Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Right-Wingers to Hollywood: We Want More Racist Stereotypes! [VIDEO]

Posted by Joshua Holland at 12:19 PM on July 10, 2007.


How about some dancing minstrels in black face?
reelbadarabs

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

The latest wing-nut lament is that Hollywood simply refuses to indulge in racial stereotyping, or at least not enough of it given that we're engaged in a multi-front War on Scary Brown People Terror.

Roy at Alicublog has been cataloguing the madness, here and here. The target of opportunity for this latest battle in the right's KulturKampf is the new Die Hard movie, which, according to the plenty-plaint, fails to reinforce the central assumptions about the Islamic world that have guided our response, and the right's night-sweats, since 9/11: that all towelheads are the same, and, of course, all (or at least most) are terrorists.

According to a profoundly stupid offering by Reihan Salam writing at Slate, the problem is that Hollywood is just unwilling to portray Muslims as bad guys!

The threat of al-Qaida terrorist attacks is currently scaring America stiff. But you'd be hard-pressed to find Muslim terrorists in any of today's blockbuster action movies, which instead offer such uncontroversial bad guys as killer aliens and abusive husbands. Why is Hollywood shying away from al-Qaida-like villains?

Why indeed?

Michael Fumento wonders the same thing. He wants Hollywood to return to a time when filmmakers and government propagandists worked hand-in-hand to develop tidy racial stereotypes that helped people distinguish the good guys from the bad guys and made sure Americans' hatred was directed at the correct ethnic minority.

What got Fumento's dander up specifically was that the producers of the new Die Hard flick apparently portrayed someone who looked vaguely like an Arab as something other than a terrorist. I'm not making that up:

…one of the few good guys in the movie, the head of the FBI team that aids our hero John McClane, looks decidedly Arabic. Indeed, he played an Arab in an earlier movie.

Got that? He's looks like an Ay-Rab -- even played an Arab in an earlier movie -- and now some evil, Terror-Symp casting director hired that very same actor to play a good guy! Folks, if you ever needed proof that Hollywood hates America, there it is.

There are all kinds of appropriate responses to this line of nonsense. Roy hits most of them. But the bottom line is that these gripes are not only based on a false premise, they are based on a premise that is the diametric opposite of reality.

That is, Hollywood has long portrayed Arabs as shifty, murderous, hyper-sexualized sub-humans; they've done as good a job portraying them as depraved, as purely evil, as they ever did vilifying any other group during any other war. The only difference is that they've been at it for a very long time.

Fumento writes, "If I'm mistaken and there have been movies in which Islamists where the bad guys, please let me know. (If so, I'll bet they went straight to video.)"

Click on the clip to your right. It's a montage of Arabs -- in the movies "Arabs" and "Muslims" are pretty much interchangeable -- being portrayed as they usually are: as bad guys -- sex-fiends and buffoons who are good for nothing but being cut down in a fusillade of bullets by some proud and heroic American.

Update: Annalee Newitz points out that the bad guy in Tranformers is played by John Turturro. Whether he looks sufficently Arabic for Fumento and his fellolw goofballs remains to be seen.

Here's a bonus, a trailer from the film Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies A People

Digg!

Tagged as: hollywood, islamophobia, wing-nuts

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Hilarious Behind-the-Scenes Look at O'Reilly's Meltdown
A must-see mashup featuring O'Reilly's producer.
Post by ZP Heller. May 16, 2008.
Chris Matthews Gives Right-Wing Radio Host a Smackdown
Kevin James gets a much needed history lesson.
Post by Brave New Films. May 16, 2008.
EXPOSED: McCain a Complete Hypocrite on Hamas!
McCain was for talking to Hamas before he was against it.
Post by Huffington Post. May 16, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Is This for Real?
Posted by: pcushniesr on Jul 10, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’m a little stunned. No, maybe a _lot_ stunned. I really thought there wasn’t much left that could surprise me, but here it is: Right wingers lamenting the lack of Middle Eastern stereotypes in film. I followed some the links in the article and could feel my eyeslids stretching and my jaw dropping as I read. Is this for real, I asked myself? What these right-wingers don’t seem to realize (well, there’s a great deal they don’t realize, but I’ll try to avoid tangents here) is that they are reinforcing their _own_ stereotype as ravening, drooling, hate mongers who can’t see that our greatest terrorist threat is ensconced right here in the goddamned White House! _I’d_ like to know why Hollywood hasn’t made any movies dealing heavily with the present-day organized crime in our own government!

Listen, I’m an atheist and I have absolutely no use for religion. I consider religion to be one of the greatest evils that humanity ever visited on itself. But, at the same time, even I know that not everybody who participates in a religion is evil and wants to dominate the world, just as I know that not every right-winger wants to see Hollywood go back to making the dumb propaganda movies of WW II. Give me a modern war film such as Sam Peckinpah’s “The Iron Cross” or Eastwood’s “Letters from Iwo Jima” anytime.

Sheesh! I’ll be fuming about this for weeks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hollywood stereotyping Arabs and Muslims? Big surprise though, I guess,
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jul 10, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is much better than their like do in Isreal. At least these are only depictions of violence and not actual disenfranchisement, apartheid, and violence against Arabs. Keep in mind that Hollywood loved promoting stereotypes of 'lazy' 'superstitious' (but 'happy')blacks, the 'wily' and 'sinister' Oriental (usually bent on world domination), the 'inscrutable' Asian detective (on our side but never really understood by us Westerners), the evil Germans (also bent on world domination), etc. And who can forget that no decent Hollywood movie is complete without a "wide-eyed" black with a big surprise on his face during a car-chase or, better yet, when "spooked" by ghosts that the white heroes know is not real. Yes, the Mayers, Goldwyns, Fox, Warner brothers, etc all were for promoting stereotypes of a certain type. After all these groups are less worthy, in their minds, than the stupid goyim who were buying the movie tickets.
ps: don't forget all those who make big money in the pornography industry that makes huge profits in stereotypes of ethnicity and exploitation of women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you dumb? Posted by: ateo
. power of the stereotype
Posted by: aurora2484 on Jul 10, 2007 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The power of the stereotype is such that many accept the myths, without ever questioning more deeply. Even when faced with overwhelming evidence that what they have been taught is, in many ways, impossible.

human voices

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slate and the Oriental Other
Posted by: lotus23 on Jul 10, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to a profoundly stupid offering by Reihan Salam writing at Slate, the problem is that Hollywood is just unwilling to portray Muslims as bad guys!

Well that's not surprising, given that Slate's ideological slant is roughly the same as The New Republic, whose writer Michael Kinsley founded the web-zine.

While both are fairly liberal on social issues, their foreign policy is differs little from the neocons, is stridently pro-Israel (to the point of excoriating the "new historians"), and is generally invidious towards Arabs and Muslims, of which it views (at best) with the Orientalist fascination with the Other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, but...
Posted by: codiferous on Jul 10, 2007 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there violence perpetrated by Arabs? Yes. Are there some truths to these stereotypes? Yes. I think what the good Dr. is bemoaning is the lack of a similar portrayal of Western empirical attitudes towards the rest of the world. Good or bad, stereotypes serve a purpose as shorthand to describe how we see others who are different from us. This does not excuse that behavior or condone the stereotype but it is naive to expect that the conqueror will reveal the conquered in a favorable light. Perhaps if Islam comes to dominate the world we will be asking ourselves the same questions about the stereotypes that portray the West as greedy, ravenous for blood based on capitalistic ideas... and how shall we judge then?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, Joshua
Posted by: opeluboy on Jul 10, 2007 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we all know what would happen if someone made a film in which Jews were stereotyped.

Well, actually, the film wouldn't get made.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you know how politically correct the media is?
Posted by: ateo on Jul 10, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to launch into a liberal bias rant here but Hollywood clearly has an agenda and clearly has a left bias.

There are no Arab villains for the same reason there are very few black villains - it isn't politically correct.

So we have these supposed East German terrorists throughout the Die Hard series. The Nazi's are always a good villain for Hollywood.

Seriously, the messages coming out of Hollywood have been consistent for years and they are all very much Leftist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The messages are all there Posted by: phatkhat
» Nice response, ateo Posted by: HeroesAll
» Tinfoil hat Posted by: Joshua Holland
Once again
Posted by: Mojoe on Jul 11, 2007 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet puts a piece of fluff-politics in their videos.

War in Iraq
Economy
Energy Crisis

and alternet wants to talk about...

"Oh, these right-wingers are so racist towards the Arabs!"

I'm pretty sure Bill Maher was the one who refered to "selling the ports to the Arabs," as one of the President's failures."

Everyone stereotypes Arabs to degree. Everyone stereotypes blacks to a degree. And, I shit you not, everyone stereotypes whites to a degree.

Alternet would like you to think that only conservatives stereotype.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Once again Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: Once again Posted by: Mojoe
a few things
Posted by: dannrusso on Jul 11, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. It is difficult to have a movie without an antagonist. I am not suggesting that we always use Arabs as enemies, in fact, just the opposite, but in 1985 when Back To The Future was made, there was in fact an enemy (whether actual or not) in Qadafi (I know I spelled that wrong) and therefore when the Doc had to get the plutonium for the Delorean to become a time machine (I'm not sure I believe I'm writing this) of course he went to someplace who at the time, whether in Ronald Reagan's head or in actuality, was an enemy of the US.

2. How many Americans who are around 50-60 years old are even aware that the debonair lead of one of the greatest most romantic movies of all time (Dr Zhivago) is an Arab? Omar Sharif is an amazing actor who has played many different roles, good guys and bad guys, and seemingly has never shied away from his Arab-ness. Or for instance, Tony Shaloub has never not been Lebanese...maybe what Hollywood needs is more actors who are from the "enemy" ethnicity until the racism just dissapears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Verily I asketh thee, did not Homer Simpson
Posted by: po cracka on Jul 11, 2007 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
proclaim, "Screw you" to two scimitar wielding Arabs when denied permission to walk through Turkmenistan (311_S14E20_EABF15_brake my wife please)? What about Borat from Kazakhstan? Is it only funny when "we" perpetuate stereotypes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]