Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Revisiting the Scene of O'Reilly's Most Despicable Moment [VIDEO]

Posted by Melissa McEwan at 4:50 AM on October 13, 2007.


The family of a kidnapping victim Bill O'Reilly smeared on the air, speaks out on Olbermann's "Countdown".
Family O'Reilly Vilified Fights Back

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Melissa McEwan, originally appeared on Shakesville

Back in January, in what was a ghastly display of revolting malice even by his standards, Bill O'Reilly said that he "hoped" 15-year-old Shawn Hornbeck, a boy who has just been found after being held captive by for four years by 41-year-old Michael Devlin, hadn't made "a conscious decision to accept his captivity because Devlin made things easy for him. No school, play all day long." O'Reilly also accused the boy of not escaping because he had "a lot more fun then when he had under his own parents. He didn't have to go to school; he could run around and do what he wanted," and bet that "when it all comes down, what's going to happen is, there was an element here that this kid liked about his circumstances."

Yesterday, Devlin pleaded guilty to the charges against him, and the court not only got to see a video of him torturing Hornbeck, but also heard some of the details of why the boy stayed with him for four years. You'll no doubt be shocked to hear it was not because there was "an element [he] liked about his circumstances."

[Trigger warning.]

Michael Devlin offered no apologies but shed light on why one of his victims stayed with him more than four years: The terrorized boy cut a deal just as Devlin was beginning to strangle him.
"This boy made this contract, this deal with the devil, only to survive," Washington County prosecutor John Rupp said.
...After the boy, then 11, was abducted at gunpoint while riding his bike in rural Washington County, Devlin took him to his apartment in suburban St. Louis and repeatedly sexually assaulted him. Days later, Devlin took Shawn back to Washington County in his pickup truck, apparently intent on killing the boy.
He said he pulled Shawn from his truck and began to strangle him. Shawn resisted.
"I attempted to kill (Shawn) and he talked me out of it," Devlin said Tuesday.
It's difficult on a normal day for me to accurately convey the profundity of my disgust for the loathesome creature O'Reilly; after reading about an 11-year-old child who had the presence of mind to strike a terrible, desperate bargain to save his own life, a child whom O'Reilly casually accused of enjoying his circumstances, I am left without the words to describe what I am feeling for that disgusting ghoul, who yet makes millions disgorging precisely this type of hateful swill night after night after night to be lapped up by people with no brains or souls.

Worse yet, he will probably never be taken to account for his nauseating comments about the brave and clever and admirable Shawn Hornbeck, now that the monstrous details of his detainment are emerging. And even if he were forced to revisit his heartless diarrheic bloviations, he would simply engage the excruciatingly familiar conservative trope that he couldn't have known. No one could possibly have known that it was not just inappropriate, but factually wrong to use this boy's devastating misfortune to launch another of his faux-macho-bravado, chest-beating, patriotic tirades about how "American children must be taught survival skills, must be prepared to face crisis situations. That is the lesson of the Shawn Hornbeck story."

Except, of course, that decent people did know. Decent people did say that it was complete, unmitigated horseshit to presume this child didn't use any survival skills: "I guess it would be far too much for [O'Reilly's] puny little brain to engage the thought that adaptability is not only one of humankind's greatest attributes, but also one of our strongest survival strategies--and kids especially manage to adapt to all kinds of grotesquery if they can be convinced their survival depends on it. If he had, he might realize that what appeared to him to be Hornbeck's preference for the kidnapped highlife might well have been in actuality his using 'survival skills' after all."

And of course that's exactly what happened. That little boy made a deal with the devil to be a sex slave if only the devil would let him live. That little boy saved his own life at 11 years old.

At 58 years old, Bill O'Reilly still hasn't figured out how to live a life worth saving.

[Via DBK]

Digg!

Tagged as: o'reilly, shawn hornbeck

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I wish we could return to traditional morality...
Posted by: goeswithness on Oct 13, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"until he's been there and been through what I've been through, he shouldn't judge other people."

The simple truth of this boy's statement, in the face of suffering dehumanization and victimization of all sorts, just humbles me and reminds me again that we really know how to treat each other; why do we keep forgetting?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I bet O'Reilly could be charged
Posted by: Beagle17 on Oct 13, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...in some countries, maybe. I don't really know, but it stands to reason that Shawn Hornbeck could easily claim damages in a suit. O'Reilly clearly harmed his reputation as well as his honor. That should make a good slander case I would think. And it looks like there is no way O'Reilly could argue truth as a defense.

He'd have to say it was his job to talk like and idiot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chickens coming home to roost. Or will it be to roast?
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 13, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billo will look all wide eyed and say, "me?"

It's difficult on a normal day for me to accurately convey the profundity of my disgust for the loathesome creature O'Reilly; after reading about an 11-year-old child who had the presence of mind to strike a terrible, desperate bargain to save his own life, a child whom O'Reilly casually accused of enjoying his circumstances,

I am left without the words to describe what I am feeling for that disgusting ghoul, who yet makes millions disgorging precisely this type of hateful swill night after night after night to be lapped up by people with no brains or souls.

O'Reilly: "American children must be taught survival skills, must be prepared to face crisis situations. That is the lesson of the Shawn Hornbeck story."

I agree with the author, and I felt that way watching Billo saying it on TV. I wonder (and worry) that people lap it up so. I think that is scary.

I really wonder about Billo's frame of mind. He has suggested a boy could enjoy this.
Is he also suggesting it is a survival skill? Suggesting it is good training for "crisis situations"? (Maybe perhaps the kind Billo is so good at dealing with?)

Is he implying this is something, "children must be taught"? This is dangerous language. I am worried about him and his 'message'. I sure am glad that liberty defending 'liberal' group, Media Matters, is watching him, zowie!


There is something happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear.
Hey, stop, everybody what's that sound? Everybody look, what's going down?

These parents have shown such an incredible amount of courage and fortitude throughout this whole ordeal. I was impressed, and of course, Keith was sensitive. I couldn't have done it, most parents couldn't really, I think. I am so impressed with their forward looking approach. Like a seed for what could grow into a mighty tree. Hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Biography. Who is O'Reilly?
Posted by: lc on Oct 13, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, somebody write an expose on O'Reilly. Is he an alcoholic? Did he use firecrackers to blow up frog's like Bush did as a kid? Was he in an Irish gang as a youth that beat up local blacks "who caused trouble"? How about his criminal record - DUI's, possession, assault, stalking? O'Reilly has to be living a double standard. It is time to expose his credentials. Who is Bill O'Reilly other than a rich white guy, a bigot and standard bearer of hypocrisies? I think he was an altar boy in his youth. Maybe he was molested by priests and is so closeted that he does not even know.
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easily a cause for a huge slander suit against Bill'O and Fox "news"..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Oct 13, 2007 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched live last night as I do almost every night Keith's broadcast..

The really most pertinent comments appropriate to O'Reilly's pernicious diatribe and and pusillanimous injurious remarks are not fit for mixed company and also, easily a due cause for a massive slander suit against him Bill'O and also Fox "news"..

Were I an attorney as I was raised to be I would do it for free or very nearly such as my duty in the interest of human decency..

At least $100,000,000.00 if not more..


Simple as that..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ignorant fool
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Oct 13, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill O is one of the most disgusting people on the planet. the fact that he is rewarded with fame and fortune is a sign of a truly sick society. How ANYONE can watch this man with anything other than contempt and disgust is beyond me.

I wish that female fox employee who had him on tape sexually harrassing her had gone public with the tapes instead of letting this devil pay her off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STILL FRIENDS OF BILL-O?
Posted by: Roverton on Oct 13, 2007 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any "Friend" who defends him after this is garbage, and should be tossed from our lives. Too many people on Earth.

A "Buddy" of mine tried to bully me with some sort of "Well Keith Olberman is just as bad" crap. "Why don't you move to Russia if you don't like that Bill tells it like it is?"

I just told him that he's a hypocritical asshole and I no longer care how he feels about that fact. I said I am embarrassed that I didn't notice sooner, what a shallow and anti-American jerk he actually is.

He said "Bu-But, you want communism to rule America, and homosexuals teaching children."

I responded by informing him that not only does his arsenal entirely with blanks, but-

A: If I'm such a bad American, why would he be hanging out with me?

B: A LION'S SHARE OF HIS heroes are closet gays.

C: Talking to him is like babysitting a kid who thinks THEY'RE the babysitter. Arrogant with NOTHING but bravado to back it up.

D: He tried one last time to bully me. He puffed up his chest and said that I'm not a real American. He said "Wanna take this outside?" I said "YOU call ME a bad American? Tell you what, swing at me once, and I'm going to slap you so hard, you'll cry in front of your girlfriend". He backed down, coward that he actually is.

E: I told him that if he decides to become a man again one day, I'd welcome him back. But the dirtbag that he is right now, fits poorly into my day.

Good people need to stick together now. I will easily endure never hearing from him again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This has to stop.
Posted by: ordaj on Oct 13, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone needs to punch Bill O'Reilly in the face. Perhaps a reward could be offered to anyone punching Bill or Anne Coulter in the face. They need their asses kicked. Their constant spew of hate and spin and lies cannot go unpunished. Jesus would do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this news?
Posted by: genefire on Oct 13, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get me wrong I believe that kid went through an terrible ordeal but is this news? Seeking an apology from a psychopath isn't news its insane!
This thing between Keith Olberman and Bill O'Reilly is really not news its turning into a soap opera and everyone just follows along as if there is nothing else better to observe!

Do you think you guys could work on concentrating on the things that effect all of us...Like reviving our Constitution!
This was made to spark emotions. What was beneficial out of this information for you...
Damn, This hurts me to see how gullible my fellow countryman have become....the mainstream talking heads know this and exploit this all of the time...WAKE UP PEOPLE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is this news? Posted by: mordcha81
Like Minds
Posted by: joonmoon on Oct 13, 2007 3:53 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given O'Reilly's own tendency as something of a predator himself, if the docket of the harassment suit he settled in 2004 is any proof, his comments and attitude here are at least understandable if no less unforgivable.

Like any aggressor, particularly a sexual one, O'Reilly's insensitivity shows an instinctive need to blame all violence on its recipient. Better that than accept that the behavior and its origins are all his own. The flipside, though, is that the failure to fight is regarded not as proof of the overwhelming force of an initial attack against a signficantly weaker target, but of the perverseness of the accused.

That the victim here was a child, physically smaller than his captor, taken at knifepoint and by surprise -- none of this registers because to O'Reilly the recipient of violence is and must always be to blame, having somehow provoked it even if after the fact. Captivity and abuse are not suffered by one who stays (despite the fact that the choice between death and further abuse is no choice at all): he must deserve what happened because he somehow wanted it.

We know that result and intent of violence, verbal, sexual, physical, emotional or otherwise, is to strip the recipient of all sense of power. It's only natural that Bill O'Reilly would side with power as such. As someone who uses the public forum quite literally as a bully pulpit, the principle that 'might makes right' makes it possible and reasonable for him to subject anyone who opposes or simply refuses him to verbal assault. Anyone who meets him with equal force, whether by arguing back or filing a lawsuit, is vilified as harboring an evil intent and O'Reilly transforms himself into the victim of an unreasoned ill will.

That he would here belittle the effects of violence and make a child responsible for the perversion of his rapist isn't surprising (though at least Devlin makes no such excuse for himself). It's a little like self-defense. It's a new low, yes -- great minds think alike -- but not completely unexpected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Faux News Strikes Again
Posted by: macdon1 on Oct 14, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does anyone even watch these fools? I think this young man is a real hero and deserves a lot of respect for being able to survive such a horrendous ordeal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You ever notice that these fools like O'Reilly and Limbag
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 14, 2007 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all life in FLORIDA? Pray for a hurricane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scum of the Earth
Posted by: nopuppy on Oct 14, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are this man and his kind still on the air? Because people still pay attention to them. If everyone stopped watching his nasty, pathetic show (and the equally revolting blatherings of Rush Limbaugh and the spiteful appearances of his sickening accomplices, Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin), they would be taken off the air, not from censorship, but lack of sponsorship.

They won't go away until we make them go away. When these people are hogging the airways, stay away. Watch reruns of Gilligan's Island or, better yet, read a book. Ignore them, and the networks will remove them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ignoring Them Hasn't Worked Posted by: colleenwhalen
i think the real issue may be...
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Oct 14, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
getting in the face of o'whoever's network. the network may also be on the hook here as they don't seem to have forced this shmuck to apologize or suspend him for his behaviour.

this bozo attacked a guy who's dad died on 911, and now an abducted child, it the network that is responsible for this garbage.

was it the DJ in rawnada that was trying to insite violence by encouraging a "race war" between huutus and tutsis responsible for the genocide that occurred, or was it the network.

This kind of hate mongering cannot be tolerated under the guise of "free speech" if america is to develop beyond a two-bit empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hear! Hear! Posted by: Mycos
Why doesn't the boys family sue for character assination and slander?
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Oct 14, 2007 12:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill O'Reilly had to pay millions of dollars in an out of court settlement for sexually harrssing a female journalist he supervised at Fox Channel. For a long time O'Reilly had been making pornographic sexually obscene phone calls the the woman's home. Although it is illegal to tape phone calls without a police warrant (except for Bush of course!) the woman had caller ID and answering machine. O'Reily would call her at home - she would let the tape pick it up to start the recording function - then when she heard his voice she would pick up the receiver so the entire conversation would be recorded - thus she was not technically breaking the wiretap law. Hundreds of sexually obscene phone calls of O'Relly were taped - later played on tv news programs.

Because he knew he would go to jail for obscene phone calls and lose in court - O'Reilly settled out of court with the female employeer and the journalist he sexually harrassed got millions in a lawsuit settlement.

Why doesn't the family of this boy SUE the dirt bag and clean his clock?

It seems Ann Coulter, Rush Lumbaugh, Bill O'Reilly can engage in slander, libel, character assassination and destroying anyone's reputation with their lies, rants and blatherings and nobody wants to put a stop to them. I quit listening to Air America becauese they play tapes of Ann Coulter, Rush Lumbaugh and Bill O'Reilly on the air and then wimpy comments about what big bad meanies these people are.

I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired - why dosn't somebody SUE these morons for libel and slander?

How much longer will their vitriolic hatred be tolerated?

Ann Coulter told Matt Lauer that the 9/11 widows and Jersey Girls should be assassinated and their children put in foster care" - Matt Lauer smile and said "Ann it is always such a pleasure to have you on our show". Isn't it a felony to encourage hate crimes and encourage death threats?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would hope Alternet readers might join me in making a list of companies...
Posted by: johngary66 on Oct 14, 2007 4:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who advertise on Fox. Chose some of the largest and write to them telling them you don't use their products because they advertise on Fox. Send a copy to Fox. Mention his smear of Shawn Hornbeck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blaming The Child All Through History
Posted by: Jack Saturday on Oct 15, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O'Reilly's view is widespread re child abuse, and its consequences include the Holocaust and other such historical events.

Alice Miller makes it clear in lucid, clear, unpretentious prose. Must reading for anyone who wants a better understanding of what underlies today's planetary situation. Read her books, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]