Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Olbermann does Attorneygate [VIDEO x 2]

Posted by Richard Blair at 8:35 AM on March 27, 2007.


Richard Blair: The last 12 hours have been full of new twists & turns...
agolb1
ag2

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Let's just recap quickly, as there have been quite a few interesting developments over the past 12 hours:

1. Monica Goodling of A.G. Gonzales' staff has lawyered up, and her attorney (John Dowd, of Pete Rose and John McCain / Keating S&L scandal fame) fired off a lengthy letter to whoever in congress would read it, stating that she will invoke her 5th amendment right not to testify before a congressional committee. There's a whole lot of nuance to this piece of the story, but suffice it to say that Goodling's way out on a limb with her invocation of the 5th. And Dowd's on very shaky legal ground. Conventional wisdom: Dowd's letter is fishing for an immunity deal for Goodling from Sen. Pat Leahy.

2. Alberto Gonzales did an appearance on NBC last night, with Bush 41 sidekick Pete Williams conducting the interview - and gawd, if Abu Al came off that bad with a supporter and journalistic enabler like Williams, what will actually happen when someone in congress is tossing him some hardball questions - under oath? Keith Olbermann did a "must see" segment [VIDEO upper right] on AttorneyGate yesterday evening. Conventional wisdom: Gonzales is as incompetent as he appears to be (a hallmark of most Bush regime appointees).

3. The White House is apparently...

... selectively leaking emails that it won't disclose to congress under claims of "executive privilege". In doing so, another DOJ underling - Assistant Attorney General Paul McNulty - is being thrown under a bus. How many more sheep in the justice department will be thrown under the bus before one of them really starts to squeal? I guess the Bush regime learns nothing from history (re: Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre). Conventional Wisdom: The hail mary passes are starting, and the whole case is devolving quickly. By selectively leaking previously undisclosed emails, the White House is damaging its executive privilege claims. The lawyers in the regime know the jig is up. And they know what's really at stake - their own professional careers (and perhaps freedom from jail time).

4. Hammerin' Hank Waxman has written letters to the RNC (and copied everyone in the world) directing that the RNC and its email service provider are to preserve all internet email correspondence on private email domains of the RNC. Waxman believes that there has been correspondence on RNC email domains regarding executive branch operational decisions that should have been limited exclusively to government email domains (eop.gov, anyone?). Conventional Wisdom: This could be explosive - and will most certainly set up yet another constitutional showdown between the executive branch and congress.


If I were a betting man, last Wednesday I would have placed a large wager on Gonzales having resigned by Friday due to internal pressure from the leadership of the Republican Party (and I'm not necessarily speaking about elected officials). He is hanging on by the barest of threads. This is not playing well for the GOP, and the elected representatives in congress (both Senate and House) have to be able to read the handwriting on the wall. Polling just released by USAToday is clearly indicating that a vast majority of the public favors further investigation by congress. There is a general election approaching next year, and the longer this drags out, the worse it's going to be for the Republican Party. It's already bad - but unless they can get Alberto Gonzales off of the front page very quickly, this is just going to keep festering and festering. More importantly, I now know in my heart of hearts that this scandal goes all the way to the top. If George Bush was not intimately involved in the entire proceeding, Goodling (the designated runner between DOJ and the White House) would not be invoking the fifth. If he were not intimately involved in attempts to obstruct justice (San Diego) and tamper with elections (New Mexico), the coverup and denials simply wouldn't be this strong. And let's not forget that these are arguably among the least egregious potential crimes committed by the Bush regime.

My prediction: the investigations won't stop with Gonzales, even when Bush reluctantly lets Abu Al fall on his own sword (and mark my words, it will happen, sooner than later). When all is said and done, and when we look back at this scandal from a historical perspective, I think we'll all be a bit surprised that, after all of the other malfeasance the Bush regime was involved in, AttorneyGate was the straw that broke the camel's back. I guess you go to impeachment with the scandal you have, not the scandal you might like to prosecute…

Digg!

Tagged as: olbermann, alberto gonzales, prosecutorgate

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Define the prize
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 27, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blair: "The lawyers in the regime know the jig is up. And they know what's really at stake - their own professional careers..."

For all you impeachment-addicts out there, this sentence is actually at the heart of why impeachment is a bad strategy.

These are the lawyers with intimate knowledge of the President's Signing Statements. And the inner-core meetings of highest level officials - where they discussed how they would get around laws enacted by Congress and which K Street lobbyist paid for a loophole - should be the Holy Grail for Congressional investigators.

Start impeachment proceedings, and every lawyer with intimate knowledge of the Signing Statements will be silenced by the President's impeachment defence team. They'll hide behind the 5th and it will take decades to get them to talk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Define the prize Posted by: Liberalandproudofit
» RE: Define the prize Posted by: eddie torres
» Whatever Posted by:
I Agree - Forget About Impeachment - But Keep Giving Bush Hell
Posted by: ZPaul on Mar 27, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Give Bush Hell. Give him and his Corrupt Administration HELL -- and don´t let up, until we´re rid of him. That´s what I think we should do. I realize it´s too late for impeachment. And if we survive this one, America: NEVER AGAIN. I think you all know what I mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pandora's box
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Mar 27, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems George and Co. have out smarted themselves again. So quick to lie about everything. If George had come out and said we fired them because I said so, this would not be the problem it is now. He could have said he wanted a few new people and leave it at that. Since he has surrounded himself with incompetents who do not think the law applies to them,Pandora's box is opening wider and wider. They believe they are beyond the law. George is so eager to duck accountability he tells lies, when the truth would do. You should not keep pissing off the legal profession. This reminds me of the Watergate break in, that started so small and later took down a president because of the same kind of arrogance of power. Congress is trying to get straight answers but the Bush team can not shoot straight. Every republican who loses their seat next election should thank Karl Rove the spin mister. Evidently republicans cannot handle power and credibility at the same time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sad
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 27, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The saddest part of all of this is that most people will not pay much attention to it... because it is moderately complex most people will likely be utterly lost on what actually has gone on very quickly... and far too many are likely to buy the simple pablum that Bush is putting out.. that is also a pattent lie.. that this is all just partisan politics. They may also buy that the white house is juvenille enough to actually be doing this dance to avoid congress in any way they can out of some dedication to principle.. rather than the true reason, which is their utter corruption and allergy to telling the truth openly.

If people realized on a broad scale what was going on here and what the Bush administration has actually done and is continuing to do it would truly be the bright shining star set atop this traitorous christmas tree of deception, fabrication, dishonesty, visciousness, petty animosity, and bullying that we call, because calling it what it truly is... a bloody and monstrous farce.. a black comic joke on the world that not even the most twisted of souls can truly find much humor in, a presidency. It is not the severity of what has gone on here that is the problem. No law was actually broken in this firing based on what we know so far. It is the scope of the dishonesty that is being revealed with justice department officials and staffers scattering like teenagers at a house party thats just been busted by the police, each hoping not to be the one caught and questioned knowing that no answer will be the right one, any answer will bring about more trouble, the truth will likely eventually come out, but being the one to tell the truth is likely to get the hammer dropped on you hardest of all by both adults and the spoiled, angry party goers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes it takes only a small break
Posted by: CJC on Mar 27, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either the president has something more serious to hide than most of us are imagining with the firing of the US attorneys, or the administration ran out of fingers to put in the dikes, or they completely miscalculated.

In any case, this may be the little crack in the foundation that will bring the whole edifice down. It is reminiscent of the Watergate break-in.

It seems that it was a big mistake for Bush to promote Gonzales to a big public post with responsibility for the whole federal legal system. He should have kept Gonzales in the White House where we wouldn't really know how incompetent or unprincipaled he was.

As AG he's out there in the public glare and no one can protect him. He doesn't even seem to have the presence of mind to check his calendar and emails to make sure that he doesn't say really stupid things like, "I can't know everything that's going on in a big department" when he was present at a meeting just a few months ago. The parts of his interview with Pete Williams that I saw were incoherent. Strange.

We're all keeping tuned for further developments!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The REALLY important stuff,,,
Posted by: John Rice on Mar 27, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
,,,might not even be discussed yet.

So far, the problems are centered around the 7% of the DOJ hirelings who didn't obey partisan orders or suggestions, and were fired as a result of it.

Given when most of these miscreants were hired by the Bush administration, what I'm interested in are the 93% of those hired who DID do what was asked of them, and as a result of their 'fidelity' to their boss instead of the Constitution, didn't investigate such things as: what really did happen during and after 9-11, the illegalities of going to war against Afghanistan and Iraq, and the under-investigated voter fraud issues of 2000 and every election since then.

The Bush administration is fighting so hard about this because those who have acted illegally are literally fighting for their freedom and perhaps even their lives.

The reason? There is no statute of limitations for any (president's) war crimes, and that is also why the Dems will ultimately let the Reps get away with it--both Bushes and Clinton would all get convicted for war crimes, if for nothing more than having intentionally chosen to contaminate the world (forever more) with depleted uranium munitions. And on many different levels, that is a war crime.

Regards,,,John
( john_rice@neitherparty.org )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gonzalez sounds gay and it ain't his accent.
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 27, 2007 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have nothing against gays but the RWA (Right-Wing Assholes, a redundant description) certainly does, and if Abu Al does turn out gay it would further handicap the Bushit "administration." The less they are able to do, the less evil they are able to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank67
Posted by: frank67 on Mar 27, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Utterly incompetent regime. These fools make Warren Harding look like a magnificent statesman. SA Karl Rove is not as smart as the average armadillo. The Bushies are BS, period. I am sick of these chickenhawks sending the young off to be killed and maimed. Lest we forget, old five deferment Cheney; the ultimate draft dodger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only thing I can say is......
Posted by: spacestevie on Mar 27, 2007 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Evil said in Time Bandits...

"Dear sweet Benson. You are so mercifuly free from the ravages of Intellegence."

You have to wonder what these guys are thinking. The sad fact of the matter is that we are stuck with these guys till the next election. They have all that time to further run the country into the ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK Republicans....
Posted by: NeilDeal on Mar 27, 2007 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the love of God could you fess up and just admit that this administration has some major issues? What is going on in their heads that makes all of this acceptable?

Come on already!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not to mention the Texas Boys' Penal System Pedo Coverup...
Posted by: xbj on Mar 28, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google it... it's all over the alternate internet press.

Gonzales has been toast since last week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Bush holds onto Gonzales
Posted by: xbj on Mar 28, 2007 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How hard do you think it would have been for Hitler to find a lawyer that would actually TRY to get him off?

(And no, that's not meant to be a pun, although...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Doin' a heckuva job, Gonzo"
Posted by: xbj on Mar 28, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I figured it out... Bush knows he's the biggest f*ckup in the history of the world, he knows he's one of the biggest idiots the planet has ever produced, and he's the President of the most powerful Empire and Commander of the Greatest Military the world has ever seen yet, right? So he PURPOSELY picks idiots and screwups for any official whose job it is to TRULY benefit the people, like Attorney General, or head of FEMA, or anyone whose job it is to protect and serve the People of the US or Protect and Defend the Constitution like Attorney General, and then picks the Svengali's and Machiavelli's and Rasputin's for any job that requires screwing over the People of the US and the World, like Vice President (Ministry of Lies and Offense Plunder), Secretary of Defense ('nuff said), Chief Political Advisor (Rove and his Ministry of Propoganda) and Secretary of State.

So that's the Bush strategy, and you'd better believe the history books are going to show it. That's his legacy, his management "style", the pinnacle of "the Peter Principle" brought to horrific life, with a mad King and his henchmen with their fingers on the nuclear suicide button when everything starts falling around them and ON them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Doin' a heckuva job, Gonzo" Posted by: blitzmesser
"...the straw that broke the camel's back"? ? ?
Posted by: Voicedude on Mar 28, 2007 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...when we look back at this scandal from a historical perspective, I think we'll all be a bit surprised that, after all of the other malfeasance the Bush regime was involved in, AttorneyGate was the straw that broke the camel's back."

Just like the treatment of Cindy Sheehan would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like 2004 voter fraud and irregularities would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like Valerie Plame-gate would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like the Downing Street Memo would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like Abu Ghraib would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like the Haditha massacre would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Just like Katrina would be the straw that broke the camel's back....

Oh, my Lord! When does it all end? January 20, 2009 is NOT SOON ENOUGH! What does it take before we actually do something about all this? Is impeachment truly 'off the table'? Are these merely rhetorical questions?

And, the BIG question: will THE WORLD wait that long? If al queda's response for our past sins took until 9/11/01 to retaliate, what giant shi'ite-storm awaits us in the future? I pray every day for the future of our country, and I fear that whatever actions we may take to remove these arrogant terrorists in charge of OUR country may be too little, too late...

I know THIS for sure:
The Dems better find a REAL candidate, and SOON!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the defeat o crats fail again and again and again
Posted by: wleming on Mar 28, 2007 4:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bush is on the run with the lowest polls of any prez ever, thats any american president; the war in iraq is lost; his attorney general a liar; his regime in dissary; his credibility in his own party now plummeting; and the Defeatocrats can't find a way to impeach him. thanks nancy pelosi for shooting us All in the foot... again and again.
more evidence that we need a third party.
oh and al gore has rebranded and says nothing beyond
save the dolphins, when he means: save al gore.. something
al gore could not do.
who needs a democratic party that defends its enemies and betrays its friends. wl

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]