Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Religulous: Atheists Will Love Bill Maher's New Flick

Posted by DJK, Brave New Films at 12:39 PM on October 11, 2008.


Bill Maher questions religion's inherent contradictions in a new documentary.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

(Religulous – documentary – 101 min – directed by Larry Charles – starring Bill Maher)

Finally, a movie for my people! That's right, I'm an atheist. In fact, I'm so much of an atheist that I don't even like the term. I think the default setting for humans is to not be religious — I might as well call myself a non-snake handler, non-scientologist, or a non-branch Davidian.

But enough about me. Religulous, directed by Borat director Larry Charles, follows Bill Maher as he travels the world questioning religious "experts" and believers about the inherent contradictions and accepted silliness that makes up the bulk of the world's "organized" religions. Maher is not an atheist — he just accepts that he does not know the answers to life's big spiritual questions, and that anyone who claims to know with absolute certainty what God or Allah wants or what happens when we die must be doubted to the utmost. Pretty hard to argue with that.

Maher has been talking about religion for his entire comedic career. At times, the movie feels a bit like watching his stand up being performed to an audience of one, whether it be a Jew for Jesus, a Muslim cleric, or an evangelical senator. Which is not a bad thing — there are big laughs in Religulous as Maher boldly challenges the many illogical, violent, farcical beliefs that form the foundation of most religions. Unlike Borat, Religulous uses a lot of stock footage and clips to punctuate its jokes, while also adding a welcome dose of infotainment. For example, who knew that the story of Jesus — with its virgin birth, 12 disciples and resurrection — is a variation of a tale that had been circulating the Middle East and the Mediterranean for decades?

While Maher does more than his fair share of attacking and mocking, the believers in the film are the most effective in making a mockery of themselves. When you hear people speaking in tongues, declaring that humans coexisted peacefully with dinosaurs, or explaining how prayer can cure homosexuality, it's hard not to conclude that religion is simply an accepted form of mass insanity. And in several refreshing turns, religious officials admit that they are teaching illogical fantasy, that their institutions are rife with hypocrisy, and make fun of their religion's more fundamentalist sects.

Some may find Maher's manner to be condescending or overly aggressive, and sometimes it is. Maher has obviously spent a lot of time studying religion to find its weak points and inconsistencies, and he clearly enjoys confronting people about them. But while Maher can be quite pointed, he often just asks people questions so viewers can hear what these true believers have to say. And it's not that he's springing "gotcha" questions — is it wrong to ask a devout Christian if they really believe in talking snakes or how Jesus could be three people at once?

Religulous focuses mainly on Christianity, Islam, and occasionally on Judaism. Eastern religions like Buddhism and Taoism are excluded, which makes sense to me since I see those as being philosophies more than they are religions. And, unfortunately, the movie ends on a preachy, conspicuously unfunny note as Maher unloads his feelings on why religion is a danger to civilization and, combined with increasingly powerful weaponry, could potentially destroy the earth. I actually agree with much of this sentiment, but the tone and placement of this polemic ends a good movie on a sour note.

Still, Religulous is an entertaining, thought-provoking movie that even religious people will enjoy, especially if they’re able to get a laugh at their own expense. If they aren’t, well, that sort of proves the whole point Religulous and Bill Maher are trying to make.

Digg!

Tagged as: religion, bill maher, religulous, brave new review, larry charles

Jonathan Kim blogs under the name DJK. He is a Co-Producer at Brave New Films. He co-produces the Fox Attacks series and blogs for the bravenewfilms.org and foxattacks.com websites.


'The End of America,' Liberty: Use It or Lose It
A look at the compelling new documentary based on Naomi Wolf's book of the same name.
Post by Staff. December 3, 2008.
'Prop 8: The Musical' Starring Jack Black, John C. Reilly, and More
From the hilarious folks at Funny or Die.
Post by Staff. December 3, 2008.
The Election of Obama and the White Supremacist Threat
It's the taboo subject you're not supposed to talk about -- Barack Obama's safety in light of the rise of white supremacists in America.
Post by Davin Hutchins. December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
bornagainatheist
Posted by: ajsz on Oct 11, 2008 9:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I enjoyed the movie, and thought it was quite funny, I wish Maher had spent a little less time with the, shall we say, most fervent believers, (even as funny and scary as they were), and a little more time with the more rational subjects. It makes for a movie too easily dismissed as just a hatchet job. It is, I expect, preaching to the choir. Perhaps fence-sitters might be convinced to get off the fence, but any of the 'devout' set won't even see it, and will just spout off whatever they are told by Fox or Limbaugh or their pastor, etc. It's trying to be a comedy and a documentary, and is not completely successful at either. And yes, the end is heavy-handed (though not incorrect), but is inconsistant with the rest of the movie. I wish he'd let Francis Collins (Human Genome Project) speak some more, that he let Andrew Newberg (Why We Believe What We Believe) speak at all. That being said, I still recommend everyone go see it, and bring your favorite fundamentalist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bornagainatheist Posted by: patsy6
» RE: bornagainatheist Posted by: popsicle67
Tough call
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Oct 12, 2008 4:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think it's cool to badger people about their beliefs or go around looking to poke holes in their belief systems, just so you can feel superior, or make movies. I think the recent wave of that started as an appropriate reaction to GWB & Co's crusade mentality, and then snowballed into a whole religion-bashing thing.

At the same time, I suppose I'm glad there's somebody out there pushing back against the constant encroachment of religion on our personal lives and state affairs. I think it's ridiculous that all candidates are obligated to describe their "prayer life" in detail, and that I have to say "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", or else be burned at the stake for killing Christmas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tough call Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» RE: Tough call Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: Tough call Posted by: harryf200
» Not a tough call Posted by: bornxeyed
» Uh, no, part II Posted by: Fog
» RE: Uh, no, part II Posted by: harryf200
» ...a look at the logic ... Posted by: harryf200
» RE: ...a look at the logic ... Posted by: jroth420
» RE: ...a look at the logic ... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Uh, no, part II Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Uh, no, part II Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Uh, no, part II Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Uh, no, part II Posted by: liz_imp
» Furthermore Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Furthermore?? Posted by: harryf200
» What are you talking about? Posted by: wireup
» RE: What are you talking about? Posted by: harryf200
» True enough but .... Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Tough call Posted by: Marlena
» RE: Tough call Posted by: mainspark
» RE: Tough call Posted by: blitzmesser
Polite Debate
Posted by: aogfc on Oct 12, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Maher was dead on with this film. Rational debate is wasted on most believers in any kind of effort to convince them of the ridiculousness of the ancient desert dogmas. Atheists have stood by for too long and let ourselves but diminished and insulted by the religious community to the point of where the first President Bush said that he did not consider an Atheist to be a citizen of the US. This film HAD to be made, he said what HAD to be said.. about time someone took on Religion in the public square without letting them getting bogged down with trying to be even handed... I have never seen a religious film that was even handed toward Atheism.
Cheers to Bill... well done... swing harder next time....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Polite Debate Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» Polite Debate my ass Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Polite Debate my ass Posted by: aogfc
» RE: Polite Debate my ass Posted by: luckypuck
Pretty hard to argue with sexual assault.
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 12, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maher is not an atheist — he just accepts that he does not know the answers to life's big spiritual questions, and that anyone who claims to know with absolute certainty what God or Allah wants or what happens when we die must be doubted to the utmost. Pretty hard to argue with that.

I hope he feels guilty.

We, Bill and I, argued all that here in the pages of AlterNet. Then he took it on the road to make some money. Isn't he on board as thinking rape was funny? Yes he is.

It is a small world dude, my family got your message LOUD AND CLEAR, rape the bitch. Your scorn was recieved in my home, literally. All around. I mean really, who are my kids and hubby going to listen to? Bill Maher or me?

I don't know what his handle here is, but I do remember arguing religion with him. This part clued me in for sure:

the movie ends on a preachy, conspicuously unfunny note as Maher unloads his feelings on why religion is a danger to civilization and, combined with increasingly powerful weaponry, could potentially destroy the earth.

Yup I recognized it. The tone and 'voice'. I got something for you Bill, She is a Catholic and heads up the NSA spying on little old me. I like the one with space in the middle to write the word TRAITOR or TERRORIST on it.

I felt like I was ripped off leaving the movie. Why'd I pay for that, he should have been paying me. It was my idea.

Bill and I have argued religion before but he has a comedy club, I am just a housewife. He is one of the people who didn't think I had a plan. Cynicism that left me with stitches and a very nasty attitude towards men who think rape is funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh good it's not just me Posted by: EinMD
» Lauren Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Pretty hard to argue with sexual assault. Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com
Be honest (you too Mr. Maher)...
Posted by: Knowmad on Oct 12, 2008 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think if one wants to feel they believe in Atheism it's perfectly okay, if that's what seems right for them.

However, objectively, (I have no religious bias), and at the risk of becoming a target, I personally believe that there isn't anyone on the planet courageous enough to fully ascribe to and believe that their ultimate fate is truly final, and they are nevermore.

Think about it for 30 seconds before you respond. Really think about it: You - whatever that may be - gone...forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» atheism is not a belief, Posted by: harryf200
» RE: atheism is not a belief, Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: atheism is not a belief, Posted by: harryf200
» You are DEAD WRONG!!! Posted by: wireup
» RE: You are DEAD WRONG!!! Posted by: harryf200
» What is a God? Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Hilarity... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Hilarity... Posted by: mike1997
» RE: Hilarity... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Hilarity... Posted by: bornxeyed
» And for the record Posted by: bornxeyed
» Everyone is Biased Posted by: mejsmith
» I know exactly who 'I' am ... Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Be honest (you too Mr. Maher)... Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
» It's a perpetual game... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: It's a perpetual game... Posted by: bornxeyed
» You start with a false premise Posted by: bornxeyed
» Make that Posted by: walldodger1969
» Honesty Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Honesty Posted by: Knowmad
» Absolutely Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Honesty Posted by: realtruther
» RE: Be honest (you too Mr. Maher)... Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com
» Honesty, schmonesty Posted by: jmooney
To "believe" anything...
Posted by: loxias on Oct 12, 2008 6:33 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is to refute the intellectual evolution of our species.
Healthy specimens learn, study, grasp, comprehend, perceive, and imagine.
Those that believe got a poor mix of genes.
Can't blame them, though.
Likely a lack of vitamin C in the womb.
Nevertheless, it serves to keep your eyes open.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: Lilykins
» Lily, you are my new God Posted by: wolfgangmo75
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: harryf200
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: harryf200
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: Lilykins
» RE: To "believe" anything... Posted by: jroth420
Is it because comedy pays better that religion needs to be put down?
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 13, 2008 12:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If effort counts for anything, I have spent considerable effort investigating religion to try to discover what is not susceptible to ridicule.

The problem with skepticism is that an honest skeptic would direct the same critique at himself. Must not a genuine skeptic be skeptical of skepticism?

That approaches what I have found cannot be ridiculed in honest religion. Authentic religion provides a discipline for the believer. So, sure, when the finger is pointed accusingly at others, we are likely to find a phony.

I do not share the belief of the Hindu ascetics who own nothing and beg for whatever they need to sustain themselves. However, I would be ashamed to ridicule them.

I don’t pay attention to Maher, so you will have to tell me if he ever gives evidence of any sense of shame. No, that’s not what is essential in religion. It’s just a part of what being human is all about, as when a laugh covers up an abuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Funny Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Funny Posted by: bornxeyed
» Comedy pays better? Posted by: EinMD
» RE: Comedy pays better? Posted by: harryf200
» Spot on! Posted by: harryf200
» HUh? Posted by: bornxeyed
» Amen! Posted by: bornxeyed
Is It Really Badgering?
Posted by: DR. LARRY MITCHELL on Oct 13, 2008 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These religious types, and the churches and ministries they support, have been pushing their agenda in our face for years.

There is nothing wrong with asking questions, particularly of an accepted nonsense.

"Why do you believe what you believe?" If you walk it, talk it- reaffirm your belief structure.

If something doesn't make sense to you, well then- maybe it's time to go shopping for a new belief. In either instance, the individual on the barrel-end of the question has an opportunity to grow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The point he was trying to make
Posted by: krim on Oct 13, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that there isn't any way that we can know for sure. Any religion, including atheism, implies that there is a right answer, and we simply won't know for sure until we die. The problem with religion is not that is gives people comfort or a sense of community, the problem is the right/wrong thing. I'm right, and you're going to hell. I'm right, and now I'm going to kill you.
Religions (all of them) have some beautiful messages of peace and love that we could all stand to apply to our everyday lives. I choose to believe in those messages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The point he was trying to make Posted by: helenahanbasquet
» Numbnuts Posted by: EinMD
» Here's how I see it.... Posted by: woodford54
Who knew (the Jesus story) was not original?
Posted by: rugger on Oct 13, 2008 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"For example, who knew that the story of Jesus — with its virgin birth, 12 disciples and resurrection — is a variation of a tale that had been circulating the Middle East and the Mediterranean for decades? "

Excuse me, I knew. Once you pull your head out from the brainwashing that we are inculcated since birth, it is obvious that the story of Jesus was a myth taken from various other world religions, something that the ancient Jews wanted to adopt for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [