Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rachel Maddow Slams the New 'Poll Tax'

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 2:24 PM on November 3, 2008.


Voting problems in this country have reached the point at which they cannot be ignored.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

A friend of mine in Miami, M.G., waited in line for five hours the other day to vote. Her elderly mother wasn't physically able to wait that long, but fortunately, M.G. was permitted to hold her place in line. Some senior citizens don't have anyone willing or able to help in that capacity, and they're forced to choose -- endure extraordinarily long lines, which is a challenge even for young voters, or just go home, and not participate in the most important election in generations.



I've seen plenty of reports over the last week or so about how inspiring all of this is. And these reports are not without merit -- for a country that is allegedly cynical and apathetic, there are untold thousands willing to endure painfully (literally) long lines just to cast a ballot.



But Rachel Maddow seems to be the only media figure calling this out for what it is: a poll tax.



That there are Americans who are told they have to wait in lines up to 10 hours is a genuine national disgrace, but what about those who want to cast a ballot, but simply don't have the luxury of taking three or five or seven or 10 hours to stand in line? For some, their employers won't tolerate that kind of break. For others, who get paid by the hour, it's simply too expensive to give up that much time. For others still, it's just not a physical option.


It is, as Ezra noted, "disenfranchisement in action. A longer line does not simply mean more people are voting. It means more people are not voting, as they could not afford the time tax."



Voting problems in this country have reached the point at which they cannot be ignored. Voter-suppression tactics, electronic voting machines, and disjointed paper ballots are already areas of serious concern, but these ridiculously long lines should embarrass officials into action. It's simply untenable that our democracy tries to function this way.

Digg!

Tagged as: democracy, msnbc, rachel maddow, poll tax, ezra


GOP Senator Lindsey Graham Breaks Ranks, Admits "The Green Economy Is Coming"
Finally, one member of the GOP has a slice of reality pie.
Post by Staff. November 5, 2009.
Iowa Wingnut Steve King Lauds Lobbyists as American Heros for Bussing in Health Reform Protesters
Astroturfing earns praise from the GOP rep.
Post by Lee Fang. November 4, 2009.
GOP Loon Goes Off the Rails: Health Reform Greater Threat than Terrorism
The government's trying to put you to death, don't you know.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
re: poll tax
Posted by: lienjud@aol.com on Nov 3, 2008 8:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Switzerland votes on Sundays! So, how about making election day a holiday? Or, why not change to voting by mail like we do in Oregon? You have time to think, talk and everyone, able bodied or not, can participate without taking time off from work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you foolproof the system, how we gonna rig the vote?
Posted by: Pancho Angry on Nov 3, 2008 10:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you realize the commerce your suppressing by taking the play out of the system? What's the point of being rich if you can't bribe the occasional election official? Think of the Republican county clerks out there with families to feed and tax accountants to pay. Next you'll be wanting to take the profit out of disease!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mail in ballots? Early voting? No disenfranchisement.
Posted by: rickiey on Nov 4, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know in florida, I had the option of mailing my ballot. I chose to vote in person via early voting. My wait was 45 minutes.

Time is money, so Rachel would be correct in calling it a poll tax, if there were not methods of voting that avoided paying it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not everyone has to pay
Posted by: coop on Nov 4, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just returned from my mostly white, upper income precinct in St. Petersburg, Florida and waited 20 minutes, 10 of which were before the doors opened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

handicapped lines?
Posted by: bad penny on Nov 4, 2008 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really think we need national standards for voting eligibility and for voting machines
(paper trails etc). Given the dirty tricks that abound probably a national registration system, coupled with social security numbers.
But in the meantime, how about a special waiting line for folks over 65 and for the handicapped?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want to be the first to apply for a government job...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 4, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...whereby I run around my neighborhood collecting votes of folks on the November 4th Party erection day farce.

That way, pro-choice minded folks (of which I am one) who choose the least convenient day (I didn't) and choose least convenient time of that day to vote, won't fret over lost convenience. They can choose to sit on their couch until I show up! I'll just ring the doorbell and say, "Here little darlin', here's your ballot, and your pencil. No, no, don't get up, I brought you a writing tray. Awwww, do you need me to fill it in for you so you don't have to switch your beer mug to your weft widdle hand? Why, shore, I'll do that!"

All I ask for in return is a "living wage", free-as-in-beer* healthcare, and a chance to withdraw what will be by then (at this rate) a few worthless U.S. dollars from the National Ponzii Retirement Scheme before it goes bankrupt.

*at someone else's party

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree
Posted by: aonghus36 on Nov 4, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rachel Maddow is right, as usual. My mom couldn't vote this year. It was the first time I've ever seen her not vote. Her health wouldn't allow her to wait in the long line. I almost had to get out of line because a restroom trip was needed, although I made myself go before leaving the house. Maybe election day should be election days. Perhaps it could be done over a two to three day period. It might mean having to wait longer before knowing who will be the next elected official, but at least we'll be able to sit down as we do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These are major Civil Rights Violations going unaddressed by our corrupted DOJ..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Nov 4, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each and every and any impediment to your exercising your most inalienable right that being to vote in our participatory democracy such as it is, including waiting over 1 hour to do so...

Constitutes a violation of the 1st, 5th and 14th Amendment as well as the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act..

Waiting hours in line to vote is for me "cruel and unusual" punishment...

Sadly Bush and Gonzales, Mukasey and even Karl Rove as he called the shots all to often at DOJ while slithering around the White House have all but eviscerated and gutted our Civil Rights and Voters Rights Divisions at DOJ, and the Federalist Society which has infested the DOJ played a large part in all this..as well..QED..!

Simple as that..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other western democracies do it better.
Posted by: wolfgangmo on Nov 4, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
85% of western democracies hold election votes on the weekend.

Canada doesn't use voting machines, have hanging chads or anything like that. They are the second largest country in the world with one of the lowest populations and yet they have accurate poll counting within about 1 hour of the polls closing.

They use simple ballots and a number 2 pencil. Voters just put a big X in a big box by their candidates name. It is simple and almost impossible to confuse. And the country is so big that they have to send ballot boxes by dog sled, canoe, and baby seal to get them counted.

The only reason we are not doing something this simple, cost effective and accurate is that it is in someone's interest to pick the politicians they want in office.

It is an international disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demand hand-counted paper ballots for next time!
Posted by: Pollyanna2 on Nov 4, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Computer experts the world over have said there IS NO WAY to guarantee our votes are counted correctly using electronic voting machines.
NO way.
All the testing in the world cannot detect a rig. Experts have done demonstrations of it.
The idea that if we had a "paper trail" on every machine, we could re-count the vote is a phony trick.
They can easily rig the machine to count your vote one way & print the opposite on the paper.
NO!
The old-fashioned way is best: Hand-counted paper ballots--with observers from both parties & others watching.
We MUST get rid of HAVA (the 'Help America Vote Act'). It is just a way certain rich men pushed a law through to make a ton of money off the taxpayers for themselves while forcing us to pay for their lousy, inaccurate, machines.
Some of the same companies that make our ATMs at our banks, also make these crappy electronic vote machines(& overcharge us)--but for some strange reason (ahem)--our vote machines CONSTANTLY break down, need to be "re-calibrated", & mess up--while they've figured out how to make our ATMs work right every time--even though the ATMs are FAR MORE complicated!
You won't see the mainstream media report any of this--why would they rat themselves out?
Ask yourself WHY IN THE WORLD our votes are counted on machines made by PRIVATE CORPORATIONS??!! AND these corporations demand & get secrecy on their source codes! They claim it's private property--"proprietary".
What a farce.
The joke's on us, my fellow citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Poll tax....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 4, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C'mon where is the fun of doing the right thing, how do you believe that making it equal for everyone is fair! Republicans have got to rig the system some kind of way - whaddaya think this is a "Democracy"! Puhlease!!!!!

What really needs to happen is either: (1)make election day a true federal holiday, that way everyone gets to participate in the process, or (2)you change it to a Saturday - as "most" people will be able to participate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can you make something so simple so complicated?
Posted by: MarcusA on Nov 4, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fail to understand how the worlds most technologically advanced country manages to screw up what could be a relatively simple procedure.

Here in Sweden we vote on Sundays. We do not have to register beforehand. It takes about 5 minutes in all, is done on a paper ballot and counting the ballots usually takes 4-5 hours.

This is how it's done in most western countries from what I understand. How come the USA messes it up almost every time?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]