Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Vetoes Children's Health Bill, Leaves Millions Of Kids Without Coverage

Posted by Steve Benen at 12:00 PM on October 3, 2007.


Steve Benen: He's vetoed a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, a new stem-cell bill, and then today, health care for children.
Families USA ad

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

The president was very anxious to make his case against expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program in a very public way, complete with a press conference, a radio address, and a fairly aggressive media press. But when it came time to reject the bipartisan measure to provide access to care for millions of low-income families, Bush hid.

President Bush, in a confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.

It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

The White House sought as little attention as possible, with the president wielding his veto behind closed doors without any fanfare or news coverage.

John Kerry, noting that the president has "single-handedly jeopardized health care for millions of poor children," issued a compelling press statement:

"The President's twisted rationale that he opposes 'federalizing' health care is a hollow excuse for undermining a successful effort to give Governors the control and the tools to deliver health care for kids who desperately need it. President Bush conveniently forgot that he ran for reelection with a promise to give health care to millions more children and now as a lame duck president he is working to take it away. It seems George Bush was for kids' health care before he was against it."

As for what happens next, a pretty big campaign is about to get underway.

There's no question that Dems are going to press for a veto-override. They already have the votes in the Senate, and need a couple of dozen more in the House. With that in mind, the leadership sees no need to rush the override vote onto the floor.

House Democrats say they plan to send legislation expanding a children's health insurance program to President Bush later Tuesday, expecting him to veto it within hours. But an override vote might not come for days or weeks.

Democratic leaders said they might delay a showdown to allow pressure to build on House Republicans who oppose the legislation. Labor unions and religious groups announced campaigns to encourage GOP members to vote for an override.

[Majority Leader Steny Hoyer] offered no date for an override vote. "Maybe next week. Maybe the week after. There's no time limit," Hoyer said.

Families USA has already unveiled a new ad, the DCCC is running radio spots in key GOP House districts, and AFSCME said this week that a coalition of liberal groups will host more than 200 events nationwide to highlight the issue

For those keeping score, this is the fourth veto of Bush's presidency. He spent his first six years in the Oval Office without touching the veto pen -- he was the first president since John Adams to go an entire term in office without rejecting a single bill -- but ended the streak last summer, vetoing a bill to expand federal stem-cell research. Since then, he's vetoed funding for the troops in Iraq (because the measure included a timeline for withdrawal), a new stem-cell bill, and then today, healthcare for children.

Stay tuned.

Digg!

Tagged as: children, health care, bush administration, kerry, s-chip

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Religulous: Finally, a Movie for Atheists Like Me
Bill Maher questions religion's inherent contradictions in a new documentary.
Post by DJK. October 11, 2008.
McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.
Donna Brazile: "I'm Not Going to the Back of the Bus!"
An impassioned speech on racial politics from last week's New Yorker festival.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sadly Symbolic....
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 3, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government can never, ever be seen as a solution...It must ALWAYS be viewed as THE problem....This has been the mantra of the conservative movement for 25 years.....We've seen the train wreck of this ideology in Iraq and with Katrina. The depths that they will go to uphold this rigid dogma reached an (unsurprising) low point with the veto of the child health insurance bill.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JUST A MEAN S.O.B.
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 3, 2007 2:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has nothing to lose. He can do as he pleases with no consequences. Just ride out the rest of his presidency giving us all the finger. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sociopath
Posted by: dayenta on Oct 3, 2007 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's a sociopath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sociopath Posted by: tgabriel
DEMOCRATS: TAX WAR, NOT SMOKERS
Posted by: Puffin on Oct 3, 2007 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The funding plan for SCHIP calls for increasing taxes on only one segment of the population...that maligned minority, smokers. At sixty-one cents per pack, our household taxes would increase by $435 per year...almost one percent of our net income. That is grossly regressive and terribly unfair.

What's most troubling about it is that the rationale for this tax is that it might cause smokers to quit. If you follow that line of logic, the people who theoretically support SCHIP are hoping to see it de-funded.

SCHIP deserves to be vetoed, even if by the wrong person for the wrong reasons. And the Democrats need to find a fairer way of funding it next time it's proposed. Here's a novel idea....how about reducing the funding for the war and using the money for SCHIP? Gee, you think you could get the current crop of Democrats to go for it?

In the meantime, I think all good Democrats have an obligation to take up smoking. After all, it's for the children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this comes at no suprise to me....
Posted by: eosrk on Oct 3, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...him and his War Machine dosen't give even a damn about the troops on the ground----excluding the pilots, with the exception of helo-pilots whom are subject to hellified rockets everyday;
...the hell with the Americans whom kept him and his deranged party, along with a lot of help from top Dipshitcrats;
....the hell with the UN, IAEA, NATO, the orginal intel reports, and to most of all, HIS OWN FATHER;

Makes sense when you watch that lil' Bush Episode when his lil' Cheney is stuck inside the other bush and his dad says; " My goodness, I hope we don't bring in this world another half-wit!

lolololololol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What did you expect?
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Oct 4, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said he would and he did. This idiot has nothing to lose and being the bully that he continues to exhibit as the lame duck that he was when he originally took office, why would anyone be surprised by his lameness now. The Bush Dynasty is and has always been flawed. Keep your eyes on Florida, oh myyyyyyyyyyyy another one waiting in the wings!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What did you expect? Posted by: bettyn
Check the facts.
Posted by: Nugeman on Oct 4, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1/3 of children already have private coverage. In some places a family making up to $80,000 annually gets free coverage. Illegal aliens get free coverage. This had to be vetoed. Congress needs to work on this Schip program more.
Then Bush will sign it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Check the facts. Posted by: monkeywrench
» nugeman is a troll Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Smokers for Children
Posted by: tommy1957 on Oct 4, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First Bush has shown his true colors; only the rich and/or well off deserve health care. As far as the struggling middle class whose employers who have dropped their health care plans for them, well maybe they should just work a little hard, maybe part time at Wal-Mart. As for myself (Bush speaking) I am covered for life. LOSER! But of course when some like Ted Kennedy or Hillary Clinton want to come up with a way that covered all Americans, how many of you that are now in dire straights supported them? I have always been an advocate of universal health care, but being up against powerful lobbyist who run slick commercials telling people they will have to wait weeks and months to see a doctor; it was until now a lost cause. It only makes sense to me that if we have a healthily population, we will have a more productive population. Of course, we need to actually produce something to be productive, don’t we? Now my second thought, the idea that smokers will pay for this health care is great. Smokers wind up in most case costing the tax payers billion in unpaid medical care costs. It is a way to get even before they die from lung cancer. Please smoke-up; and if you are a conservative and/or republican, I hope you live long and smoke even more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Humanity
Posted by: Solar Wind on Oct 4, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems this cretin hates anything that BENEFITS humanity. His is a dark and evil soul and we can only open that he can suffer. I have my doubts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tells us what we're in for
Posted by: willymack on Oct 4, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At present and in the future. Giving children a helping hand at government expense is a direct threat to Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and Big Medicine as it's viewed as the beginning of universal health care, with the Big Three out of the (obscenely profitable) picture. Horrors! They'll move heaven and earth to prevent the institution of universal health care under ANY administration, and, if by some miracle, it passes through Congress and is signed into law, they'll try their best to undermine and destroy it from day one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm....
Posted by: jrobertclark on Oct 9, 2007 11:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now lemme get this straight:

Bush gets primo taxpayer-funded health care for life YET
he vetoes a slight expansion of a successful program providing care to poor children at a cost of a fraction of the monthly expenses for his ongoing Mideast follies, and explains this by his opposition to "socialized medicine." There's that dirty word again, "socialized" as in "Commie-sized" or "liberalized" or....

What a fraud... no, he's just a heartless asshole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]