Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. Senator Keeps Using Racially Loaded Language

Posted by Ben Armbruster, Think Progress at 5:26 AM on November 12, 2008.


Citing "high percentage of minority vote" in Georgia, Chambliss laments not getting "our folks" out to vote.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

In last week's election, Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss (R) received more votes than his Democratic challenger Jim Martin but fell 0.2 percent short of the 50-percent-plus needed under Georgia law to win the election. Both candidates are expected to be headed for a runoff election next month.

Last night on Fox News, when asked why he wasn't able to "close the deal" with Georgia voters on election day, Chambliss said that because of Barack Obama, there was a "high percentage of minority vote" and that his campaign wasn't "able to get enough of our folks out" to vote:

COLMES: Why do you think you've been unable...[to] close the deal with the people of Georgia in terms of what happened on Election Day?

CHAMBLISS: Well, listen, we have, for the first time in the history the our state, a 30-day advanced vote period, and let's give the Obama people credit. They did a good job of getting out their vote early.

There was a high percentage of minority vote, and I am tickled to death that as many Georgians as did examined their right to vote. That's what make our election process the envy of the whole free world, but we weren't able to get enough of our folks out on Election Day.

Apparently, when Chambliss refers to "our folks," he's talking about Georgia's white voters. He added that it's going to be a "challenge to get them out in the runoff" but that his campaign "look[s] forward to that challenge."

In fact, Chambliss has used racially loaded, us-versus-them rhetoric in this campaign before. Just prior to Nov. 4, Chambliss bluntly warned his white base that "the other folks are voting," adding that the "rush to the polls by African-Americans early" has "got our side energized early, they see what is happening."

However, it seems that Chambliss's base wasn't as energized as he thought.

Update: Also during the same segment, Chambliss defended an ad he ran against 2002 opponent Sen. Max Cleland (D) in which he linked Cleland -- a war veteran who lost limbs in Vietnam -- to Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. "That ad was very fair," Chambliss said. "That is a lightweight ad."

Editor's Update: Some people are calling the December 2nd runoff between Chambliss and Jim Martin an Obama and McCain rematch, as both men will be involved in the Georgia race.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, mccain, georgia, chambliss, colmes, jim martin

Benjamin J. Armbruster is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Juan Cole on Iranian Protests and the Reform Movement's Future
Cole and HuffPo's Nico Pitney discuss how the Obama administration must engage the Iranian regime.
Post by ZP Heller. July 9, 2009.
David Letterman: Top Ten Messages On Sarah Palin's Answering Machine
The Letterman / Palin saga continues.
Post by Mark Ristaino. July 9, 2009.
Xinjiang Riots Explode in China
Ethnic protests rocked China's western Xinjiang province, killing at least 140 and injuring more than 800.
Post by Mark Ristaino. July 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
To Georgia Voters
Posted by: FSadley on Nov 12, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not over yet. Please vote on December 2 for Jim Martin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me get this straight.
Posted by: Longdream on Nov 12, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This pissant Chambliss is complaining that they weren''t able to get enough of their own folks out to vote. So, who is it that their own folks didn't get out to vote for, but his his own putzerating self, and that poster-man for the active arthritic, John McCain. And who is going to be campaigning for him, but said John McCain, the drinking man's candidate.

I was filled with disgust when I thought Chambliss won on election night. The fact that he's going down spitting racial slurs does my heart good.

McCain should say, "Fuck NO!", and go about the business of retiring from the Senate with a rag of pride to dress in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let me get this straight. Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» RE: Let me get this straight. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Let me get this straight. Posted by: MyLeftFoot
You're surprised that republicans consider their voters and different from democrats?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 12, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to reality. So glad you stopped in.

If you're interested, there are also republican versus democrat partisan posts on youtube, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC...

...dot.com.

Welcome to winner versus loser politics, where not feeling like a loser generally trumps progress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cleland Slandered
Posted by: JSquercia on Nov 12, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry Max but that Ad you think of as Lightweight was the most despicable Ad I have ever seen .
The slandering as Unpatriotic of a man who lost 3 limbs in Vietnam by a man who did not serve is beyond the pale . In fact the whole idea that Cleland voted AGAINST Homeland Security was an ABSOLUTE LIE . First of all Homeland Security Department was A Democratic idea and Bush was at FIRST against IT . The President and the Republican's grudgingly accepted the idea BUT ONLY if they coule strip the Employees of Civil Service Protections and UNION representation . That is WHY Claland opposed the bill and tried to have those features REMOVED . Never let FACTS get in your way
I only hope and pray that OUR voters will remain energized and Remember that we NEED a Senate that can invoke Cloture to prevent the kind of obstrucionism that hampered the last congress when the Minority party prevented the will of the Majority 92 times .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

look up "vermin" in the dictionary
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 12, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and you'll find a pic of Sen. Chambliss there.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm a White Georgia Voter
Posted by: 1wildcat on Nov 12, 2008 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I have NEVER voted for Saxby and I NEVER will. I have bombarded this person with e-mails stateing my concerns many times and I always get back an e-mail that basically says he doesn't care what my views are, he will vote the way he wants. He has lied so many times, begining with those dispicable ads against Max Cleland, and he votes againts providing the best body armour possible for American troops. I just wish more Georgians would pay attention!
I'll be out for the runoff, and I'll take my whole family with me. We have got to unseat this %&()&*^.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can we PLEASE get over ourselves?
Posted by: dowfusky on Nov 12, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I offer no opinion of this man's personality or politics. I am, however, disturbed by the assumption that racism underlies ANY first person plural reference to race made by ANY person "not of color." I'm white and, God help me, I do sometimes use the word "us" when referring to people of my own race. How does that differ from using the same word in contexts that have nothing to do with race? I can say "we Catholics" or "we Californians," but saying "we white people" smacks somehow of racism, while "we Latin Americans," for example, doesn't. Is there a statute of limitations on this kind of hypocrisy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How the Irish Became White Posted by: Cityzen Jane
"What new, South..?"
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 12, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Randy Newman wrote the great tune Rednecks for guys like this, give it a listen...

As I always say, "What new South..?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really?
Posted by: Scientz on Nov 12, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THAT is "racially loaded" language?

Wow. I don't buy it. "Our folks" could have just as easily meant "Republicans" which, of course, I believe it did.

I want a 60-seat filibuster-proof supermajority as much as anyone else, but falsely playing the race card isn't how to go about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: really? Posted by: 1wildcat
» RE: Really? Posted by: chuckjs
» Huh? Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Huh? Posted by: Longdream
» I agree with Scientz Posted by: milhouse2002
» RE: I agree with Scientz Posted by: Longdream
» Tat doant maatuh! Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Tat doant maatuh! Posted by: Longdream
Racist
Posted by: outlander55 on Nov 13, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chambliss is just another racist. Too bad he follows the ignorant fold of those who think they are better than others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree with Scientz's comment below
Posted by: milhouse2002 on Nov 13, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see the author's point of view, but there is an alternative point of view that Scientz points out. Chambliss mentioned the Obama team doing a good effort getting the vote out. Then he mentioned "our folk". It's possible that "our folk" can be also refering to Republicans.

Life isn't black and white. There are many view points. I'm going to give Chambliss the benefit of the doubt, regardless of what he may have said or done in the past, as some people have commented on.

Keep in mind that this is coming from a Hispanic liberal/progressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]