Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Dealing with the Taliban to End the Afghanistan War

Posted by ZP Heller, Brave New Films at 12:20 PM on December 1, 2008.


An alternative to troop escalation.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

Right now in Afghanistan we're witnessing the worst violence since U.S.-led forces overthrew the Taliban in 2001.  Over 4,000 people have been killed this year alone, nearly a third of which were civilians.  The Taliban grows stronger by the day, gaining local support with each misguided U.S. bombing that adds to the Afghani civilian death toll and each time NATO sets foot in the Kashmir region in pursuit of militants.  Clearly, the current strategy in Afghanistan -- eerily similar to the tactics the Bush administration has employed in Iraq for the last couple of years -- is not working.  Hopefully, President-elect Obama recognizes the vast differences between these two countries, which Noah Feldman highlighted in yesterday's NY Times.  And hopefully, Obama will not simply commit more troops to the region in an Iraq-style surge. 

Yes, Obama just announced Robert Gates will stay on as Defense Secretary.  Gates is well known as a hawkish Iraq war loyalist and a cheerleader of the failed strategy in Afghanistan.  His nomination for this position sparked a great deal of protest among liberals, particularly in the blogosphere.  But as British journalist Patrick Seale noted today, it was actually Gates who told al Jazeera back in October that the U.S. would be willing to negotiate with the Taliban in order to achieve peace. 

Reconciliation with the Taliban might be the best bet for ending the Afghanistan war before it morphs into a quagmire of Iraq proportions.  Afghani President Hamid Karzai favors it, as does the governor of Pakistan's North West Frontier Provence, Owais Ghani.  Even General McKiernan seems to condone negotiating with the Taliban so long as it doesn't involve al-Qaeda. 

Negotiating could be the only way to, as Jason Rosenbaum has written, lower the temperature in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India.  The question now is whether the Taliban would be willing to stop harboring al-Qaeda terrorists and renounce some of their ideological beliefs, like denying basic human rights to women -- a likely precondition for negotiations.  That is, if they're willing to negotiate with the U.S. at all.

Digg!

Tagged as: al qaeda, iraq war, robert gates, united states, taliban, afghanistan war, tariq amin-khan

ZP Heller is the editorial director of Brave New Films. He has written for The American Prospect, AlterNet, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Huffington Post, covering everything from politics to pop culture.


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Negotiations between the US and the Taliban: two players that the people of Afghanistan do not want
Posted by: fanny666 on Dec 1, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A statement from the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA).

Two groups fighting over power in Afghanistan, but the people there want neither.

By the way, that journalist Patrick Seale wrote a really good book on the history of Syria, a biography of its former leader, called Asad. It was written years ago, but it's worth reading as a broad history of the whole Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

876
Posted by: 876 on Dec 1, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have the gall to cite what the governor of some Pakistani region favors for Afghanistan? You might better give the impression you know anything about Afghanistan if you knew enough to know a person is an Afghan not an Afghani. Regardless as Americans have torture camps across the globe and a list of war crimes against people all over the world the notion of ridiculous Americans demanding the Taliban renounce what Americans deem an affront to human rights is absurd. Never mind the many years American sent weapons and aid to the Taliban to kill and terrorize Afghan civilians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

876
Posted by: 876 on Dec 1, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NY Times article you cite as a great run down of the situation in Afghanistan is full of inaccuracy and downright misinformation. The author has no understanding of Afghan society or the relationships between various ethnic groups in Afghanistan. To speak as if the Taliban represent any ethnic group simply because a large number of them are of a particular ethnic group is to insist that the Bush administration speaks for white America because he and his administration are largely white.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why USA is in Afghanistan
Posted by: richholland on Dec 1, 2008 6:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA imperium needs oil so it starts wars.

The USA workers are addicted so USA is in Afghanistan to obtain Heroine and Ganja.

If in near future medical marihuana is for sale in many states what will be the result for Afghanistan??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple, quit funding them and ABOLISH the CIA.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 2, 2008 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until then, get your tissues out and be prepared for more grief in Afghanistan !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has Afghanistan ever been conquered?
Posted by: willymack on Dec 2, 2008 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No. Not by Alexander the Great, not by the Brits, not by the Soviets, and certainly not by us. Time to quit while we're behind and get the hell out. Nobody's fooling us about bin Laden or the phony "war on terror" any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just history
Posted by: sicntired on Dec 4, 2008 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who studied history knows that Afghanistan is a disaster for any invading army.The longer you're there,the worse it gets.Too bad politicians spend too much time chasing skirt and not enough at the books.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]