Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Cheney Told GOP-Led Congress They Couldn't Issue Subpoenas

Posted by Amanda Terkel at 5:12 AM on August 21, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: Sen. Leahy says, "Not quite sure that's my understanding of the separation of powers, but it seemed to work at that time."
Cheney Told GOP-Led Congress It Was Allowed to Issue Subpoenas

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, originally appeared on Think Progress

Yesterday in a press briefing, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) revealed that the White House had missed its 2:30 PM deadline to turn over documents to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding legal justifications for the National Security Agency's eavesdropping program. The Committee had already pushed back the original July 18 deadline twice after the White House requested more time.

Leahy said that the administration's stonewalling amounted to "contempt of the valid order of the Congress," and pointed out that these subpoenas were passed by broad bipartisan votes. In fact, the Senate Judiciary Committee in the conservative-led 109th Congress, chaired by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) also attempted to ask questions about the program's legal justifications. But Vice President Cheney personally barred him from issuing subpoenas:

In fact, we were about to issue subpoenas then and one of the senators came to our meeting and said that the vice president had met with the Republican senators and told them they were not allowed to issue subpoenas.
Not quite sure that's my understanding of the separation of powers, but it seemed to work at that time.
Watch the video to your right.

Leahy also said that while he didn't receive the requested documents, he did receive "a letter this morning from the Office of the Vice President identifying some documents that would be responsive to the committee's subpoena." In the letter, the administration claims the Office of the Vice President is not part of the Executive Office of the President.

Leahy responds, "Well, that's wrong. ... [O]h, incidentally, at least this morning, as I left Vermont, I checked the White House Web site. And even their own Web site, this morning, at least, says that the Executive Office -- that the vice president is part of the Executive Office of the President."

Digg!

Tagged as: congress, cheney, bush administration, leahy

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 21, 2007 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until you have them put in a cell or drug before congress by force you will see nothing change. There is never going to be cooperation from this white house. If you believe for one second there will be, you are a naive fool. Start having people rounded up and brought in by force to testify, start throwing people in cells for contempt or refusal to appear when subpoenaed... or you are never going to see anything happen, and checks and balances goes the way of the dinosaur.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well... Posted by: Nick
Time is Up...
Posted by: motamanx on Aug 21, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...or what? Give them more time? That would be the democrat's way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hiroshiman
Posted by: Hiroshiman on Aug 21, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems are pussies, they have no spine and they let these crimminals look them in the face and lie and they, do what? Nothing, that's what? I thought a change in Congress might actually effect some changes in our government, but they are unwilling to do anything. I am not sure of the constitutional powers that Congress holds but it seems that if someone shows absolute contempt for a major branch of Government there has to be a legal recourse for arrests or at the very least forced appearances before that body and perhaps the judiciary. Any constitutional lawyers out there want to enlighten us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Impeachment. Posted by: latteslave
» They are not pussies... Posted by: kackermann
» RE: They are not pussies... Posted by: Aimleft
Naughty congress
Posted by: Suz on Aug 21, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they would just leave the poor man alone, he could fully concentrate his Super American Vice-Presidential Powers to help himself and his Personal Planetary Posse better bilk this nation and the world, and have a more pleasant, easy task of concealing his bilkage from the rabble. Can't Congress see he's doesn't have time for this legal falderal? There's money out there he and his friends DON"T HAVE YET!

Nosy bastards. They'll pay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Naughty congress...sickofsleaze Posted by: wilmafromkansas
Cheney is too busy
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 21, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to reply to any ole subpeona. He's working on a surprise attack on Tehran and imposing martial law on us in October of 2008.

WHEN DOES THIS S**T END??????????????????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cheney is too busy Posted by: batteredup
» Just like Rudy tried to do Posted by: Aimleft
Yet, another way to say,
Posted by: Nick on Aug 21, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go and f..k yourself

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple as this.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 21, 2007 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can only hope that our representatives realize that they are fighting for our very form of government at the moment. If they refuse to act and call the white house to account as well as legally reaffirm that the VP is in fact NOT its own undefined branch of government, then we have all taken a very big step away from democracy and towards tyrany.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Simple as this. Posted by: sheena2u