Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Burn these Republican words into your mind

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 1:35 PM on December 11, 2006.


Ike's farewell...
ike

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

On January 17, 1961, Dwight D. Eisenhower said goodbye to public office with an address that concluded with the words below [strangely, the Eisenhower Library's version and the audio in the video to the right, differ slightly. Brackets represent the text in the Library version omitted from the audio file...].

You're familiar with the warnings in this speech against the "military-industrial complex," but the subtler parts of the speech are every bit as powerful and refreshing...

As we peer into society's future, we - you and I, and our government - must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without asking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

During the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

[Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.]

[Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative.] Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war - as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years - I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

So - in this my last good night to you as your President - I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I, my fellow citizens, need to be strong in our faith, that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace, with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, eisenhower

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Honduras Crisis Forces Obama to Focus on Latin America
Will Obama side with a democratically elected government that happens to be a Venezuelan ally?
Post by Tom Hayden. July 1, 2009.
Fox News Urges Viewers to Keep on Tea Baggin' on July 4th (VIDEO)
No, we won't EVER get tired of that double-entendre!
Post by Lee Fang. June 30, 2009.
Katie Couric, Tavis Smiley, Bob Woodward, Nicholas Kristof, and I Hit YouTube with Pointers for Citizen Journalists
Become The Huffington Post's 'Eyes and Ears.'
Post by Arianna Huffington. June 30, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's too bad Eisenhower didn't take his own advice
Posted by: timebomb734 on Dec 11, 2006 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Near the end of Truman's administration, the British approached President Truman to help take down Iran's PM Mossadegh, who was attempting to nationalize the private oil industry ran by the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Fortunately, Truman decided against such an action. However, when Eisenhower took office the Brits asked again, and were met with assistance from the CIA. American agents ousted Mossadegh from power and reinstated the shah, one of the cruelest leaders of the 20th century. Three cheers for Ike for allowing the greatest of freedom and oppurtunity to all people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» amacd #3 quite right Posted by: larry278
The Military, Industrial, Congressional Complex
Posted by: shangrilalad on Dec 12, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many Americans know of Ike’s warning about the Military-Industrial Complex, but it remains a nameless, faceless and abstract entity in the minds of most people. For a clearer explanation of the concept, it should be called the Military, Industrial, Congressional Complex. The concept becomes clearers still when we realize that it is a jointly owned and controlled economic enterprise shared by politicians and corporations, and not just American politicians and corporations. It is also an Internationally owned and controlled enterprise with many foreign fingers in the pie.

Many of the companies with a finger in the pie are publicly owned corporations but others are privately owned. Most of these companies are owned and controlled by American allies, but some are not. Our new Global Economy is so mixed, it’s hard to know who owns what anymore. But in any event, we would be wise to acknowledge that foreign politicians and investors may not necessarily have America’s best interests at heart. They are all seeking profit, but at who’s expense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 12, 2006 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No person hates war more than a soldier that has been combat up close and personal. Not the folks ion the rear with the gear- the front line troops.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Was it ever? Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» wasn't Ike's fault Posted by: medstudgeek
Susan C
Posted by: SusanC on Dec 12, 2006 12:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another US President wrote some words worth recalling. George H. W. Bush explained why he did not invade Iraq:

"In their cowritten 1998 book, "A World Transformed" George Bush the Elder
and Brent Scowcroft discussed regime change in Iraq:

Trying to eliminate Saddam [in 1991], extending the ground war into an
occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guidelines about not changing
objectives in midstream, engaging in 'mission creep,' and would have
incurred incalculable human and political costs . . .[We] Would have have
been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would
instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting in anger and other allies
pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable 'exit
strategy' we could see, violating another of our principles . . . Had we
gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an
occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a
dramatically different - and perhaps barren - outcome." (quoted in Losing
America, pg 154)

Source: Biography.ms via Google

Too bad for the world that Junior can't...or will not...read. Ironically he has proven his father 100% correct and left the entire world in the lurch as the result of the instability and chaos he has created across the entire Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Baby Bush Posted by: Artkansas
Gov't and Corps.
Posted by: bob t on Dec 12, 2006 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ikes words brought tears to my eyes, but then I remembered, if memory serves, that Ho Chi Minh asked Ike to intercede on behalf of the vietnamese with the French who were killing them and Ike refused. Shortly, Ike sent MAGS(military assistance groups) into Vietnam. Thus ended the French-Vietnam war and began the American-Vietnam war. The French lost their war and we lost the very same war. And so we lost 58,000 troops to death and how many are still living on the streets today. Do America's citizen soldiers deserve so much endless gov't stupidity and corporate greed that goes along with it. They lie, and 'we the people' die 'in order to form a more perfect union'. And that is why 'we the people must keep and ever watchful eye on our gov't and corporations. Not because we hate america as the Repubs and southerners claim but because we must insure that our troops are sent into harms way for only the best and real of reasons, not phony Republican crap or Democratic crap. And we must keep a watchful eye becuase we desire to 'form a more perfect union'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LHol
Posted by: LHol on Dec 14, 2006 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However inconsistent Eisenhower may have been, these were, for the most part, the sentiments of the American people. As such, they were -- and remain -- entirely consistent with American values and are a worthy set of goals for international relations today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rose colored
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Dec 16, 2006 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'They' do it, they're dirty rats, we do it, it's brilliant and noble. They are an evil empire, we are the greatest nation on earth, the greatest ever. Might makes right and we write the history books (for now).

We just had another great pastry debate, and it's our interests that still count the most. We own the world, and the rest of them are our servants or surplus labor waiting to take their place if they complain. And guess what? Many of us are in the same boat, just not the end that is already under water as it sinks. We're safe here on the back end of the Titanic.

I still haven't heard the new majority in congress swear off of money, and ordinary people are not about to sponsor any elections and couldn't if we wanted to. You can only assume they will reward their contributors. They may swear off of one kind of pork, but they won't stop serving everything else with plenty of gravy. Commerce regulates congress, and big money runs the show. If everyone sent money to candidates, it would merely raise the cost of campaigning.

Capitalism and competition, unregulated, mean that as soon as one gets away with something, the others have to do it too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is someone fixing the archived record?
Posted by: bjerko on Dec 16, 2006 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone needs to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]