Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Abu Ghraib: "The President Had to be Aware of This" [VIDEO]

Posted by Adam Howard at 7:48 PM on June 17, 2007.


Seymour Hersh talks about his new article on Gen. Antonio Taguba, Donald Rumsfeld's dishonesty and the Abu Ghraib investigation.
Abu Ghraib:

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Try to ignore for a few minutes what a crappy interviewer Wolf Blitzer is and check out Seymour Hersh taking on the Bush Administration once again on this Abu Ghraib saga. The results of the investigation or lack thereof have never set well with me or many other Americans. In a new article Hersh tackles Rumsfeld's deceitfulness and Bush's possible responsibility for the torture at Abu Ghraib. Click on the video to your right for more.

Digg!

Tagged as: hersh, abu ghraib, taguba

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A man to whom one should pay attention.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 17, 2007 10:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He as enough credentials and people against him (Kennedy clan most famously) that his work seems to bear truth. Recall that Hersh was one of the first journalists to break the news about JFK's bigamist marriage and mob ties- (Hersh apparently claims that JFK was married to Durie Malcolm and the marriage was never properly annulled prior to his other marriage and that JFK had long standing mob ties relationship with mobster "The Cigar" Giancana. In addition, Hersh broke the news about how Clinton bombed the aspirin factory in Sudan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wolf (corporatized)Blitzer
Posted by: freedom on Jun 18, 2007 2:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the interview Blitzer doesn’t appear as concerned about the cover-up and career-ending lid put on Gen Taguba, or the atrocities at Abu Ghraib as he is about Hersh’s article, saying that the article itself is “disturbing”. Put that way, he makes the problem the fault of Hersh’s journalism. Blitzer and others are always putting a subtle twist to things.

Robert Lightfoot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was pranks and nothing more.
Posted by: kbest on Jun 18, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lyndie England had a penchant for taking nude photos of herself and her Sgt. boyfriend. Because of a lack of supervision by the commander of Abu Ghraib, Gen. Janis Karpinsky, this resulted in the pictures that came about.

Nothing more, nothing less. End of story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It was bestial pranks and nothing more? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Why does the Bush Regime support horrors?
Posted by: citizenjoe on Jun 18, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why does the Bush Regime support such horrors? The answer is pure racism-- to teach the inferior Arab races to obey the superior breed of human being, the American. Just as with the Nazis, this regime acts as if inferiors can murdered and tortured because they are not fully human beings. How would you explain it?-- Joe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BUSH IS THE DECIDER...OF COURSE HE KNEW!
Posted by: thetruth07 on Jun 18, 2007 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An excerpt from the book Blackwater-The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army by Jeremy Scahill.
In September 200, just months before its members would form the core of the Bush White House, the Project for a New American Century released a report called Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century. In laying out PNAC's vision for overhauling the US war machine, the report recognized that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." A year to the month later, the 9/11 attacks would provide the catalyst: an unprecedented justification to forge ahead with this radical agenda molded by a small cadre of neoconservative operatives who had just taken official power.
The often-overlook subplot of the wars of the post 9/11 period is the outsourcing and privatization they have entailed. From the moment the Bush team took power, the Pentagon was stacked with:
THE IDEOLOGUES:
Paul Wolfowitz
Douglas Feith
Zalmay Khalilzad
Stephen Cambone
FORMER CORPORATE EXECUTIVES:
Under Secretary of Defense Pete Aldridge (Aerospace Corporation)
Army Secretary Thomas White (Enron)
Navy Secretary Gordon England (General Dynamics)
Air Force Secretary James Roche (Northrop Grumman)
The new civilian leadership at the Pentagon came into power with two major goals: regime change in strategic nations and the enactment of the most sweeping privatization and outsourcing operation in the US military history - a revolution in military affairs. After 9/11 this campaign became unstoppable.
The Commander in Chief is responsible for everything that happens on his watch. Just as a Captain of a ship in the US Navy is relieved of his command when something happens on his watch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]