Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Dr. King Would Break the Silence on Afghanistan

Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Films at 10:43 AM on April 6, 2009.


The socioeconomic parallels between the Vietnam era and today.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

This week, my Get Afghanistan Right colleagues and I want you to flash back to 1967, when Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lashed out at the US government over the Vietnam War.  We remember Dr. King's speech, "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence," not just to raise parallels between Vietnam and Afghanistan, which are certainly growing with President Obama's mission creep calls for military escalation.  Dr. King's speech also illustrates how fighting a Long War abroad grossly depletes our government's wherewithal to handle (and our nation's ability to focus on) a more critical socioeconomic crisis at home.

Speaking at New York's Riverside Church, Dr. King made the connections between the Civil Rights movement and Vietnam for several reasons.  He couldn't advocate peaceful solutions to the rampant racial violence in America when our government stood as "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today."  He couldn't ignore the fact that White and Black could die side-by-side on the battlefields of Southeast Asia more easily than they could sit together at a lunch table back home.  But the primary reason Dr. King turned his attention to the war was because he saw it undermining President Johnson's ability to fight the "unconditional war on poverty."  How could LBJ's poverty program help the destitute at home when our government was channeling so much national attention and so many tax dollars and lives into military escalation abroad?

Here's Dr. King in his own prescient words:

There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor -- both black and white -- through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam and I watched the program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.

Now let's flash forward to the economic problems that persist today.  8 million American homeowners face foreclosure in the coming years, as a family enters foreclosure every 13 seconds.  The unemployment rate is at a 25-year high, jumping to 8.5 percent as employers cut payrolls by 663,000 jobs in March alone.  Our economy has lost 5.1 million jobs since this recession began in December 2007, and economists predict the hemorrhaging is far from over.  Meanwhile, employees who have managed to hang onto their jobs continue to feel the financial crunch, considering 1 of out 5 US workers is uninsured.

Yes, we have come a long, long way from the racial disparities and gross injustices of the Civil Rights era, thanks mainly to Dr. King's tireless efforts.  Last year, our nation made history by electing an African American President, one with a brilliant progressive agenda for lifting us out of our current economic turmoil.  And yet the Obama administration is jeopardizing the success of its bold plans for economic recovery by squandering hundreds of billions of dollars and all its political capital on the Afghanistan war.

We can't allow this war to become a "demonic destructive suction tube" on our already ailing economy.  Military operations in Afghanistan have already cost us $172 billion in taxpayer money, according to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.  That price tag could easily exceed half a trillion dollars when you factor in the costs of future occupation and veterans' benefits, and that's before we get into the added costs of military escalation.  Instead, we must invest in our own economic recovery and in fixing Afghanistan's humanitarian crisis.

To achieve these goals, it's time to break the silence on Afghanistan.  Join over 42,000 people who have signed the petition for congressional oversight hearings that can shed some light on the mounting economic costs of this war, and ensure that the administration and military agencies aren't wasting billions of taxpayer dollars.  Follow Peace Action West's lead and contact your representative to oppose military escalation.  Then, post your concerns about escalation in diaries at Oxdown Gazette.  As Dr. King said, "Somehow this madness must cease...The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours."

 

Digg!

Tagged as: vietnam, barack obama, martin luther king jr., afghanistan war

ZP Heller is the editorial director of Brave New Films. He has written for The American Prospect, AlterNet, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Huffington Post, covering everything from politics to pop culture.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When will somebody like ZP Heller break the silence on 9/11, the reason for the war?
Posted by: pfgetty on Apr 7, 2009 3:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if King would have been a bit more courageous than the journalists today, like ZP Heller, and actually come out with the truth about 9/11, which is the reason we are in Afghanistan in the first place.
Here we have ZP Heller talking about intellectual honest, but he is one of the hundreds or thousands of journalists who will not break the silence about all of the evidence and facts that we have that prove 9/11 was an inside job and has been covered up and censored by the msm and alternative media, like Alternet.
If Alternet would bring out those facts, we would certainly end the war in Afghanistan. The embarrassment and anger of the American people would bring it to a close quickly. But Alternet, and the rest of the media, have conspired to NEVER mention any of the worthy and respected and undisputable work of people like David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and Richard Gage.
Alternet has put hundreds of articles about WMD, "links", torture, the Patriot Act, the illegal wars and occupations, but not one in depth article, in all these almost eight years, about the contradictions and lies of 9/11. Doesn't that seem a bit odd to you? They will not tell us why, but there has obviously been repression and threats against all of these media sources.
Tell us, ZP Heller, WHY don't you bring it up? What a hero you would be.
You'd change the world.
Doesn't Alternet want that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU pfgetty Posted by: godsbreath64
» RE: THANK YOU pfgetty Posted by: pfgetty
King could not break silence. Bush & Co. broke up his skull.
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Apr 7, 2009 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it weren't in Memphis, it would be in the next town.

In an open fascism, they must rely on constituency. Nothing is more Pavlovian then the Klan's opportunity for on the books economic slavery and whoever provides such.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Militant Laissez-faire Kleptocrats
Posted by: jingles on Apr 7, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only MLK congress and white house ever listened to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Until this speech.....
Posted by: fearn on Apr 7, 2009 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MLK was an 'agitator' primarily concerned with domestic issues. When he spoke out about American foreign policy he went too far and was eliminated by more powerful forces.
It is tragic that in the American plutocracy the truth behind major events like 9/11, the assassination of men like MLK, RFK, JFK, and others is never revealed and this speech by MLK is not known as the speech that killed him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not his hero
Posted by: Erin on Apr 7, 2009 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since Obama is escalating the war, mercenaries, etc., I guess we would have to assume that MLK is not someone he looks up to or respects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]