Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Afghanistan II: the Sequel We (and the Afghans) Don't Need

Posted by DJK, Brave New Films at 12:00 PM on January 13, 2009.


Haven't we seen this movie before?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Haven't we seen this movie before?

It's the one where the US invades a country with the very best intentions. Where we are ignorant to or ignore the culture we are invading and assume that everyone will magically get along and want to be just like us when we stop bombing them. Where we think we'll be seen as liberators and friendly helpers, not occupiers.

It's the one where we assume that citizens of a country would be better off fighting each other than fighting an occupying foreign army (us). Where we figure our new subjects will easily forgive the fact that we occasionally kill scores of innocent civilians and never quite say we're sorry. Where we think everyone will love the puppet government we install for them. It's the one where we attempt to win hearts and minds with soldiers, bullets, and bombs, and when that doesn't work, we try sending more soldiers, more bullets, and more bombs. Where we fail to improve the lives of those we claim to liberate, causing them to yearn for the relative stability of the oppressive past we claim to have rescued them from. Where we don't realize that the people fighting us are not the fringe, but a popular movement committed to repulsing a foreign army that kills civilians.

We saw this movie when it was called Vietnam, and again in the sequel called Iraq, which repeated the mistakes of the original — no plot, a muddled message, poor direction, over budget, and no ending. Yet now we find ourselves in pre-production on another sequel that follows the same losing formula and is sure to be an awful, lethal, costly flop. It's called Afghanistan II — and we need to pull the plug on it before it literally bombs, taking untold numbers of Americans, Afghans, and our economy with it.

 

 

Sadly, Afghanistan is also having a slightly different but equally ugly, ill-conceived sequel forced upon it — one it knows all too well. It's the one where western empires (England, Russia, the US) occupy Afghanistan so they can use it as a battlefield to fight an ideological proxy war. Where promises are broken and Afghan civilians die by the thousands. Where the proud, independent, ridiculously tough people of Afghanistan beat the odds using guerrila tactics perfected over centuries and drive out the forces of the most powerful militaries in human history, leaving Afghanistan a shattered, chaotic, but proudly unoccupied mess.

In fact, this is the only movie most Afghans have ever known, having endured decades of wars and attempted occupations. They know the plot backwards and forwards, and they know exactly how this movie ends. In fact, the invading empires haven't yet figured out that the movie only ends when the Afghani fighters say it does, and they'll stick it out until the very last credit rolls and the lights come up on an unoccupied Afghanistan. Until then, the US can expect to waste more blood, more money, more time, and more influence.

But it doesn't have to be this way. We can say that we are not going to be the co-producers of another crappy sequel we know won't work. We can demand a better story — one about the country that refocused its priorities and pulled itself from one of the darkest times in its history, reinventing itself with optimism, intelligence, and creativity. One about learning from mistakes, listening to your friends, and breaking vicious circles. A movie about facing up to challenges and finding the best in ourselves. Something original and modern that speaks to our generation.

The problem is that we, as a nation, can only afford to make one of these films — the formulaic, predictable, pointless sequel based on a shaky premise or the smart, inspiring movie that you're proud to be a part of.

Which movie would you rather watch?

 

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, vietnam, russia, afghanistan, england, afghan-russian war, anglo-afghan war

Jonathan Kim blogs under the name DJK. He is a Co-Producer at Brave New Films. He co-produces the Fox Attacks series and blogs for the bravenewfilms.org and foxattacks.com websites.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Control.....
Posted by: Captainmagic on Jan 13, 2009 9:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you do not control !!""ANYTHING""!! let alone a "plug"

Regards Captain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AMERICAN INSURGENCY
Posted by: sherman on Jan 14, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is this the beginning...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hegel Said:
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jan 14, 2009 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The one thing history teaches, is that man learns nothing from history..!"

Nothing has changed in 6,000 years...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bombs away
Posted by: motamanx6 on Jan 14, 2009 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we go to Afghanistan, we will be like (and worse than) the Brits and the Russians who went there and got their asses kicked.

We will bomb them (with the best intentions in the world), but some of the bombs--not as smart as we pretend-- will hit wedding parties, as they apparently always do.

Then the Afghans and everyone who knows an injured Afghan will hate us as much as the rest of the Mideast does.

Going there is a no win situation; I assumed that Brack Obama is smart enough to figure that out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Russian ambassador to Afghanistan warns the West cannot win a military victory
Posted by: Garvagh on Jan 14, 2009 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great piece. The aptly-named Russian ambassador in Kabul, Kabulov, told The Times of London recently that no military victory by the West is achievable in Afghanistan, and that energy and resources should be put toward training police and soldiers, and economic development. Obama needs to cancel the plan to send another 30,000 US troops to Afghanistan. Yes, indeed, let us not have a repeat of the Vietnam War disaster by turning the US into the enemy of the people of the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Called The Military Industrial Complex
Posted by: ATH on Jan 14, 2009 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Dwight Eisenhower warned us about the MIC in his farewell speech. I find it amazing that this vastly influential force was not even mentioned in the article or any of the posts, so far.

I also think it's quite naive that the U.S. has "good intentions" when it bombs Iraq or Afganistan. It's certainly not about "democracy!" It's our meddling in the region that has created most of the problems we now face, as recently pointed out by two of the only true patriots we have in Congress, Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul. We created the mujahadeen, and trained Osama bin Laden in weapons developement and use, as part of our attempt to give the Russians their own Vietnam, which it did, but look at the "blowback" (which is an Intelligence word for the un-intended consequences of our covert foreign actions)it has created. Now, many people, like Zibigniew Brezezinski argue that we were helping a people who were being occupied and dominated by a far stronger power, and that causing the demise of Russia, which many claim this war was significant in accomplishing, was more important, and a greater evil than Islamic Terrorists that we face today..which may have more to do with the Israel/Palestine conflict, than with what we did in Afganistan.
That's something that could be debated. I think the thing we did that was wrong is that we didn't help Afganistan to rebuild, after using it as bait to trap the Russians. Whatever we think of bin Laden, and however evil he may be, he was smart enough to figure out what the U.S. had done in Afganistan. If we had instead rightly sent most all of the military forces home, but helped them rebuild with fianacial and technical aid--to construct schools, to help eliminate poverty, etc. and perhaps encourage democracy through diplomacy instead of destruction, we may have been able to have planted a seed showing that we really cared about the people of the M.E.--other than our oil buddies in Saudi Arabia, and, of course, Israel.

Although, with our stance toward the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, we may still have been despised--and with what I've lately seen of Israel--perhaps rightly so....
ALTHOUGH I wish everyone would remember that the people of a country are not its government, and--especially in the U.S. lately--do not always agree with what their government does. The Israeli people support their government's actions, unfortunately, to a great degree. I don't know how much that is do, however, to the type of news control we have, through a corporate monopoly of the media desiminating the government's propaganda for favors like de-regulation...or if it due to a theory I have about Israeli people that they are like a child that was abused (the Holocost)that then grows up to abuse his/her own children(Israel's treatment of the Palestinians). I think that the Holocost affected the Jewish people strongly, so that they kind of became obsessed with power and violence...and with the backing of the U.S. and the selling of our super-weapons to Israel, they have attained this power and ability to inflcit violence.
Violence is in some sense fascinating, especially to men. And power truly is corrupting, so perhaps this is the reason for Israel's immorality, lack of compassion, and descent into fear and hatred...

But behind all this, in America, especially, is a huge industry making a small percent of powerful people very rich, and they have enormous political influence: the MIC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah but there is an up side
Posted by: sicntired on Jan 21, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember Air America?I'm sure all that heroin must've paid for a lot of the bullets and bombs.A lot of guys are still strung out but that's just a hazard of war,right?Lots of heroin in Afghanistan.The CIA will have the economy back on it's feet real soon.Look for a dealer near you.They can call it Afghani red.That's how America likes to pay for it's wars.Then declare a drug war and there's all kinds of money to be made locking the victims up.Viet nam all over again.Join up now.They'll be needing cannon fodder for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]