Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bloomberg Thinks You Should Pay to Photograph New York

Posted by Guest Blogger at 12:00 PM on July 31, 2007.


Lindsay Beyerstein: Photography is an established form of free speech. We shouldn't have to get permission to exercise our First Amendment rights.
Bloomberg Shuttering Shutterbugs

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Lindsay Beyerstein, originally appeared on Majikthise

The Bloomberg administration is quietly pushing new regulations that would ban certain kinds of photography in New York City without a permit and $1 million in liability insurance:

The new rules, which were proposed by the Mayor's Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting, would require any group of two or more people who want to use a camera in a public place for more than 30 minutes to get a city permit and $1 million in liability insurance. The same requirements would apply to any group of five or more people who plan to use a tripod in a public location for more than 10 minutes, including the time it takes to set up the equipment. The permits would be free.
City officials said they would decide after next Friday whether to adopt the rules as they are, amend them or draft new rules and reopen the public review process. [NYT]
Ironically, Bloomberg is just fine with unlicensed cameras when they are trained on citizens in the name of security and fighting petty crime.

Photography is an established form of free speech. We shouldn't have to get permission or take out a million-dollar insurance policy in order to exercise our First Amendment rights.

It seems clear that this measure is designed discourage small-time filmmakers from shooting in the city. Cynics would speculate that the Mayor's Office of Film, Theater, and Television wants to create a monopoly for the big commercial filmmakers who generate revenue for the city.

The rules apply to still photographers as well. There are no exceptions for amateurs. It's not clear whether this ban will apply to journalists as well--nothing I've read suggests otherwise. Are they really saying that every camera crew in the city has to get a permit before it shows up to cover a story?

The New York Civil Liberties Association has pledged to sue the city if these unconstitutional restrictions become law.

Picture New York is a newly-formed advocacy group fighting the proposed restrictions. You can sign their e-petition here.

HT: Elana at DMIblog.

Update: Here are the proposed regulations in full. Based on my incomplete reading, there is a media exemption, but it applies only to those with pre-approved NYPD press passes.

Download moftb_permit_regs.pdf

Digg!

Tagged as: free speech, civil liberties, new york city, bloomberg, photography


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
gotdamnit!!
Posted by: eosrk on Jul 31, 2007 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They already make people pay for everyfuckin' thing, now the assholes want us to pay to take a picture of anything in New York. I say this, if we want to make a statement, here's how to do it........stop going there, and the hell with the rest of the big cities too.....in fact, let's just stop traveling altogether, espically with the price of gas nowadays, and we'll see just how long they can manage to survive, unless the law starts issuing out tickets and jail sentances for not traveling anywhere....I mean, it's a idea!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 31, 2007 12:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... just what we need. More huge unworkable largescale legislation ripe for abuse which keeps cops from fighting actual crime by diverting them (even if to a small degree) to fighting something that isn't actually a problem at all.. and if it is ever a problem can easily be handled under pre-existing laws such as public niusance, etc...

This is right up there with the wine vs. beer debacle this rich classist asshole started.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great... Posted by: Doubtom
Outsourcing Surveillance - Fencing The Commons
Posted by: eddie torres on Jul 31, 2007 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The permits may be free, but $1 million dollars in liability insurance doesn't come cheap if the city and the state maintain strict control over how many insurers are allowed to offer this type of coverage.

This sounds a lot more like sowing the seeds for an eventual NYC-wide outsourced surveillance camera network - where private security companies will be licensed to install and monitor cameras and provide the data to NYC law enforcement and disaster agencies.

And they'll be allowed to 'actively discourage' anyone they spot filming without a permit. Like when street thugs challenge each other to a duel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I apologize in advance, but...
Posted by: gerty954 on Jul 31, 2007 1:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...my initial thought was that they are preparing NYC for the next 9/11. In that, far too many cameras caught too much on film on 9/11/01...they want to better protect themselves this time around.

I know this thought is pathetic, paranoid, call it what you will, but with this freaking administration, you just never know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I apologize in advance, but... Posted by: blitzmesser
Unfortunately, not a new idea...
Posted by: katz22br on Jul 31, 2007 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to pay for a license, too, if you want to take pictures in Coral Gables, Florida. It's not like there's a policeman in each corner waiting to fine you, but... they could.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comes as a surprise?
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Jul 31, 2007 11:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country is FASCIST. This is the way fascism works! As the old saying from the intellectually challenged goes, "If you don't like America, leave!" Hahahahha.

Anyway, I caught wind of this on Democracy Now this morning. Sadly I felt no surprise in regards to this issue. New York is a cesspool of corruption, filth and lies. It is the heart of the Financial Banking institutions and the numerous tools of oppression of the elite. For them to inact policies to protect their MASTERS and their MASTERS interest, should come as no surprise.

What Everyone Should Know

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Soviet tendencies
Posted by: Benjaminsjw on Aug 1, 2007 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yup, it is getting more and more evident that the US is turning into a totalitarian state.
When I first visited Latvia, in the late nineties, I was amazed to find that on several occasions I had to pay extra to bring my camera along into certain tourist venues. It was only a minute amount, but it was the concept that struck me as odd.
Why should I hove to pay in order to take a picture from the top of a church tower?
Anyway, I wasn't planning on visited NY (or the US for that matter) any time soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MUCH ADO ABOUT VERY LITTLE
Posted by: LouisFallert on Aug 1, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the entire handout, (though I had to go to the original to be able to since the link here didn't work), and it seems very reasonable to me. Come on people! In this ordinance they are talking about not closing streets without permission and keeping a 13.5 foot traffic lane open, cleaning up afterwards, not having pyrotechnics without permission from the fire department. It is not aimed at stopping free speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MUCH ADO ABOUT VERY LITTLE Posted by: alarew666
Same old, same old
Posted by: wavydavy on Aug 1, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a variation on the previous law that made it illegal to take ANY photos at all in a subway station. Which law was declared unconstitutional when tested in court. Much as this one will be, no doubt.

As a long-time resident of NYC, I generally prefer Mayor Mike over his immediate predecessor, Adolph Giuliani, for many reasons (such as not being a racist pig). However, he seems to have adopted the same paranoid view of the First Amendment.

Fortunately, so far, the courts have basically declared all this to be the nonsense it is (the City defended over 100 First Amendment cases during Adolph's reign, and lost every one of them, costing the City over $100 million in damages).

Unfortunately, nobody knows how much longer the courts will keep doing this, especially given the recent trend of appointing judges who are slightly to the left of Attila the Hun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOW I'VE HEARD IT ALL - What next, pay to cross a street.
Posted by: 1984NOW!!! on Aug 1, 2007 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
INSANE. FASCISTIC, FIRST AMENDMENT REPRESSION, SUFFOCATING, DICTATORIAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bloomberg is a hypocrite
Posted by: blitzmesser on Aug 1, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Her pretends to take the train but uses two cars to get to the train station further away, so he wont have to change trains. He lives just 4 blocks away fom a train station.
He was watched for 5 weeks by New York Times reporters.
He is a crook and liar.
I hope nobody listens to his absurd proposal.
Bloomberg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

j
Posted by: jmp3954 on Aug 2, 2007 10:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So who still thinks he'd be a good third-party candidate for President?

This asshole is every bit as much a fascist as Giuliani, especially when it comes to the police. They both believe that the right of the state to maintain public order almost always trumps the rights and liberties of individuals, and that belief is at the core of modern totalitarianism.

The NYPD sent its spies out all over the world as part of the preparations for the Republican convention in 2004 - the NYPD apparently had its own CIA, which attempted to infiltrate groups considered likely to attempt to disrupt the convention, both in the US and abroad. And thousands of people were detained illegally by Bloomberg's cops during the convention, swept up in mass arrests that included many people who weren't involved in the protests at all - they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]