Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Ron Paul: "All We're Doing In Iraq Is Saving Face"

Posted by Joe Sudbay at 6:40 AM on September 6, 2007.


Joe Sudbay: A live blog of the Fox News hosted GOP 2008 debate in New Hampshire.
Paul vs. Huckabee @ GOP Debate

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Joe Sudbay, originally appeared on AMERICABlog

Yes, the Republicans are debating again tonight -- on Fox News. Ugh. They are in New Hampshire at the University of New Hampshire (my alma mater, btw). Remember, there won't be a Democratic debate on Fox.

We'll liveblog as painful as it is...although the Republicans are usually good for a few laughs.

The candidates at the debate are going to be in a snit because Fred Thompson just announced on Leno that he's running.

If anyone says anything particularly inane, I'll try to get the video.

9:02 PM: The head of the New Hampshire Republican Party just thanked Fox for teaming up with them on this debate. Teaming up? Fox is the Republican Party channel.

9:04 PM: Brit Hume opens the festivities by asking about Fred Thompson - who blew off the debate for Leno. Gives them all a chance to take a whack at Thompson. McCain makes an age joke, yuk...and tell Fred "get out in the arena." Mitt is just laughing at his own stupid joke. God, he's annoying. Rudy thinks Fred did a pretty good job playing his part on Law & Order. What a bunch of clowns.

9:09 PM Wallace to Romney for challenging Giuliani on immigration...you couldn't even find the illegals on your front lawn. According to Mitt, Rudy's the reason we went from 3 million illegals to 12 million. Rudy also gets a question about "illegals." These Republicans are such immigrant bashers. When McCain gets an immigration question, he says American people have lost trust in us...because of Katrina. (When McCain says "us" he surely means the GOP, because they've failed at everything.)

They all keep mentioning keeping the borders secure...Huckabee said the government has ignored borders. Again, that mean the Bush administration has failed to keep our borders secure. Still.

Of course, Tancredo loves getting the immigrant bashing question. His whole campaign is based on immigrant bashing. Sounds like the GOP crowd in Durham loves the bashing, too.

Hunter gets a "viewer" question about building the border fence. He said he built the fence in San Diego...built the fence himself the way he makes it sound. And, Hunter takes a swipe at CNN.

9:20 PM...Carl Cameron even has a "man on the street" immigrant basher, too. Wow. Fox is leaving no immigrant bashing opportunity tonight. This clearly is the biggest issue for the GOP...over twenty minutes already. Mitt HATES AMNESTY and sanctuary cities. Got it?

9:25 PM. Wendell Goler asks Brownback about family values using the Larry Craig example, basically how can voters trust the GOP on family values when Larry Craig is one of them. Sam thinks Larry has taken responsibility, but Larry already "pulled the trigger" on leaving.

9:26 PM. Hunter gets an email question asking if Craig should leave immediately for the good of the party. He says yes...and thinks the GOP deals with these issues immediately.

9:28 PM. Romney gets an abortion question...he wants Roe v. Wade overturned, then allow states to ban it. That means Mitt would let some states still allow abortions and thus commit murder in GOP-speak. Huckabee wants a human life amendment.

9:29 PM: Goler asks Giuliani about guns using Fred Thompson's slam against NYC's gun laws. Fred is working the NRA vote apparently. (and lest we forget, Rudy has always been a strong proponent of gun control. He supported the assault weapons ban and wanted a national licensing system.)

9:32 PM: Ron Paul also gets a gun question...somehow Paul thinks there should be more guns on planes or something like that. He's hard to follow.

9:34 PM: The inevitable gay marriage question...should there be a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The person asking the question opposes the amendment. Brownback says yes citing inaccurate studies, of course.

HA..the ad during the break is from the Bush-backed pro-Iraq war group headed by Ari Fleischer.

9:39 PM...they're back. McCain gets a chance to attack Giuliani's lack of national security credentials. "I know war." Noting Giuliani still hasn't been to Iraq, Wallace wants to know if he'll go by the end of the year. Biggest lie of the night so far by Rudy: "I'm not running on what I did on September 11th." That's all he's running on.

9:44 PM Mitt gets a question about Iraq. His main point: "The surge has worked" but then says we're going to be able to see if the surge is working? HUH???

McCain picked up on that and said: THE SURGE IS WORKING....the great debate will take place in the Senate this month to see if we let the surge continue or surrender...we need to keep the surge going.

9:46 PM Great line from Ron Paul -- The people who are saying Iraq will be a bloodbath if we leave are the same people who said Iraq would be a cakewalk and we'd be paying for it with oil revenue. Why should we believe them now? Typically pro-war Wallace slams him by saying we should take our marching orders from Al Qaeda. Ron Paul fought back hard.

9:49 PM Brownback thinks we need a political surge in Iraq. The political process isn't working...and we need to recognize that reality.

9:51 PM Huckabee says we have to continue the surge. We broke it...we have to fix it. Great little exchange between Paul and Huckabee....Paul says we're losing elections over foreign policy...asks Huckabee how many more Americans he wants to lose to save face.

9:55 PM Hunter is a buffoon. Seriously. He is just a pompous, bloviating butthead. I don't even care what he says...and no one else cares either.

9:57 PM Tancredo just turned this into a war against radical Islam..it has nothing to do with Iraq. Oh, he's insane, too.

9:59 PM Creepy Carl Cameron is back with the person on the street interviews (from Young's restaurant)....a guy whose son is in Iraq lambasted Romney for equating the work his sons are doing on his campaign to military service. Romney stuttered, puffed out his chest and got into a war on jihad. And, he certainly hopes the surge is successful....Brit pushed to know if it is or isn't successful. Mitt thinks it is, but he's not sure. Huh? Mitt is NOT having a good night.

10:02 PM Goler asks Mitt about wiretapping...Mitt wants to wiretap mosques, but apparently wouldn't do it without approval. Okay, seriously, Mitt has no idea what he's talking about when he gets national security questions. He has platitudes and code words, but is so out of his league on these issues.

10:03 PM Tancredo still thinks torture like waterboarding is okay.

10:04 PM McCain gets the torture question. He quotes a general who said any info. we got from torture wouldn't outdo the damage it did. Those without military experience support torture according to McCain.

10:06 PM Giuliani: we can't close Gitmo. There's a reality that the liberal media and Dems. don't get. He wants an Iraq that will help us win the war on terror...now how that relates to Gitmo is unclear...but Rudy somehow mixed up the issues. Duncan Hunter also got a Gitmo question, but I refer to my comments above -- Hunter is a buffoon. Seriously, a buffoon.

10:09 PM Brownback wouldn't give his veep as much power as Bush gave Cheney.

10:11 PM Finally, a tax question so they can all outdo each other on who is the bigger tax cutter. Wallace wants to know why McCain won't sign the anti-tax pledge. McCain says the GOP has destroyed the confidence of their base by the rampant spending -- and notes the GOP corruption. But why won't McCain sign the pledge??? The pledge, the pledge, the pledge...that's all that matters. Why won't Rudy sign the pledge. It's all about the pledge....Mitt gets the tax question, too. You know Massachusetts is a Democratic state, right? He's going to get rid of the death tax which benefits the very rich, and which, of course, Mitt is.

10:18 PM Huckabee wants a fair tax.

10:20 PM Ron Paul. He's just fun to watch. We're sacrificing liberty for security -- and losing both.

10:22 PM Rudy gets a question about family values...because Rudy doesn't really have a great track record on family value issues. And, Rudy thinks private lives should be private. He's not perfect. Any issues in my private life do not affect my public performance. That was a lame answer.

10:28 PM Brit Hume asks an Iran attack hypothetical....these GOPers are looking for the next war. Ron Paul gets the question first and doesn't think we should launch a war..you know he's the only one. Paul says Israel has 200 - 300 nuclear weapons.

Tancredo and Hunter gave answers on this one, but they're nuts. No one cares what they think. No one.

WHY IS THING NOT OVER? IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE OVER AT 10:30 PM....it's soooo painful.

Brit Hume loves Brit Hume's hypothetical -- he's quite serious about it -- and wants the candidates to know just how real of a hypothetical it is. Fox probably thinks a war with Iran would be good for ratings.

Rudy answered the hypothetical but then said it would be foolish to answer a hypothetical like that.

Mitt gives some stupid answer about building consensus. He's not very good on the national security questions at all.

McCain thinks he is the only one on the stage who knows anything about national security.

Digg!

Tagged as: brownback, election08, mccain, republican party, giuliani, hunter, romney, huckabee, paul, thompson, tancredo

Joe Sudbay is a DC-based political consultant with over twenty years of experience at both the state and federal level.


McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.
Donna Brazile: "I'm Not Going to the Back of the Bus!"
An impassioned speech on racial politics from last week's New Yorker festival.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.
John Cusack Tackles War Profiteers Today on Meet the Bloggers
Today at 1pm ET/10am PT.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ron Paul is certainly praised by many posters in here, but he is merely
Posted by: Ellie1 on Sep 6, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an anti-war Republican, and a puppet of the anti-choice crowd. We don't need another conservative TEXAN in the White House (or anywhere else for that matter).

Now they will attack me again and accuse me of "ignorance" because I would never vote for this Texas Repuke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Like him or not Posted by: SteveO
» RE: My thoughts exactly Posted by: Techubus
Only viable candidates: Paul, Gravel, and Kuchinich. ALL others are totally
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Sep 6, 2007 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bought and paid for by the banking and corporations. Some, like Guiliani, probably, and Clinton, certainly, gain funds from foreign sources (the mysterious Mr.Wu, Mr.Trie and now this week the inscrutable Mr.Hsu fleeing jurisdiction. Most likely all proxy fund dispersal agents for the Chinese communist regime.) Edwards talks a decent game but his employment at a major hedge-fund renders his words as empty. As far as the other Republican candidates, forget it. Excepting the somewhat nutso Tancredo they are all TOTALLY corporately funded. Only Paul, Gravel, and Kuchinich are actually talking about the major issues of the day: the banking/insurance industry, the private Federal Reserve banking system, and the corruption of both parties (really one party of course.) Yes, they have different means, somewhat different views but at least those three are talking about the real issues.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul is the only intelligent Republican
Posted by: illuminatislave on Sep 6, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm for anybody that wants to end the madness in Iraq. Not only does Ron Paul want to end the war in Iraq, he has some good ideas about health care. As far as I can tell hes not owned by corporate America. He might actually represent the people of America instead of the corporations, like all the other republican candidates.

Always know: Those who control MSM are the real enemies of the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huckabee's Hooey
Posted by: lamar on Sep 6, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It requires somebody not beholden to corporate interests to shoot down Huckabee's hooey about leaving Iraq with honor. Sure, if you break it, you bought it...but I'm your father, we're not going to stay in that store so that you can break more things. You pay for it and you leave.

Thank god for Ron Paul, viable or not, right wing or not, we need more candidates like Ron Paul, i.e., candidates should state what they believe and let the voters decide if that's a message they want. Alternetters will likely not vote for Ron Paul, but at least they can have some faith that they actually know what Ron Paul stands for. Who can possibly say that for any of the other GOP candidates (and 1/2 the Democrats)?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huckabee's Hooey Posted by: Techubus
Grandstanders
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 6, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The line about saving face was spot-on, but the rest was crap.

Each audience member should have a button on the armrest so they can administer a shock everytime one of these bozos says something stupid. It would almost make these "debates" worth watching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprising
Posted by: l_m_n on Sep 6, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After Huckabee's "you broke it you bought it" tripe got so much applause, I thought it would be boos and hisses when Ron Paul got on his back about it. Nope.. he got applause too!

Even the staged Republican audience is getting fed up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It was mixed Posted by: Techubus
Ron Paul has guts to call it like it is
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Sep 6, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A balanced ticket would be Kucinich/Paul. Both want to end the war, protect our rights and get rid of the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. But...they are not CIA backed, Bilderberg backed or Council for Foreign Relations backed. So, the corporations will pay the tab for the campaign and the media will play hatchet job. All lies and greed. New World Order here we come. Hillary is poison, but if I were to guess, her handlers will see her through.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on.
Posted by: francomef on Sep 7, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There were enough blue hairs in that audience. I bet the average age of the audience was over 65. Go ask all the Iraqi people about America's F**KING HONOR. What a bunch of dip shits worring about our honor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No surprise about Romney
Posted by: francomef on Sep 7, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Romney is a Mormon and Mormonism is a racist religion so do the math. Can't wait until September Dawn hits the theaters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pauls position on abortion is spot on, and im a lefty.
Posted by: EEKman on Sep 8, 2007 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming from a doctor who has delivered 4000 babies, he can have any stance on abortion he wants. I dont care, Im a single white guy with no kids. Besides, hes got the best position on abortion one could have, leave the FEDS out of it. Abortion is a very personal decision between a patient, her family/support structure and her doctor. Paul wouldnt stand in the way of that. Leave it up to the states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont make Ron Paul in to something he is not.
Posted by: screamingdissent on Sep 9, 2007 10:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul is for banning abortions on a state basis. This is LIMITING a woman's individual personal choice. Ron Paul being a doctor is no more relevant to his poor opinion on this topic than Alberto Gonzalez, who was an attorney for 10-15 years, having a good opinion on civil rights. This is a sorry excuse if I've ever heard one. If you are for individual freedom, the state has no right to take that away. No one is asking Ron Paul to give those abortions, there are plenty of other (probably better) doctors who will. Liberty is about personal freedom.

Ron Paul does not believe global warming is a serious concern. He believes there are two sides to the "debate". This is republican propaganda. No serious scientists doubts the threat of global warming. On this issue, Ron Paul is just as ignorant as the other republican candidates. Do not reference me to "The Great Swindle". This documentary has been debunked to death. A scientist appearing in the documentary publicly stated he wished he never participated in that documentary, he was misled and misquoted. The director of the documentary is known for making controversial documentaries unsupported by evidence. This documentary's main argument of solar flairs causing global warming was removed, over 10 years ago, from scientific consensus.

Ron Paul has the same anti-immigration policy as the other republican candidates. His xenophobia of "illegals", sounds very similar to the conservative think tanks like the heritage foundation. Ron Paul said we have to secure our borders, voting for a large fence across it. Bill O' Reilly would have given Ron Paul a big hug for helping to preserve this "white Christian nation." Ron Paul loves the constitution, he quotes it all the time, but the constitution declares rights for all people, it never said Americans only.

Ron Paul also supports banning gay marriage. He loves liberty, but thinks the state can rightfully take away personal freedom that does not harm anyone. Ron Paul apologists have to pull off some clever acrobatics to explain this one. Please don't say he wants it banned only on a state basis. This does not confront the moral issue of this belief. If I were to say blacks will be allowed to vote on a state to state basis it would be absurd and ridiculous. The same should be thought with gays. No state or government can infringe on a human being's liberties. To support Ron Paul's belief, is a betrayal to such an ideal. Either you are for human rights and liberty or you are not.

Ron Paul is against Unions. Unions are slowly disappearing in america, yet the ignorant want to claim it is the few unions we have today that is causing the working class to work so much for so little! They are literally pawns in corporate propaganda. Unions force corporations to consider worker's rights before profits. We are isolated now, we blame follow workers, we blame immigrants, we blame government, but never blame the corporate tyranny. Be a good little slave. Ron Paul should bow in shame..

What's the point with the Ron Paul bashing? I know this question will be asked. He is after all the only anti-war republican candidate, and is against NAFTA and the WTO. Three things which should be admired. Even so, lets not make him in to something he is not. He does not transcend republican ideology on a lot of issues. He does not support liberty for everyone. If you are a conservative and he fits your beliefs, fine, that's great for you. Just stop trying to convince others he is something different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]