Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Former Surgeon General Was Muzzled, Censored by the Bush Administration

Posted by Guest Blogger at 5:58 AM on July 11, 2007.


Amanda Terkel: In testimony before the House Oversight Committee, former Surgeon General Richard Carmona explains how he was silenced on subjects like contraception and stem cell research.
Former Surgeon General Richard Carmona

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This post, written by Amanda Terkel, originally appeared on Think Progress

Richard Carmona served as President Bush's first Surgeon General from 2002-2006. Today he spoke before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and revealed that political appointees in the Bush administration muzzled him on key issues such as "stem cell research, contraceptives and his misgivings about the administration's embrace of 'abstinence-only' sex education":

[A]lthough most Americans believe that their Surgeon General has the ability to impact the course of public health as "the nation's doctor," the reality is that the nation's doctor has been marginalized and relegated to a position with no independent budget, and with supervisors who are political appointees with partisan agendas. Anything that doesn't fit into the political appointees' ideological, theological, or political agenda is ignored, marginalized, or simply buried.

Watch it part of Carmona's testimony in the video to your right.

Carmona revealed that when he tried to explain the science of stem cell research to the American public, he was "blocked at every turn, told a decision had already been made, stand down, don't talk about it." Additionally, political appointees were specifically assigned to "vet his speeches" and "spin [his] words in such a way that would be preferable to a political or ideologically pre-conceived notion that had nothing to do with science." He was also barred from speaking freely to reporters.

The politicization of "America's doctor" fits with broader White House efforts to politicize faith-based initiatives, global warming, contraceptives, and the Justice Department.

On Thursday, the Senate will consider the nomination of Dr. James Holsinger to be the next Surgeon General. Perhaps not surprisingly, Bush has this time nominated someone who has repeatedly put ideology over sound science, peddling views of homosexuality that have been rejected by the medical community.

The Gavel has more.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush administration, surgeon general, carmona

Amanda Terkel is Associate Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Bush's White House Spying on Iraqi Prime Minister
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino wants to make it clear, the White House IS NOT denying spying on Maliki.
Post by Amanda. September 5, 2008.
GOP Vetting Emporium and Taco Stand
Come for the vetting, stay for the tacos!
Post by Brave New Films. September 5, 2008.
The “P” in “POW” Does Not Stand for “President”
McCain is hellbent on playing the POW card to the bitter end.
Post by ZP Heller. September 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
MUZZLED ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 11, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He should be ashamed to admit that. We've had six years of people keeping their mouths shut. Is that one of the job requirements? Strange how they all chose to come clean at about the same time. Sorry , I'm not buying it. This sudden mass confession on all levels is nothing more than jumping ship. It's too late. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MUZZLED ? Posted by: JSquercia
Yes, muzzled, and gamed data for political reasons
Posted by: jiclemens on Jul 11, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was under the impression The Union Of Concerned Scientists originally formed for this reason. What is distressing is even they seem to have strayed from their original mission. Under pressure? Rather than outing the administration's scientific revisionist atrocities they look and act more like the Sierra Club now. No problem with SC, but we don't need two. No doubt publicity comes with investigations and job loss, and after the Plame case, no doubt careers/lives/families get ruined and sources have dried up. Even more distressing is a few eager lawyers can practically bring down a president over a blow-job and we're helpless with the criminals in office now. It is such an outrage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing New
Posted by: fg on Jul 11, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is nothing new for GOP politics: business above the health of ordinary citizens. Think of how the air pollution in NYC and environs was handled after 9-11.

When Bush Sr. was in office, the EPA produced a draft document on the health effects of low-level electric and magnetic fields. The draft identified such as probable (I seem to remember that "probable" was the word used) human carcinogens. The Bush Sr. "science" people (lawyers all, I seem to recall) made the EPA delete this fact from the final document. Bad for business you know.

Imagine: the White House meddling in science. It's a disgrace. I agree. W and his circus intimus should gracefully resign at this juncture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Serious Trouble
Posted by: Shey on Jul 11, 2007 4:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country is in serious trouble. We have to get the fascists who call themselves Republicans out of power before we are totally crushed and what's left of our democracy collapses under the weight of their plutocratic dictatorship. We need to swallow our cynicism, no matter how well founded, and get out and vote for progressive candidates who have a chance of winning.
Join progressive organizations, actively support liberal candidates, and stop shying away from the very word "liberal" while we're at it.
Even if all you can do is sign up for information online from activist organizations that will keep you informed about problems and pending legislation, sign their petitions, make calls to your congressional representatives regarding pending legislation, do that.
The worst thing we can do is nothing. And it's tempting to do nothing, because it seems so hopeless to those of us who basically have no money and no power. But we still have numbers, and if we use our voices and let our elected representatives and candidates know that we're aware of how bad it is and that they have our backing, that we expect them to fight for the rights we're constantly losing rather than compromise even more of them away, that's certainly better than sitting in front of the TV and bitching because we know that most mainstream news is a pack of lies and we're being brainwashed by commercials (there's this thing called a "mute" button).
"The truth will set you free". But only if you keep speaking it, over and over again, no matter how many times it takes. That is, after all, one of the main tactics employed by the fascists now in power .... keep saying the same thing over and over until people believe it, even if it's a bold faced lie. How much more effective will that tactic be when it's the truth you're speaking? We really are running out of time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]