who describes most CIA operatives as "Angels" or "Cowboys." The Cowboys are the agents who do what they're told, no matter the consequences of their actions. The Angels are the agents who believe in democracy, truth and justice and are willing to stick their necks out to preserve those ideals.

Which side is Valerie Plame on?

Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CIA Angels and Cowboys Posted by: Lauren
» RE: CIA Angels and Cowboys Posted by: Schroeder
Yeah, KC really sux
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Oct 22, 2007 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the Wilsons handled her really well.

I am so sick of rethug talking points flimsily camouflaged behind "some say" etc a la KC. I loathe her so much it ended my 30 year relationship with CBS news - or should I say "news" - and I am very near ending my 30 year relationship with 60 Minutes.

It has nothing to do with her sex - Lara Logan is one of the best and gutsiest war correspondents I have ever seen. I hope she ditches CBS soon and goes to work for a real news operation so I can watch her again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Katie Couric
Posted by: Rapunzel on Oct 22, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all of you who dislike Ms. Couric, consider going to CBS' website (cbsnews.com) and give them a piece of your mind! I, too, would like to see her go away!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Katie Couric Posted by: Schroeder
Valerie Plame
Posted by: Schroeder on Oct 22, 2007 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sorry I missed Valerie on both 60 Minutes and the Today show. Any where there's a recording?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Valerie Plame Posted by: kackermann
??? is it time to trim the fat...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Oct 25, 2007 4:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...of an over extended federal bureaucracy... ???

Would ending the confusion over security be better served with an easier chain of command structure than the current Byzantine bureaucratic model currently being deployed federally?

I mean really...
Does one branch of government [federal] really need the DHS, FBI DEA, ATF, Marshal Dillion and all his deputies et.al. ?? ... just to police the voting public?? and do we really need the CIA and all its baggage or could they also be absorbed in to a leaner and cleaner structure?

Also, do the laws passed to bring these policing vehicles best serve current policies or are they still serving policies that were made 100 years or more ago?
are they even relevant to today?

Also, does federal law naturally abrogate state domestic responsibility especially where domestic and federal policing authority negatively impacts basic guarantees under the constitution? [civil war redux?] as signers to the constitution do they not have a responsibility to uphold the guarantees they signed on to protect?

policing is only one area, and is the visible tip of the iceberg... there are hundreds more examples where federal authority trumps state authority throughout the diffrent agencieny throughout the federal system...

This bloated federal system needs a review...
top to bottom...
by an independent judicial panel...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]