Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Racist Republican senator?

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 3:01 PM on August 14, 2006.


'Macaca' is derogatory word for blacks and 'dark skinned people'...
George Allen, racist?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

George Allen, a Republican senator from Virginia (who consistently ranks high in polls of '08 republican presidential nominees) appears to have used a racial epithet in a recent speech to supporters [Video right].

The speech was being videotaped by a volunteer for Allen's opponent -- 20-year-old Indian-American S.R. Sidarth. The Washington Post writes: "During a campaign speech Friday in Breaks, Virginia, near the Kentucky border, Allen singled out Sidarth and called him a word that sounded like 'Macaca.'"

"This fellow here over here with the yellow shirt, Macaca, or whatever his name is... Lets give a welcome to Macaca, here. Welcome to America and the real world of Virginia."
The Webb campaign speculates that he may have meant "monkey" or a town in South Africa and others have connected it to the spanish word for excrement but I think it's just good old fashioned "wow, them funny foreign names is danged hard to pronounce"-style racism. A cheap shot by a loser. UPDATE: It looks like I may have given the senator the benefit of the doubt.

From Wikipedia:
The word, "Macaca," refers to a species of monkeys in the Eastern Hemisphere, and is alledged to be a prejudiced term used in Tunisia in reference to blacks and dark-skinned people. Allen's mother is from French Tunisia.
Sidarth, noting that the audience of Republicans was lily-white, speculated: "I think he was doing it because he could and I was the person of color there and it was useful for him in inciting his audience..."

Allen, it turns out, has a spotty history when it comes to, er, cultural sensitivity. According to Brendan Nyhan, he once hung a noose in his Virginia law office, a confederate flag at home, signed a "Confederate Heritage Month" proclamation, denounced the NAACP, opposed MLK Day, opposed the 1991 Civil Rights Act in Congress, opposed changing the offensive state song, defended Trent Lott and praised Strom Thurmond.

Allen has refused to apologize for his macac-omments. You do the math.

Digg!

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So, which Repubtard is NOT a racist?
Posted by: marklar on Aug 14, 2006 3:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There may be a few, Chafee, Collins, but seriously, there IS a reason that David Duke is a Republican, that white supremecy groups like the KKK, NRA, NeoNazis, skinheads, survivalists, and more, all vote Repubtard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So, which Repubtard is NOT a racist? Posted by: Coffeeinmybelly
» RE: So, which Repubtard is NOT a racist? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Neitherparty.org--I like that. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Neitherparty.org--I like that. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: So, which Repubtard is NOT a racist? Posted by: Coffeeinmybelly
» RE: So, which Repubtard is NOT a racist? Posted by: Coffeeinmybelly
David Duke...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 14, 2006 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was a state congressman from a backwater parish, and was defeated by the people of Louisiana, who took the high road and chose a very, very crooked democrat (Edwards) for governor, over a having a former Klansman holding statewide office. Lesser of two evils, as always in politics, right?

Wrong--unfortunately, we can't say that the people of West Virginia made the same choice, in returning (time and again) their former Klansman to the senate.

In my experience (not just the above example), republicans have the same capacity and perclivity for racist behavior as democrats. Regardless of their political stripes, such people should be exposed for what they are.

BTW, many of the hate groups you mentioned have their own parties. And, you may be shocked to find, that the idea of a free person in a free country owning a firearm is very, very liberal ideal. I forget, however, that democrats are no longer a party of liberal ideals; they just happen to be a tad less restrictive in adjusting our liberties for our own safety than the current beanheads in who hold political power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: David Duke... Posted by: realist
» RE: David Duke... Posted by: realist
» RE: David Duke... Posted by: ABetterFuture
sometimes it's out in the open and sometimes it isn't
Posted by: juno1957 on Aug 14, 2006 8:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racism is a major issue in these United States of America. It was a major issue in the motivations when our governments allowed New Orleans to drown. It is an issue in the Iraq War. We would not do what we are doing at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib if they were white/European/Anglo, but they're not white, they're Arabs. Racism is an issue in the underfunding of our education systems. It is an issue in the opposition to affirmative action. Racism has a tremendous impact on so many different areas of American life, it boggles the mind.

It's a shame to see that someone like this lowlife Neanderthal thinker Allen guy can get so far in politics, when his mindset is so backward, but then again, look at what we're stuck with in Rumsfeld, Cheney, and their ilk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

most people are racist, but...
Posted by: autonomie on Aug 15, 2006 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
most people are racist, regardless of party affiliation.

this guy in particular sure sounds a lot more dangerous, though. sounds like a fascist to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

many people are not racist
Posted by: robmikejas on Aug 15, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if most people are racist or not, but I do know many who are not...and they try to do what they can to change the racist climate that pervails in our political atmosphere today. Simple lessons in tolerance and love given in childhood might make the difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: many people are not racist Posted by: fauxfuture
I am not sure if he meant it in that way...
Posted by: Jesse on Aug 15, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Macaca" is not a term I have ever heard before, and I think this kind of racism is the "funny names" variety. He might just as well have blurted out "Ahmed" or something. I mean, I doubt this candidate is all that familiar with the language and/or culture of Eastern Africa--certainly not enough to blurt out a racist term unique to that culture. It would be like David Duke blurting out that we need to get rid of the haole or gaijin. Most people would be scratching their heads.

This in no way diminishes this guy's obvious distaste for non-whites. But let's give credit where credit is due.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you don't believe he could've known what he was saying
Posted by: Evan Derkacz on Aug 15, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reread the post more closely... particularly the part about his mother...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At least he is honest. Both Parties Are Racist.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Aug 15, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike the Democratic elite who live in all-white States or neighborhoods (or in the case of the Kerrys and Kennedys all-white compounds where rape and excessive drinking is all in a days fun). Remember Ms.Clinton claiming that "all Indians work in convenience stores." Or when Lieberman made the same "joke". What about Hollywood's "The Simpsons" where every Indian is a stereotyped? And every Democrat produced movie or music where every black person is a 'gangsta' or 'ho'? Frankly, I've never heard of this term "Malaca" and it seems a pretty bizarre ethnic comment if it was so. However, I guess, there are regional terms of disparagement I assume. So maybe its popular with the white people in his state. Both parties are racist due to their elistism. Oh, they can tolerate some token. ("He is so articulate". "She is sooo well spoken".) But they both are racist, elitist scum who will use race for their own aggrandisment (whether its 'fear of crime', 'affirmative action', 'welfare programs', 'law and order'). Democrats and Republicans are both the same party that serves the elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The South Posted by: Ouelle
» RE: The South Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: The South Posted by: ABetterFuture
Update: He's apologized
Posted by: neurorot on Aug 15, 2006 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But apparently, "the word Macaca had no derogatory meaning for him" . I'd never heard the word before this article, but hearing his moms is from a part of the world where the word IS used, his defense seems a little disengenuous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, couldn't get the text link to work
Posted by: neurorot on Aug 15, 2006 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is " US Senator apologises for remark against NRI", and it can be found at http://www.financialexpress.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Onewing
Posted by: Onewing on Aug 15, 2006 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After looking at the video a couple of times, I think he may just have been tipsy...
a'la Mel Gibson?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deliberately offensive
Posted by: alternetleslie on Aug 16, 2006 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After carefully listeming to the video, from 1)
the repetition of the word , 2) its clearness, 3) its emphasis, 4)the speaker directing his words to the young man, 5) together with the comment about the guy in the yellow shirt following him around video tapping for his opponent, 6) his opponent being Tunisian, and 7) the "educated smartness" in his attitude saying the word, I have come to the conclusion: the speaker had time for an aide to do some research to find something to customize an insult to the young man of color, and his boss. Probably his audience did not know what the word meant, but that didn't matter -- the intention was to insult the young man and his boss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wal-Mart Racist Update (they are republican)
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Aug 18, 2006 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew Young, the American civil rights leader who was hired by Wal- Mart Stores to improve its public image, has resigned from that post after telling an African-American newspaper that Jewish, Arab and Korean shop owners had "ripped off" urban communities for years, "selling us stale bread, and bad meat and wilted vegetables."

In the interview, published Thursday in The Los Angeles Sentinel, a weekly, Young said Wal-Mart should displace mom-and-pop stores in urban neighborhoods.

"You see those are the people who have been overcharging us," he said of the owners of the small stores, "and they sold out and moved to Florida. I think they've ripped off our communities enough. First it was Jews, then it was Koreans and now it's Arabs."

Young, 74, a former mayor of Atlanta and a former U.S. representative at the United Nations, apologized for the comments and retracted them in an interview late Thursday. Less than an hour later, he resigned as chairman of Working Families for Wal-Mart, a group created and financed by the company to trumpet its accomplishments.

"It's against everything I ever thought in my life," Young said. "It never should have been said. I was speaking in the context of Atlanta, and that does not work in New York or Los Angeles

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]