Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Olbermann to Bush: "Your Hypocrisy Is So Vast" [VIDEO]

Posted by Adam Howard at 5:43 AM on September 21, 2007.


In a special comment, Olbermann challenges Bush on his MoveOn critique and more.
Olbermann to Bush:

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

So the President, behaving a little bit more than usual, like we would all interrupt him while he was watching his favorite cartoons on the DVR, stepped before the press conference microphone and after side-stepping most of the substantive issues like the Israeli raid on Syria, in condescending and infuriating fashion, produced a big political finish that indicates, certainly, that if it wasn’t already – the annual Republican witch-hunting season is underway.

“I thought the ad was disgusting. I felt like the ad was an attack not only on General Petraeus, but on the U.S. Military.”

“And I was disappointed that not more leaders in the Democrat party spoke out strongly against that kind of ad.

“And that leads me to come to this conclusion: that most Democrats are afraid of irritating a left-wing group like Moveon.org or more afraid of irritating them, than they are of irritating the United States military.”

“That was a sorry deal.”

First off, it’s “Democrat-ic” party.

You keep pretending you’re not a politician, so stop using words your party made up. Show a little respect.

Secondly, you could say this seriously after the advertising/mugging of Senator Max Cleland? After the swift-boating of John Kerry?

But most importantly, making that the last question?

So that there was no chance at a follow-up?

So nobody could point out, as Chris Matthews so incisively did, a week ago tonight, that you were the one who inappropriately interjected General Petraeus into the political dialogue of this nation in the first place!

Deliberately, premeditatedly, and virtually without precedent, you shanghaied a military man as your personal spokesman and now you’re complaining about the outcome, and then running away from the microphone?

Eleven months ago the President’s own party, the Republican National Committee, introduced this very different kind of advertisement, just nineteen days before the mid-term elections.

Bin Laden.

Al-Zawahiri’s rumored quote of six years ago about having bought “suitcase bombs.”

All set against a ticking clock, and finally a blinding explosion and the dire announcement:

“These are the stakes - vote, November 7th.”

That one was ok, Mr. Bush?

Terrorizing your own people in hopes of getting them to vote for your own party has never brought as much as a public comment from you?

The Republican Hamstringing of Captain Max Cleland and lying about Lieutenant John Kerry met with your approval?

But a shot at General Petraeus, about whom you conveniently ignore it, was you who reduced him from four-star hero to a political hack, merits this pissy juvenile blast at the Democrats on national television?

Your hypocrisy is so vast that if we could somehow use it to fill the ranks in Iraq you could realize your dream and keep us fighting there until the year 3000.

The line between the military and the civilian government is not to be crossed.

When Douglas MacArthur attempted to make policy for the United States in Korea half a century ago, President Truman moved quickly to fire him, even though Truman knew it meant his own political suicide, and the deification of a General who history suggests had begun to lose his mind.

When George McClellan tried to make policy for the Union in the Civil War, President Lincoln finally fired his chief General, even though he knew McClellan could galvanize political opposition which he did when McClellan ran as Lincoln’s presidential opponent in 1864, nearly defeating our greatest president.

Even when the conduit flowed the other way and Senator Joseph McCarthy tried to smear the Army because it wouldn’t defer the service of one of McCarthy’s staff aides, the entire civilian and Defense Department structures, after four years of fearful servitude, rose up against McCarthy and said “enough” and buried him.

The list is not endless but it is instructive.

Air Force General LeMay—who broke with Kennedy over the Cuban Missile Crisis and was retired.

Army General Edwin Anderson Walker—who started passing out John Birch Society leaflets to his soldiers.

Marine General Smedley Butler—who revealed to Congress the makings of a plot to remove FDR as President and for merely being approached by the plotters, was phased out of the military hierarchy.

These careers were ended because the line between the military and the civilian is not to be crossed!

Mr. Bush, you had no right to order General Petraeus to become your front man.

And he obviously should have refused that order and resigned rather than ruin his military career.

The upshot is and contrary it is, to the MoveOn advertisement he betrayed himself more than he did us.

But there has been in his actions a sort of reflexive courage, some twisted vision of duty at a time of crisis. That the man doesn’t understand that serving officers cannot double as serving political ops, is not so much his fault as it is your good, exploitable, fortune.

But Mr. Bush, you have hidden behind the General’s skirts, and today you have hidden behind the skirts of ‘the planted last question’ at a news conference, to indicate once again that your presidency has been about the tilted playing field, about no rules for your party in terms of character assassination and changing the fabric of our nation, and no right for your opponents or critics to as much as respond.

That is not only un-American but it is dictatorial.

And in pimping General David Petraeus and in the violation of everything this country has been assiduously and vigilantly against for 220 years, you have tried to blur the gleaming radioactive demarcation between the military and the political, and to portray your party as the one associated with the military, and your opponents as the ones somehow antithetical to it.

You did it again today and you need to know how history will judge the line you just crossed.

It is a line thankfully only the first of a series that makes the military political, and the political, military.

It is a line which history shows is always the first one crossed when a democratic government in some other country has started down the long, slippery, suicidal slope towards a Military Junta.

Get back behind that line, Mr. Bush, before some of your supporters mistake your dangerous transgression, for a call to further politicize our military.

Transcript comes via MSNBC

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, moveon, petraeus, olbermann

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
GOP Vetting Emporium and Taco Stand
Come for the vetting, stay for the tacos!
Post by Brave New Films. September 5, 2008.
The “P” in “POW” Does Not Stand for “President”
McCain is hellbent on playing the POW card to the bitter end.
Post by ZP Heller. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
give'em hell Keith
Posted by: mike1997 on Sep 21, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again Mr. Olberman hits the nail on the head. And once again the Democratic party declines to stand up to a political mugging by the President. The caving by the Democrats in this case is demoralizing to anyone who opposes this administration. What are we to do when we have no party to support and no party that supports us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: give'em hell Keith Posted by: judp2001
» RE: give'em hell Keith Posted by: FedUp
Hearts and Minds
Posted by: Roy Eidelson on Sep 21, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even more tragically, manipulation of public sentiment--as epitomized by the president’s press conference comments about MoveOn.org and the Democratic Party--lies at the very heart of the White House’s entire Iraq war enterprise. For those interested in a psychological analysis of this warmongering, I have recently completed a 10-minute online video entitled “Resisting the Drums of War.” It examines how the Bush administration’s messaging has targeted five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq--or an attack on Iran--will likely be sold to us in much the same way. The video examines these warmongering appeals and how to counter them. It’s available for viewing HERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember this . . .
Posted by: NamVeT on Sep 21, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The facts are stark and the facts are real...Our men and women in
uniform love their country more than their comfort. They have never failed
us, and we must not fail them. But the best intentions and the highest
morale are undermined by back-to-back deployments, poor pay, shortages
of spare parts and equipment, and rapidly declining readiness."

"...these are signs of a military in decline and we must do something
about it. The reasons are clear. Lack of equipment and material.
Undermaning of units. Overdeployment. Not enough time for family. Soldiers who
are on food stamps, and soldiers who are poorly housed. Dick Cheney
and I have a simple message today for our men and women in uniform, their
parents, their loved ones, their supporters: Help is on the way!"

"A generation shaped by Vietnam must remember the lessons of Vietnam.
When America uses force in the world, the cause must be just, the goal
must be clear, and the victory must be overwhelming."

"To build morale in today's United States military we must keep faith
with those who have worn the uniform in the past. We must keep faith
with America's veterans. . .And keeping faith also means giving our
veterans first-rate health care and treating the veterans with dignity. . .So
chaotic is the process there is now a backlog of nearly one
half-million claims. This is no way to treat any citizen, much less a veteran of
our armed forces. The veterans health-care system and the claims
process will be modernized, so that claims are handled in a fair and friendly
way."

"In my Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs will act as
an advocate for veterans seeking benefit claims, not act as an
adversary. Veterans who once stood in the line of fire to protect our freedom
should not have to stand in the line of a bureaucracy that is unwilling
to help them in their claims."

---George W. Bush VFW Speech - August 21, 2000

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» but...but... Posted by: somegirl
Absolutely
Posted by: outlander55 on Sep 21, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The condemning of MoveOn.orgs' ad has gone too far. What happened to free speech? And the Senate voted yesterday to not support the troops also. What the f**k is going on in D.C.?
1. In the 2002 campaign, draft dodger Saxby Chambliss ran an ad with pictures of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, then said Sen. Max Cleland lacked courage. Max Cleland left three limbs in Vietnam.
2. John Kerry earned five major medals in combat: the Silver Star, the Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts. And yet supporters of Bush and Cheney decided to smear his war record.
3.In the 2002 campaign, Sen. Tom Daschle was slammed by being compared to Saddam Hussien. Daschle is an Air Force veteran.
It is quite alright for the Repugnants to bash Democrats and anyone else who opposes this illegal war, but when confronted by free speech, they run screaming and crying to mommy.
It's time to get real. Amerika is sliding toward a Fascist Dictatorship and the majority of the people are just burying their heads in the sand and ignoring it. So much for the American way.
Good night and good luck...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Absolutely Posted by: blitzmesser
The First Ammendment Guarantees Freedom of Speech
Posted by: james2021 on Sep 21, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Errrr, at least it use to.

This Dictator will deny everyone the freedom to speak their mind. Especially if it is critical of the Repugwican Rule.

No one should be allowed to silence/condem anyone for exercising their freedom of speech.

If Dumbya doesn't like it, TOUGH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military/politics
Posted by: sliver on Sep 21, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Olbermann points out, the Republicans are guilty of politicizing the military. Even worse is the way they are militarizing politics and public discourse. You can't say anything logical about peace without the crazed pro-war Republicans calling you a traitor.

The next step is martial law. We should be impeaching Bush so he can't take that next step.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Military/politics Posted by: ad132
» RE: Military/politics Posted by: Ellie1
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
I nominate:
Posted by: jack alexander on Sep 21, 2007 2:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Olberman for president. Any seconds?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I nominate: Posted by: dayenta
» RE: I nominate: Posted by: FedUp
» RE: I nominate: Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: I nominate: Olbermann Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: I nominate: Olbermann Posted by: peacefullaim
Keith Olbermann Rules
Posted by: EricPrentis on Sep 22, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hurray for Keith Olbermann, Olbermann for president!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please consider becoming president. Please!!!!
Posted by: blitzmesser on Sep 22, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please Please please.
You are brilliant and also have your heart on the right side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great Balls of Fire!!!
Posted by: indiangreek on Sep 22, 2007 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great Kudos to Mr. Olbermann for calling it like (we) see it-- to hammer the hypocritical Bush Administration EVERY TIME THEY CROSS THAT LINE. If I was in a financial position to do so, I'd give the man a raise!! Way to go--and keep going, sir! You Rock! If the American People will simply open their eyes, it is plainly obvious that the Bush Administration is working so hard to literally MERGE the government and the military into the Fascist United States of America. It's so convenient, isn't it? They get into office, by "losing" and then "finding" voting ballots (after filing a lawsuit, and forcing Gore to concede), and causing foul-ups in voting machines. They publicly rail against taxes and government programs, while in private they misappropriate (yours and mine) tax monies toward a war whipped up over false pretenses so that our industries can benefit from global domination of the oil fields of the Middle East, and make out like the Robber Barrons of old as they do business for the next 30-40 years in the oil business and "re-building" Iraq during what Condoleeza Rice says are the "birth-pangs" of Democracy (turn capitalist, or die, mate!), while, all the while raising the temperature of the Earth through global warming. The Right Wing doesn't want you to know this basic truth, and will try to blurr the line (of sight) of this developing situation, so that the general populace won't know what hit them. I sincerely hope that Homeland Security IS WATCHING me post these comments. I'm mad as Hell about the direction in which this country is headed. My Dad fought the Nazis in WWII, and I have inherited his backbone. If some Right-Wing Fruit-loop wants to take me on, I say go for it. My Dad never backed down, and neither will I.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Balls of Fire!!! Posted by: peacefullaim
Keith you don't fool me
Posted by: Captainmagic on Sep 23, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No way!! ...Don't you dare project yourself as a person representing the desenting voice of the American people. A voice that is supposed to make us believe that America has a conscience and shows us by your aggrevated vocal mauling of the Bush "etc" administration that, (under your msn banner) along with you, there are millions of Americans who share your horror at what is being allowed to happen under America's false flag of Democracy. No! no! No!! Don't give me that claptrap about it's them and not us whose at fault.....No NO No...When it comes right down to the tin tacks we all see just how it is that the American people operate.....yep your congress that is supposed to represent it's people, are telling us loud and clear. America-------amerika----there is no difference is there......Can you blame us for seeing exactly what is before us...No you don't fool me Keith.

Good Night and Good Luck....Really!

Captain OUT .. .. ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well done...
Posted by: andrushka on Sep 23, 2007 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but take care of yourself Keith, look around and behind you, just in case. Meanwhile, speedy recovery!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

karl is that you again
Posted by: joey5 on Sep 23, 2007 4:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The swiftboaters attacked and defeated Moveon on the floor of congress and on the public stage.. Can you believe it? Are they ready for the election or what? Swift boating is very hard to define but you know it when you see it. The only thing you can say for sure about swiftboating is that if Karl Rove and his blackberry were hit by a bus the swiftboating would stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You Keith, your words speak for all of us!
Posted by: tommy1957 on Sep 25, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Bush's news conference proves one thing and one thing only; he is a coward. He was a coward during the Vietnam War which was lost due to the incompetence of the republican leadership; and he is a coward now due to the incompetence of the republican leadership. Only a coward will not back up words. What makes me truly sad is the number military members who believe in this loser. Do they not know that it is easy to send men and women into battle when you personally have nothing to lose. If he believes in this war whole heartily; why haven't his own daughters joined in the fight? Like their father before them, they are also cowards, yet they openly support their father and his policies. History should remember this president as the most cowardly president in US history, surrounded by cowards; Dick; Karly; Pauly; etc., etc.. We can change the course of direction by voting all republicans out of office and giving the democrats true power to enact policy that will restore American pride.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]