Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Africa Not a Continent? Can't Name Members of NAFTA? Palin's Lack of Knowledgeability Comes to Light

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 7:36 AM on November 6, 2008.


The Palin blame game begins among McCain staffers.

Last night, Fox News’s Carl Cameron reported that “there was great concern in the McCain campaign that Sarah Palin lacked a degree of knowledgability [sic] necessary to be a running mate, vice president, and a heartbeat away from the Presidency.” For example, aides said Palin did not know that Africa was a continent, rather than a country. According to ABC News, Palin dismissed the internal criticism and refused to comment on the specific allegations:

PALIN: That’s kind of a small, evidently bitter type of person who would anonymously charge something foolish like that, that I perhaps didn’t know an answer to a question. So until I know who is talking about it, I won’t have a comment on false allegations.

The explosive claims — including that Palin could not name the signatories to NAFTA and that she refused to prepare before her Katie Couric interviews — are the latest signs of infighting and finger-pointing among McCain campaign staffers, not to mention evidence that Palin was difficult to control. For example, Newsweek and the New York Times are reporting that Palin spent far more than the originally-reported $150,000 on clothing, including spending on shoes, jewelry, and even luggage.

While Palin’s astounding misunderstanding of the basic nature of Africa has not yet been confirmed, it certainly would not deviate from her demonstrated lack of fundamental knowledge about the world:

– Palin suggested the U.S. shares a border with Afghanistan, calling it “our neighboring country.”

– Palin touted her foreign policy experience by explaining, “You can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.”

– Palin suggested the U.S. was in a war with Iran.

– Palin claimed that “Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America,” though there have been no Russian incursions of American airspace during Palin’s tenure.

The fact that Palin thought, for example, that South Africa was just a region of the larger country of Africa makes McCain’s claim to have “turned to her for advice” on foreign policy “many times” that much more implausible — or frightening.

Digg!

Tagged as: john mccain, sarah palin

Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.


Cheney Looks Awkward as Pelosi Interrupts Him to Applaud Obama's Victory
Vice President Cheney stood before Congress and read the official results of the 2008 presidential election. It's now officially official.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Will Obama Be Swept Up in the Momentum of Afghanistan Escalation?
Breaking down two important opinion pieces on the war.
Post by Alex Thurston. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Firstly...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Nov 6, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope to Godzilla she didn't prepare for the first Couric interview. If she did, then she is far more of an idiot than anyone imagined.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Firstly... Posted by: tap17x
To move on you must let go...
Posted by: Knowmad on Nov 6, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stunning, wonderful results from Tuesday night highlighted the mature, intelligent and progressive potential you Americans have retained, despite the past eight years of abuse, belligerence and astonishing ignorance.

So, I hope you'll be pleased to realise that continued attempts at 'National Enquirer' sensationalism and titillation at the expense of someone like sad, naive Palin - who was hopelessly out of her depth - or anyone else from the 'old days' is now beneath you. Those who continue to stoop to petty - such a mainstay of the right's campaign strategy - only advertise their own lack of maturity. You'll notice your new President doesn't go there.

However, this in no way excuses those members of the old guard who conducted criminal, sometimes inhumane acts, and deserve to be held accountable by the justice system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah right... Posted by: ~Fiona~
» RE: To move on you must let go... Posted by: goeswithness
Knowmad, I could not disagree with you more...
Posted by: ~Fiona~ on Nov 6, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is not just going to go away...

She's had a taste of power and she will do anything to have more of it. From the moment she first stepped out of relative obscurity onto the world stage she has not hesitated to incite poisonous hatered in anyone who is of the fowl ilk to actually bear listening to her. Just in the short space of 2 months she had media attention, Palin became totally out of control, insisting on stirring up greater and greater hatred at every opportunity. Mark my words, this woman is not going to happily disappear into history unless someone shoves her back under the muck from which she rose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hello Dear Knowmad ... Posted by: ~Fiona~
» a fine line here Posted by: Drclaw
"Until I know who's talking about it, I won't have a comment on...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 6, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....

...(wait for it)...

...

...false allegations."

Ain't that the definition of a comment, guv'ner, my dear? And my, the defensiveness..."allegations"? Have we gotten a tad wrapped up in legalese at home?

You know, I like the idea of "a" "Sarah Palin"...somebody not born with a silver spoon in their mouths (GWB), with the ability to speak naturally, directly to people (not Kerry). Simply put, however, her understanding of the world around her is insufficient, on par, more or less, with that of Jimmy Carter.

She's as bad of a candidate, intellectually, as...say...Noam Chomsky might be, from a practical standpoint. The fact that we limit ourselves to the lesser dunces between two parties, however, speaks volumes about what we're willing to tolerate from a candidate in national elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fair enough. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Fair enough. Posted by: Quannah
Palin was a truly frightening near miss, with the abyss..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 6, 2008 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's truly frightening thanks to John McCain's reckless irresponsibility and disregard for our nations well being and best interest, how close we came to the abyss with this Palin nomination..

Never has anyone so undeserving and ill prepared and unqualified, uneducated or informed ever reached so close to the highest executive power over our nation...

McCain shamed himself with this act and every elected official who supported her is equally at fault in this regard...

Palin was America's Eva Peron..

McCain himself was truly unfit to be President by virtue of this act..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Quite the Perfect Neocon Candidate
Posted by: dudelette on Nov 6, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin was uneducated, an anti-intellectual, and proud of it. She would have been the perfect GOP candidate if only she had kept her mouth shut and did exactly what she was told by her handlers. One thing about Shrub, he knew to do what he was told.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The more I hear
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Nov 6, 2008 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about this woman the more I cringe.

She is appallingly ignorant. That alone should be enough to completely disqualify her but apparently some people like stupid. Add this outrageous stupidity to the fact that she is also a crazy religious nut job, liar, ethically challenged, overly emotional DIVA and you have a complete joke of a candidate, who might have actually won. That would not be even remotely funny.

I hope she just slinks back to Alaska and disappears but I doubt it.

Anyone who still supports/likes this woman is thinking with the wrong head.

Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SARAH OVERPLAYED HER HAND
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 6, 2008 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She was in way over her head. Thought the show was 'all about her'. She was a pain in everyone's ass and I refuse to believe that she was John McCain's choice. She should go off to the world of irrelevance. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Campaign officials got what they asked for
Posted by: badgersprite on Nov 6, 2008 8:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion, they picked Gov. Palin because of her obvious lack of knowledge, not in spite of it. They were hoping for a second George Bush Jr.; a puppet they could control, an empty vessel through which to channel their ideas and purposes. They never thought they were getting someone smart and well-informed; they wanted an idiot. But they didn't realise that Gov. Palin is not an empty vessel. She's full of it, if you will, but not empty.

Misguided though they may be, she is rock solid in her ways, convictions, and in her self-belief, or self-delusion. If nothing else, that meant one good thing; the campaign staff couldn't overpower her and use her the way they wanted to. The reason they're going mental and attacking her so viciously now (regardless of whether or not the accusations are true) is because they were expecting a dainty, weak-willed, "seen and not heard" woman they could shape to their liking but instead found they had someone stubborn, strong-headed and individualistic.

Nothing irks them more than a candidate with opinions and a refusal to conform. Gov. Palin didn't 'go rogue', except in the sense that they just couldn't control her the same way I personally believe they managed to control Sen. McCain throughout the election season. They got what they deserved when they asked for the least qualified person they could find, so that they could train her to be the next smiling mouthpiece. I'm glad they got somebody who wouldn't cooperate.

This is the lesson they needed to learn; hijacking the party with dumb, malleable figureheads dangled on a string is a strategy that isn't going to cut it anymore, and it won't save them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Country First?
Posted by: sherman on Nov 7, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we needn't probe too deep. Palin and Mccain fit together all too well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I found the most amazing thing about all of this...
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 7, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that she hasn't once said that none of it is TRUE!

How hard would that have been?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]