Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Michael Moore, Chris Matthews and An Insurance Company Conspiracy

Posted by Guest Blogger at 6:04 AM on July 27, 2007.


Jane Hamsher: Why did health insurance companies start covering up their relationships with journalists after Michael Moore appeared on Chris Matthews' "Hardball"?
Matthews Attacks Audience Member

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Jane Hamsher, originally appeared on FireDogLake

When Michael Moore made his appearance on Hardball this week, Tweety got his feathers ruffled by a questioner who asked about Big Pharma's influence over the media:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Hi, Michael. I'm Mark Kohler (ph) from Penn State University. I have a quick question for you. What do you think it's going to take to remove the pharmaceutical industry's influence over the media and politicians in general?

MATTHEWS: What's the influence over the media, first off, buddy? What's the influence over me?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Have you watched the nightly news ever once? The amount of advertisements for any kind of pharmaceutical drug is so prevalent, especially during the dinner hour -

(CROSS TALK)

MATTHEWS: Do you have any evidence that the nightly news producers are affected by the advertising?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Not in my pocket.

MATTHEWS: You do have some evidence? What's the evidence.

Tweety ought to be reading Kos. On that very same day, nyceve had a diary up about the relationship between several prominent journalists and the AHIP:

Nancy Snyderman, MD, the health corresponded for NBC News, Robert Bazell another NBC news health correspondent and very sadly, Susan Dentzer of the News Hour all participate on the AHIP Speakers Network.

For those of you new to their racket, AHIP (America's Health Insurance Plans) is the trade association which represents the for-profit insurance industry in the United States.

Now the insurance lobby isn't technically Big Pharma but they both represent enormous institutional roadblocks to serious health care reform in this country, and it is via mechanisms like the AHIP Speakers Network that money is funneled to journalists ("buckraking") and it sure ain't because they're out there swinging for the fences on behalf of single payer.

As Eve points out in her diary, one of the "facts" presented on the AHIP website is that "[a]ll the talk about creating universal coverage has obscured the fact that most voters already have insurance."

O-key-dokey.

Media Matters is reporting today that after Eve's blog post went up, the three journalists were removed from AHIP's list of speakers, though their bios remain elsewhere on the site.

When people ask about the value of amateurs in the blogosphere versus "professional journalist" I think this particular example is worth pointing to. Using publicly available materials Eve whipped Matthews' ass. His high dudgeon was shockingly misplaced, and if this is an example of his level of sophistication on the matter he needs to do some serious research before he wades into these waters again.

It's that kind of ignorance that renders Our Elite Media a bunch of hand-wringing toadies mindlessly repeating special interest talking points with no awareness that they're acting like complete tools.

Digg!

Tagged as: media, health care, sicko, moore, matthews, health insurance companie

Jane Hamsher is the founder of Firedoglake.com. Her work has also appeared on the Huffington Post, Alternet and The American Prospect.


McCain-Palin Rally Attendees Say Incredible, Ridiculous Things
File this one under the "give 'em enough rope" column.
Post by Seth Colter Walls. October 10, 2008.
Donna Brazile: "I'm Not Going to the Back of the Bus!"
An impassioned speech on racial politics from last week's New Yorker festival.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.
John Cusack Tackles War Profiteers Today on Meet the Bloggers
Today at 1pm ET/10am PT.
Post by ZP Heller. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Small potatoes.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jul 27, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The legal bribery of news personnel is very small potatoes when compared to the advertising revenue to all forms of the media by the pharmaceuticals. The harm done by this media bribery by pharmaceuticals is again small potatoes when compared to the harm done by the entire corporate establishment's legal bribery of both of our political parties with campaign contributions and million dollar lobbies.

In my opinion, anyone who thinks that the voters have representation in our government is terminally naive. We have limited choice. Vote for the absolutely evil party, the not quite so evil party, or a a less evil third party that has no chance of winning.

Until we, the people, take control of both parties we will be governed by the corporatocracy.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Small potatoes. Posted by: pappy1
We --The Public-- PAY For These Advertisements ....
Posted by: chomsky on Jul 27, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“It is very difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” -Upton Sinclair

I watched (the consistently inconsistent) Matthews go after this guy for asking this question; The first thing I though of was "How expensive it is to put so many commercials on air during prime time...?" That Viagra banner behind home plate at every Major League Baseball stadium surely costs those boners an extra buck or so (pun slightly intended) and baseball season is a long way away from The Superbowl and it's notoriously inflated advertising costs ...The consumers who use these advertised meds pay for that advertising, and probably then some; EVERYTHING SOLD has a profit margin.

The answer, Mr. Matthews, is that when you're being payed (persistently -and rather handsomely) to show their products, common sense would dictate that you'll most certainly be less inclined to criticize them; and defend them from any attack, just EXACTLY AS YOU DID when this guy asked this totally legitimate question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent talking point
Posted by: eddie torres on Jul 27, 2007 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AHIP: "[a]ll the talk about creating universal coverage has obscured the fact that most voters already have insurance."

100% correct. All voters - that is, the number of people who physically show up at the polls or cast absentee ballots - are about 50% of all eligible voters. And most actual voters are over 40 years old. Which is a very lucrative target demo for advertisers - hence the avalanche of "purple pill" ads in prime time news. The other 50% of eligible voters who don't show up at the polls? Busy working, and probably undercovered in healthcare terms.

Since most over-40s already have some form of healthcare coverage, why should they care about single payer? That's someone else's fight. Unless, of course, somebody over 40 owns a business that employs other Americans and must tack on the cost of healthcare coverage to the price of the good or service produced. Which makes it awfully difficult to compete in an industry that is open to overseas competitors.

Can't accuse AHIP of lying, but they're certainly distorting the economic reality behind the issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Excellent talking point Posted by: hagwind
Big Pharma, FDA, AMA & The Psychs
Posted by: Freedom101 on Jul 27, 2007 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Pharma, Psychiatry, and the FDA have untold Power over our minds and body, from Public Schools to the university's to the high courts and military institutions. There has Never been a Conspiracy. Just Greed, Power, Cooperation, and agreements to make a huge profit and control the masses.

Big Pharma/Psychiatry is now the new opiate of the masses. Ever since the horse drawn snake oil sales men and the Psychiatric Mad House for public amusement there has been huge profit in human suffering. It's not surprising Matthews would have contractual agreements to protect the advertisers bottom line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chris Matthews
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 27, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
must go through a lot of kneepads.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chris Mathews is a pain. I STOPPED WATCHING HIM YEARS AGO.
Posted by: SALLY EVANS on Jul 27, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched this video to see what Michael Moore had to say but Mathews is agressively obnoxious. It is difficult to make any kind of significant statements with Chris as Moderator. I would like to see someone who knows how to communicate. Chris always verbally assaults like he is competing with some invisible source. Michael Moore is a true American who cares about what happens to our citizens. Chris needs another job like carnival barker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Advertising
Posted by: JSquercia on Jul 27, 2007 4:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time when Drug Companies were NOT allowed to Advertise on TV . I don't know when that changed but now Big Pharma spends as much on Advertising as do on
R & D . Much of the research is devoted to copying already existing drugs and NOT new ground breaking research . As an example look at all the pills for ED Viagra, Levetra , and Cialis . We also get pills for diseases no one ever heard of before what the hells is restless leg syndrom .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The play's the thing
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Jul 28, 2007 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methinks tweety boid doth chirp/protest too much. He knows the score, if not consciously, in his gulity subconscious mind. He's been in the MSM news game for what 30 years? He knows it's gotten even more ratings-, advertiser-, and big corpocracy pleasing (read: big money interests propaganda spinning) over the years....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read between the lines/lies
Posted by: lc on Jul 28, 2007 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key word is "voters" because most healty people who have insurance, and enough money to pay for it, make a point to also "vote." Children don't vote and the homeless and the poor who are uninsurred, in general, do not vote.
If you do not vote, you do not count. That is the GOP mantra.
Qualifying their words is standard tatics for the GOP spinmeisters. So AHIP can truthfully say that "most voters" are insurred but the average person reading the sentence will place it into the greater context and assume that most of the population has health insurance. The quoate follows:

"As Eve points out in her diary, one of the "facts" presented on the AHIP website is that "[a]ll the talk about creating universal coverage has obscured the fact that most voters already have insurance."
Cheers
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anyone remember
Posted by: bettyn on Jul 28, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when "TWEETY" (I love that!) was actually a Democrat? Boy, has he changed...and let's not forget his brother was the GOP candidate for Lt. Governor in Pennsylvania in 2006.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YES, I ENJOY MICHAEL MOORE AND
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 4, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only watched this to see him. Chis Matthews would fit better in the old Soviet Union. He knows the party line and he hews to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]